Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=jficquette]Hopefully that many watch the debates.
John[/quote]
Amen brother.
Looking forward to the Veep part too.
ParticipantYou have a point, however, if the safeguards worked as they were supposed to (levees, storm swell barriers) we would not be having this conversation. Also, most of the city was not destroyed.
Finally, we need a port city in one of our largest ports. Its a matter of economic imperatives.
It might make sense to A) evaluate which places are good candidates for safeguarding B)reinforce existing safeguards and C)develop better plans for evac and preservation of economic infrastructure.
Normally I would say that the gov’t is better than me on doing this but my faith in that has waned on this particular topic.
ParticipantYou have a point, however, if the safeguards worked as they were supposed to (levees, storm swell barriers) we would not be having this conversation. Also, most of the city was not destroyed.
Finally, we need a port city in one of our largest ports. Its a matter of economic imperatives.
It might make sense to A) evaluate which places are good candidates for safeguarding B)reinforce existing safeguards and C)develop better plans for evac and preservation of economic infrastructure.
Normally I would say that the gov’t is better than me on doing this but my faith in that has waned on this particular topic.
ParticipantYou have a point, however, if the safeguards worked as they were supposed to (levees, storm swell barriers) we would not be having this conversation. Also, most of the city was not destroyed.
Finally, we need a port city in one of our largest ports. Its a matter of economic imperatives.
It might make sense to A) evaluate which places are good candidates for safeguarding B)reinforce existing safeguards and C)develop better plans for evac and preservation of economic infrastructure.
Normally I would say that the gov’t is better than me on doing this but my faith in that has waned on this particular topic.
ParticipantYou have a point, however, if the safeguards worked as they were supposed to (levees, storm swell barriers) we would not be having this conversation. Also, most of the city was not destroyed.
Finally, we need a port city in one of our largest ports. Its a matter of economic imperatives.
It might make sense to A) evaluate which places are good candidates for safeguarding B)reinforce existing safeguards and C)develop better plans for evac and preservation of economic infrastructure.
Normally I would say that the gov’t is better than me on doing this but my faith in that has waned on this particular topic.
ParticipantYou have a point, however, if the safeguards worked as they were supposed to (levees, storm swell barriers) we would not be having this conversation. Also, most of the city was not destroyed.
Finally, we need a port city in one of our largest ports. Its a matter of economic imperatives.
It might make sense to A) evaluate which places are good candidates for safeguarding B)reinforce existing safeguards and C)develop better plans for evac and preservation of economic infrastructure.
Normally I would say that the gov’t is better than me on doing this but my faith in that has waned on this particular topic.
ParticipantI am just going to throw this out here, but you could sublet it.
Maybe that’s evil but it could be funny.
Kind of like Dick Cheney.
ParticipantI am just going to throw this out here, but you could sublet it.
Maybe that’s evil but it could be funny.
Kind of like Dick Cheney.
ParticipantI am just going to throw this out here, but you could sublet it.
Maybe that’s evil but it could be funny.
Kind of like Dick Cheney.
ParticipantI am just going to throw this out here, but you could sublet it.
Maybe that’s evil but it could be funny.
Kind of like Dick Cheney.
ParticipantI am just going to throw this out here, but you could sublet it.
Maybe that’s evil but it could be funny.
Kind of like Dick Cheney.
August 30, 2008 at 1:44 PM in reply to: Sarah Palin is a brilliant pick as next VP of the US #263675Participant[quote=drunkle]at least the nov elections have finally been settled; obama vs palin.
seriously, how many posts on obama have there been? and how many on mccain? it’s only now that palin is on board that mccain is even mentioned?
president palin. one step closer to idiocracy. i can just picture my old roommate; “fuck yeah, she’s hot. i’ll vote for her!”
[/quote]
Well cmon.
She is.
Damn. I am spending too much time reading gandalf.August 30, 2008 at 1:44 PM in reply to: Sarah Palin is a brilliant pick as next VP of the US #263884Participant[quote=drunkle]at least the nov elections have finally been settled; obama vs palin.
seriously, how many posts on obama have there been? and how many on mccain? it’s only now that palin is on board that mccain is even mentioned?
president palin. one step closer to idiocracy. i can just picture my old roommate; “fuck yeah, she’s hot. i’ll vote for her!”
[/quote]
Well cmon.
She is.
Damn. I am spending too much time reading gandalf.August 30, 2008 at 1:44 PM in reply to: Sarah Palin is a brilliant pick as next VP of the US #263887Participant[quote=drunkle]at least the nov elections have finally been settled; obama vs palin.
seriously, how many posts on obama have there been? and how many on mccain? it’s only now that palin is on board that mccain is even mentioned?
president palin. one step closer to idiocracy. i can just picture my old roommate; “fuck yeah, she’s hot. i’ll vote for her!”
[/quote]
Well cmon.
She is.
Damn. I am spending too much time reading gandalf. -
AuthorPosts
