Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=Russell][quote=urbanrealtor]Bump
I need reviews and comments..[/quote]
It all sucked!Primus sucks![/quote]
Primus?Whats the hatred of Les Claypool about?
ParticipantAll of the above are true.
A couple of other caveats:
The seller must accede to any buyer payout.
By law, they are the one paying the commission and even if a buyer was represented by a buyer agent, the seller has to approve the payout.
This can be really problematic in cases where the buyer and seller negotiations get tense or acrimonious.
Also, the rebate needs to be disclosed on the HUD statement.
If it is not, potentially the parties are acting illegally (though it may not be worth prosecuting).
ParticipantAll of the above are true.
A couple of other caveats:
The seller must accede to any buyer payout.
By law, they are the one paying the commission and even if a buyer was represented by a buyer agent, the seller has to approve the payout.
This can be really problematic in cases where the buyer and seller negotiations get tense or acrimonious.
Also, the rebate needs to be disclosed on the HUD statement.
If it is not, potentially the parties are acting illegally (though it may not be worth prosecuting).
ParticipantAll of the above are true.
A couple of other caveats:
The seller must accede to any buyer payout.
By law, they are the one paying the commission and even if a buyer was represented by a buyer agent, the seller has to approve the payout.
This can be really problematic in cases where the buyer and seller negotiations get tense or acrimonious.
Also, the rebate needs to be disclosed on the HUD statement.
If it is not, potentially the parties are acting illegally (though it may not be worth prosecuting).
ParticipantAll of the above are true.
A couple of other caveats:
The seller must accede to any buyer payout.
By law, they are the one paying the commission and even if a buyer was represented by a buyer agent, the seller has to approve the payout.
This can be really problematic in cases where the buyer and seller negotiations get tense or acrimonious.
Also, the rebate needs to be disclosed on the HUD statement.
If it is not, potentially the parties are acting illegally (though it may not be worth prosecuting).
ParticipantAll of the above are true.
A couple of other caveats:
The seller must accede to any buyer payout.
By law, they are the one paying the commission and even if a buyer was represented by a buyer agent, the seller has to approve the payout.
This can be really problematic in cases where the buyer and seller negotiations get tense or acrimonious.
Also, the rebate needs to be disclosed on the HUD statement.
If it is not, potentially the parties are acting illegally (though it may not be worth prosecuting).
ParticipantNo kidding.
I just wish they would use risk models that appear more rational to go with that caution.ParticipantNo kidding.
I just wish they would use risk models that appear more rational to go with that caution.ParticipantNo kidding.
I just wish they would use risk models that appear more rational to go with that caution.ParticipantNo kidding.
I just wish they would use risk models that appear more rational to go with that caution.ParticipantNo kidding.
I just wish they would use risk models that appear more rational to go with that caution.ParticipantJP:
Perhaps I need to see what you are seeing.What areas are you seeing examples of what you describe and what is your definition of stealth inventory.
A lot of stuff that registers as non-paying is in the middle of HUD-sponsored mods.
I have encountered this several times when mining the NOD’s.
It is pretty unlikely that these ones (again I don’t have numbers on how many) will end up as REOs.
I have seen numbers that suggest consumer debt has slowed or decreased.
(eg: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/+THE+GREAT+ADJUSTMENT+IS+WELL+UNDER+WAY-a01611840309)At an anecdotal level, I am seeing only certain restaurants increase in business.
Specifically those with much lower prices.
I don’t see a lot of people wasting discretionary income but maybe I need to see where you are experiencing this.
ParticipantJP:
Perhaps I need to see what you are seeing.What areas are you seeing examples of what you describe and what is your definition of stealth inventory.
A lot of stuff that registers as non-paying is in the middle of HUD-sponsored mods.
I have encountered this several times when mining the NOD’s.
It is pretty unlikely that these ones (again I don’t have numbers on how many) will end up as REOs.
I have seen numbers that suggest consumer debt has slowed or decreased.
(eg: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/+THE+GREAT+ADJUSTMENT+IS+WELL+UNDER+WAY-a01611840309)At an anecdotal level, I am seeing only certain restaurants increase in business.
Specifically those with much lower prices.
I don’t see a lot of people wasting discretionary income but maybe I need to see where you are experiencing this.
ParticipantJP:
Perhaps I need to see what you are seeing.What areas are you seeing examples of what you describe and what is your definition of stealth inventory.
A lot of stuff that registers as non-paying is in the middle of HUD-sponsored mods.
I have encountered this several times when mining the NOD’s.
It is pretty unlikely that these ones (again I don’t have numbers on how many) will end up as REOs.
I have seen numbers that suggest consumer debt has slowed or decreased.
(eg: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/+THE+GREAT+ADJUSTMENT+IS+WELL+UNDER+WAY-a01611840309)At an anecdotal level, I am seeing only certain restaurants increase in business.
Specifically those with much lower prices.
I don’t see a lot of people wasting discretionary income but maybe I need to see where you are experiencing this.
-
AuthorPosts
