[Username]

I’m surprised with all this gun talk no one brought up the H&K Benelli M1 Super 90. I’m haven’t gone gun shopping for a while and I’m not sure if they are still legal to purchase in California. That is one of the finest weapons I own. I got the extender tube so it holds 7 in the tube, 1 in the loading gate and 1 in the chamber making a total of 9 12 gauge rounds fired as fast as you can pull the trigger. It’s gas operated so there is very little lift and with the ghost rings that came on it you don’t lose any vision. If you really want to over do it there’s the M3 version which is both semi auto and pump, but the M1 semi auto is a great weapon.

[Username]

I’m surprised with all this gun talk no one brought up the H&K Benelli M1 Super 90. I’m haven’t gone gun shopping for a while and I’m not sure if they are still legal to purchase in California. That is one of the finest weapons I own. I got the extender tube so it holds 7 in the tube, 1 in the loading gate and 1 in the chamber making a total of 9 12 gauge rounds fired as fast as you can pull the trigger. It’s gas operated so there is very little lift and with the ghost rings that came on it you don’t lose any vision. If you really want to over do it there’s the M3 version which is both semi auto and pump, but the M1 semi auto is a great weapon.

[Username]

Why would they steal her money when the Gov’t is already stealing all of our money and giving it to these greedy shortsighted banks?

[Username]

Why would they steal her money when the Gov’t is already stealing all of our money and giving it to these greedy shortsighted banks?

[Username]

Why would they steal her money when the Gov’t is already stealing all of our money and giving it to these greedy shortsighted banks?

[Username]

Why would they steal her money when the Gov’t is already stealing all of our money and giving it to these greedy shortsighted banks?

[Username]

Why would they steal her money when the Gov’t is already stealing all of our money and giving it to these greedy shortsighted banks?

[Username]

Svelte, please read and understand civil code 1950.5. If 21 days goes by and you do not recieve anything from the landlord you must first ask for your deposit by calling them, then back write a letter (certified mail) and if they refuse to return it then take it to court for twice damages. If you simply sue them for twice the amount the judge will ask you why you did not simply ask for the money before taking them to court. I would also point out in the letter you write that you are aware of the civil code and even quote it so they have no way to claim ignorance. Then when you sue them for twice the amount plus the original deposit you will have something to show the judge to justify the need to go to court.

*This is not legal advise and I am not a lawyer*

[Username]

Svelte, please read and understand civil code 1950.5. If 21 days goes by and you do not recieve anything from the landlord you must first ask for your deposit by calling them, then back write a letter (certified mail) and if they refuse to return it then take it to court for twice damages. If you simply sue them for twice the amount the judge will ask you why you did not simply ask for the money before taking them to court. I would also point out in the letter you write that you are aware of the civil code and even quote it so they have no way to claim ignorance. Then when you sue them for twice the amount plus the original deposit you will have something to show the judge to justify the need to go to court.

*This is not legal advise and I am not a lawyer*

[Username]

Svelte, please read and understand civil code 1950.5. If 21 days goes by and you do not recieve anything from the landlord you must first ask for your deposit by calling them, then back write a letter (certified mail) and if they refuse to return it then take it to court for twice damages. If you simply sue them for twice the amount the judge will ask you why you did not simply ask for the money before taking them to court. I would also point out in the letter you write that you are aware of the civil code and even quote it so they have no way to claim ignorance. Then when you sue them for twice the amount plus the original deposit you will have something to show the judge to justify the need to go to court.

*This is not legal advise and I am not a lawyer*

[Username]

Svelte, please read and understand civil code 1950.5. If 21 days goes by and you do not recieve anything from the landlord you must first ask for your deposit by calling them, then back write a letter (certified mail) and if they refuse to return it then take it to court for twice damages. If you simply sue them for twice the amount the judge will ask you why you did not simply ask for the money before taking them to court. I would also point out in the letter you write that you are aware of the civil code and even quote it so they have no way to claim ignorance. Then when you sue them for twice the amount plus the original deposit you will have something to show the judge to justify the need to go to court.

*This is not legal advise and I am not a lawyer*

[Username]

Svelte, please read and understand civil code 1950.5. If 21 days goes by and you do not recieve anything from the landlord you must first ask for your deposit by calling them, then back write a letter (certified mail) and if they refuse to return it then take it to court for twice damages. If you simply sue them for twice the amount the judge will ask you why you did not simply ask for the money before taking them to court. I would also point out in the letter you write that you are aware of the civil code and even quote it so they have no way to claim ignorance. Then when you sue them for twice the amount plus the original deposit you will have something to show the judge to justify the need to go to court.

*This is not legal advise and I am not a lawyer*

[Username]

I’ve had to take landlords to court before to recover a security deposit. The beautiful thing about renting in California is according to Civil code 1950.5 the landlord has 21 days to give back your deposit or an itemized statement with the damages and the remaining deposit. If 21 days goes by and they do not return it and you have to take them to court you are allowed to sue them for twice the deposit plus the original damages (the problem is collecting from a deadbeat). Look up California Civil code 1950.5:

(l) The bad faith claim or retention by a landlord or the landlord’s successors in interest of the security or any portion thereof in
violation of this section, or the bad faith demand of replacement security in violation of subdivision (j), may subject the landlord or
the landlord’s successors in interest to statutory damages of up to twice the amount of the security, in addition to actual damages.

[Username]

I’ve had to take landlords to court before to recover a security deposit. The beautiful thing about renting in California is according to Civil code 1950.5 the landlord has 21 days to give back your deposit or an itemized statement with the damages and the remaining deposit. If 21 days goes by and they do not return it and you have to take them to court you are allowed to sue them for twice the deposit plus the original damages (the problem is collecting from a deadbeat). Look up California Civil code 1950.5:

(l) The bad faith claim or retention by a landlord or the landlord’s successors in interest of the security or any portion thereof in
violation of this section, or the bad faith demand of replacement security in violation of subdivision (j), may subject the landlord or
the landlord’s successors in interest to statutory damages of up to twice the amount of the security, in addition to actual damages.

[Username]

I’ve had to take landlords to court before to recover a security deposit. The beautiful thing about renting in California is according to Civil code 1950.5 the landlord has 21 days to give back your deposit or an itemized statement with the damages and the remaining deposit. If 21 days goes by and they do not return it and you have to take them to court you are allowed to sue them for twice the deposit plus the original damages (the problem is collecting from a deadbeat). Look up California Civil code 1950.5:

(l) The bad faith claim or retention by a landlord or the landlord’s successors in interest of the security or any portion thereof in
violation of this section, or the bad faith demand of replacement security in violation of subdivision (j), may subject the landlord or
the landlord’s successors in interest to statutory damages of up to twice the amount of the security, in addition to actual damages.

[Author]

Posts