Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
urbanrealtor
ParticipantREI and GI Joe surplus are where I find that kind of stuff.
September 29, 2008 at 9:03 PM in reply to: Off Topic Clip of Peloski’s speech that cratered deal. She should resign. #277914urbanrealtor
ParticipantTo ricechex:
props to you on having the nads to criticize state employees and say you are one. I respect that.To John:
Not sure you can really blame a vote on a speech. If anyone really voted based on that they have bigger problems.
Also, did you actually talk about 5th graders giving blowjobs???!!! Dude….September 29, 2008 at 9:03 PM in reply to: Off Topic Clip of Peloski’s speech that cratered deal. She should resign. #278177urbanrealtor
ParticipantTo ricechex:
props to you on having the nads to criticize state employees and say you are one. I respect that.To John:
Not sure you can really blame a vote on a speech. If anyone really voted based on that they have bigger problems.
Also, did you actually talk about 5th graders giving blowjobs???!!! Dude….September 29, 2008 at 9:03 PM in reply to: Off Topic Clip of Peloski’s speech that cratered deal. She should resign. #278191urbanrealtor
ParticipantTo ricechex:
props to you on having the nads to criticize state employees and say you are one. I respect that.To John:
Not sure you can really blame a vote on a speech. If anyone really voted based on that they have bigger problems.
Also, did you actually talk about 5th graders giving blowjobs???!!! Dude….September 29, 2008 at 9:03 PM in reply to: Off Topic Clip of Peloski’s speech that cratered deal. She should resign. #278228urbanrealtor
ParticipantTo ricechex:
props to you on having the nads to criticize state employees and say you are one. I respect that.To John:
Not sure you can really blame a vote on a speech. If anyone really voted based on that they have bigger problems.
Also, did you actually talk about 5th graders giving blowjobs???!!! Dude….September 29, 2008 at 9:03 PM in reply to: Off Topic Clip of Peloski’s speech that cratered deal. She should resign. #278240urbanrealtor
ParticipantTo ricechex:
props to you on having the nads to criticize state employees and say you are one. I respect that.To John:
Not sure you can really blame a vote on a speech. If anyone really voted based on that they have bigger problems.
Also, did you actually talk about 5th graders giving blowjobs???!!! Dude….urbanrealtor
ParticipantHe may be a hero.
He talks his beliefs when they are not popular.
However, despite his belief of what is and what should be, economic management is a big part of the job of policy-makers.
We’ll see what happens.Historically, when people get run over by the market, they tend to react politically.
How many times was FDR re-elected?
urbanrealtor
ParticipantHe may be a hero.
He talks his beliefs when they are not popular.
However, despite his belief of what is and what should be, economic management is a big part of the job of policy-makers.
We’ll see what happens.Historically, when people get run over by the market, they tend to react politically.
How many times was FDR re-elected?
urbanrealtor
ParticipantHe may be a hero.
He talks his beliefs when they are not popular.
However, despite his belief of what is and what should be, economic management is a big part of the job of policy-makers.
We’ll see what happens.Historically, when people get run over by the market, they tend to react politically.
How many times was FDR re-elected?
urbanrealtor
ParticipantHe may be a hero.
He talks his beliefs when they are not popular.
However, despite his belief of what is and what should be, economic management is a big part of the job of policy-makers.
We’ll see what happens.Historically, when people get run over by the market, they tend to react politically.
How many times was FDR re-elected?
urbanrealtor
ParticipantHe may be a hero.
He talks his beliefs when they are not popular.
However, despite his belief of what is and what should be, economic management is a big part of the job of policy-makers.
We’ll see what happens.Historically, when people get run over by the market, they tend to react politically.
How many times was FDR re-elected?
September 28, 2008 at 5:22 PM in reply to: Bush administration sees 4000-point drop in DOW this week if no bailout #276778urbanrealtor
ParticipantI think you made a pretty compelling argument.
I would like to see a better argument both for and against the bailout package.
Specifically, I am sure that leading policy-makers have a counter suggestion or see a flaw to your version but to date I have not seen one.
I really think transparency and open source of policy is important here and I am not seeing any of it.
For example if the issue of banks failing will have catastrophic effects, what exactly to the policy makers see those effects as being?
What will the dramatic increase in debt ceiling mean as far as service to the debt or as far as credit rating?
What does this do to our national cash flow?
Will we have to raise taxes dramatically?I would like to see a model of projected outcomes.
Maybe something like those weird hurricane projections the news has before storms.Sort of “If we do nothing, here are the likely or possible results.”
Again, I find the big guys’ consensus compelling and interesting but I really feel that the communication to the public has been poor and unhelpful.
Good post dude.
September 28, 2008 at 5:22 PM in reply to: Bush administration sees 4000-point drop in DOW this week if no bailout #277035urbanrealtor
ParticipantI think you made a pretty compelling argument.
I would like to see a better argument both for and against the bailout package.
Specifically, I am sure that leading policy-makers have a counter suggestion or see a flaw to your version but to date I have not seen one.
I really think transparency and open source of policy is important here and I am not seeing any of it.
For example if the issue of banks failing will have catastrophic effects, what exactly to the policy makers see those effects as being?
What will the dramatic increase in debt ceiling mean as far as service to the debt or as far as credit rating?
What does this do to our national cash flow?
Will we have to raise taxes dramatically?I would like to see a model of projected outcomes.
Maybe something like those weird hurricane projections the news has before storms.Sort of “If we do nothing, here are the likely or possible results.”
Again, I find the big guys’ consensus compelling and interesting but I really feel that the communication to the public has been poor and unhelpful.
Good post dude.
September 28, 2008 at 5:22 PM in reply to: Bush administration sees 4000-point drop in DOW this week if no bailout #277052urbanrealtor
ParticipantI think you made a pretty compelling argument.
I would like to see a better argument both for and against the bailout package.
Specifically, I am sure that leading policy-makers have a counter suggestion or see a flaw to your version but to date I have not seen one.
I really think transparency and open source of policy is important here and I am not seeing any of it.
For example if the issue of banks failing will have catastrophic effects, what exactly to the policy makers see those effects as being?
What will the dramatic increase in debt ceiling mean as far as service to the debt or as far as credit rating?
What does this do to our national cash flow?
Will we have to raise taxes dramatically?I would like to see a model of projected outcomes.
Maybe something like those weird hurricane projections the news has before storms.Sort of “If we do nothing, here are the likely or possible results.”
Again, I find the big guys’ consensus compelling and interesting but I really feel that the communication to the public has been poor and unhelpful.
Good post dude.
-
AuthorPosts
