Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
urbanrealtor
ParticipantIf it were my listing, you would not have gotten this far without doing an inspection (and removing inspection contingencies).
The seller and his agent likely did a lot of work for no reason if the property has significant damage or issues.
If you can document those issues (with an inspection report and multiple bids) there is some possibility that the short sale lien holder will allow a price reduction.
It is very unlikely that anyone will either fix it or give you a credit.
You should get the info from the inspection report and then contact appropriate contractors to bid before approaching them about cost reduction.Sometimes if it is a minor repair (eg: carpet cleaning or painting) the agents will pay for it.
However, the nature of a short sale is that there really is no extra money anywhere.
Participant[quote=Jazzman]The issues is not ‘pending’, but ‘pending do NOT continue to show’, which apparently removes the listing, sometimes prematurely, thereby not allowing back up offers. Is there a record of this happening that other brokers can see?[/quote]
Typically, the free sites have somewhat limited access to listings other than active and sold (they are not the actual MLS).
Sometimes properties are intentionally blocked from public sites (at the suggestion of sellers, tenants, or agents) even though it is on the MLS.
However usually, if a property is invisible, it is because it is withdrawn.
That blocks it from virtually everybody.
Withdrawn is a status that means there is an active listing agreement but some body (agent, seller, tenant) does not want it shown as active on the MLS.
Very common in rental properties.
Not very common in shorts (as far as I have seen).It is possible that it is fraudulent (in the real meaning, not CAR’s crazy person version) but your description does not give enough information to glean that.
Post the address and I could tell you more definitively.
Participant[quote=Jazzman]The issues is not ‘pending’, but ‘pending do NOT continue to show’, which apparently removes the listing, sometimes prematurely, thereby not allowing back up offers. Is there a record of this happening that other brokers can see?[/quote]
Typically, the free sites have somewhat limited access to listings other than active and sold (they are not the actual MLS).
Sometimes properties are intentionally blocked from public sites (at the suggestion of sellers, tenants, or agents) even though it is on the MLS.
However usually, if a property is invisible, it is because it is withdrawn.
That blocks it from virtually everybody.
Withdrawn is a status that means there is an active listing agreement but some body (agent, seller, tenant) does not want it shown as active on the MLS.
Very common in rental properties.
Not very common in shorts (as far as I have seen).It is possible that it is fraudulent (in the real meaning, not CAR’s crazy person version) but your description does not give enough information to glean that.
Post the address and I could tell you more definitively.
Participant[quote=Jazzman]The issues is not ‘pending’, but ‘pending do NOT continue to show’, which apparently removes the listing, sometimes prematurely, thereby not allowing back up offers. Is there a record of this happening that other brokers can see?[/quote]
Typically, the free sites have somewhat limited access to listings other than active and sold (they are not the actual MLS).
Sometimes properties are intentionally blocked from public sites (at the suggestion of sellers, tenants, or agents) even though it is on the MLS.
However usually, if a property is invisible, it is because it is withdrawn.
That blocks it from virtually everybody.
Withdrawn is a status that means there is an active listing agreement but some body (agent, seller, tenant) does not want it shown as active on the MLS.
Very common in rental properties.
Not very common in shorts (as far as I have seen).It is possible that it is fraudulent (in the real meaning, not CAR’s crazy person version) but your description does not give enough information to glean that.
Post the address and I could tell you more definitively.
Participant[quote=Jazzman]The issues is not ‘pending’, but ‘pending do NOT continue to show’, which apparently removes the listing, sometimes prematurely, thereby not allowing back up offers. Is there a record of this happening that other brokers can see?[/quote]
Typically, the free sites have somewhat limited access to listings other than active and sold (they are not the actual MLS).
Sometimes properties are intentionally blocked from public sites (at the suggestion of sellers, tenants, or agents) even though it is on the MLS.
However usually, if a property is invisible, it is because it is withdrawn.
That blocks it from virtually everybody.
Withdrawn is a status that means there is an active listing agreement but some body (agent, seller, tenant) does not want it shown as active on the MLS.
Very common in rental properties.
Not very common in shorts (as far as I have seen).It is possible that it is fraudulent (in the real meaning, not CAR’s crazy person version) but your description does not give enough information to glean that.
Post the address and I could tell you more definitively.
Participant[quote=Jazzman]The issues is not ‘pending’, but ‘pending do NOT continue to show’, which apparently removes the listing, sometimes prematurely, thereby not allowing back up offers. Is there a record of this happening that other brokers can see?[/quote]
Typically, the free sites have somewhat limited access to listings other than active and sold (they are not the actual MLS).
Sometimes properties are intentionally blocked from public sites (at the suggestion of sellers, tenants, or agents) even though it is on the MLS.
However usually, if a property is invisible, it is because it is withdrawn.
That blocks it from virtually everybody.
Withdrawn is a status that means there is an active listing agreement but some body (agent, seller, tenant) does not want it shown as active on the MLS.
Very common in rental properties.
Not very common in shorts (as far as I have seen).It is possible that it is fraudulent (in the real meaning, not CAR’s crazy person version) but your description does not give enough information to glean that.
Post the address and I could tell you more definitively.
Participant[quote=paramount]More proof that fascism is here, alive and well in the United States.[/quote]
The actions described here were neither nationalist nor radical.
It was simply bullying on the part of a disorganized bank and there comeuppance in court and with the sheriff.
Participant[quote=paramount]More proof that fascism is here, alive and well in the United States.[/quote]
The actions described here were neither nationalist nor radical.
It was simply bullying on the part of a disorganized bank and there comeuppance in court and with the sheriff.
Participant[quote=paramount]More proof that fascism is here, alive and well in the United States.[/quote]
The actions described here were neither nationalist nor radical.
It was simply bullying on the part of a disorganized bank and there comeuppance in court and with the sheriff.
Participant[quote=paramount]More proof that fascism is here, alive and well in the United States.[/quote]
The actions described here were neither nationalist nor radical.
It was simply bullying on the part of a disorganized bank and there comeuppance in court and with the sheriff.
Participant[quote=paramount]More proof that fascism is here, alive and well in the United States.[/quote]
The actions described here were neither nationalist nor radical.
It was simply bullying on the part of a disorganized bank and there comeuppance in court and with the sheriff.
June 6, 2011 at 6:20 PM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #701461Participant[quote=afx114]I’m voting for the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.[/quote]
I may actually re-register republican just to help Santorum and Palin win.At the very least I will know I have a year of good humor to look forward to.
Wash-River 2012 “I am a leaf on the wind”
Santorum-Savage 2016 “For a GGG and Frothy America”
Beck-Moore 2020 “Keeping everything crazy and simple”
Weiner-Franke “America Standing Erect and Proud”
Lereah-Toscano “Reconciling Blind Faith and Hard Sanity”Just some ideas.
June 6, 2011 at 6:20 PM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #702054Participant[quote=afx114]I’m voting for the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.[/quote]
I may actually re-register republican just to help Santorum and Palin win.At the very least I will know I have a year of good humor to look forward to.
Wash-River 2012 “I am a leaf on the wind”
Santorum-Savage 2016 “For a GGG and Frothy America”
Beck-Moore 2020 “Keeping everything crazy and simple”
Weiner-Franke “America Standing Erect and Proud”
Lereah-Toscano “Reconciling Blind Faith and Hard Sanity”Just some ideas.
June 6, 2011 at 6:20 PM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #702203Participant[quote=afx114]I’m voting for the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.[/quote]
I may actually re-register republican just to help Santorum and Palin win.At the very least I will know I have a year of good humor to look forward to.
Wash-River 2012 “I am a leaf on the wind”
Santorum-Savage 2016 “For a GGG and Frothy America”
Beck-Moore 2020 “Keeping everything crazy and simple”
Weiner-Franke “America Standing Erect and Proud”
Lereah-Toscano “Reconciling Blind Faith and Hard Sanity”Just some ideas.
-
AuthorPosts
