[urbanrealtor]

[quote=RaeAnne]Buyers who were cut loose by Vantage Point now have the option of buying at Aria which is in the same neighborhood of Cortez Hill and is an absolutely gorgeous building. I just read an article about the property in the SDBJ and recently toured there. It’s a lovely building with fantastic prices and a great alternative for those out of Vantage Point. Check out http://aria-sandiego.com – the views are spectacular!! [/quote]

Where are you getting this info?
I just closed one in aria and yes they are just absolutely the shiznat.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=RaeAnne]Buyers who were cut loose by Vantage Point now have the option of buying at Aria which is in the same neighborhood of Cortez Hill and is an absolutely gorgeous building. I just read an article about the property in the SDBJ and recently toured there. It’s a lovely building with fantastic prices and a great alternative for those out of Vantage Point. Check out http://aria-sandiego.com – the views are spectacular!! [/quote]

Where are you getting this info?
I just closed one in aria and yes they are just absolutely the shiznat.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=ocrenter]I think the friend is not giving you proper info. likely playing up their victimhood to gain sympathy. foreclosure remains a 4-6 months process in California, they have likely been living mortgage-free and rent-free for some time now.[/quote]

Tru dat.

I don’t buy that tale at all.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=ocrenter]I think the friend is not giving you proper info. likely playing up their victimhood to gain sympathy. foreclosure remains a 4-6 months process in California, they have likely been living mortgage-free and rent-free for some time now.[/quote]

Tru dat.

I don’t buy that tale at all.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=ocrenter]I think the friend is not giving you proper info. likely playing up their victimhood to gain sympathy. foreclosure remains a 4-6 months process in California, they have likely been living mortgage-free and rent-free for some time now.[/quote]

Tru dat.

I don’t buy that tale at all.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=ocrenter]I think the friend is not giving you proper info. likely playing up their victimhood to gain sympathy. foreclosure remains a 4-6 months process in California, they have likely been living mortgage-free and rent-free for some time now.[/quote]

Tru dat.

I don’t buy that tale at all.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=ocrenter]I think the friend is not giving you proper info. likely playing up their victimhood to gain sympathy. foreclosure remains a 4-6 months process in California, they have likely been living mortgage-free and rent-free for some time now.[/quote]

Tru dat.

I don’t buy that tale at all.

[urbanrealtor]

As long as they do not make false statements that an interested party relies upon (to their detriment), I don’t think it is fraud.

Most but not all banks require that all parties sign something saying that this is an arm’s length transaction and that the buyer and seller are not related.

If they don’t lie and are honest (which often does not require showing the highest offer), then I think it is probably legal.

It is questionable in my opinion but I am not sure your disappointment constitutes illegality.

Also, contingent and pending are not the same.

My sympathies dude.

[urbanrealtor]

As long as they do not make false statements that an interested party relies upon (to their detriment), I don’t think it is fraud.

Most but not all banks require that all parties sign something saying that this is an arm’s length transaction and that the buyer and seller are not related.

If they don’t lie and are honest (which often does not require showing the highest offer), then I think it is probably legal.

It is questionable in my opinion but I am not sure your disappointment constitutes illegality.

Also, contingent and pending are not the same.

My sympathies dude.

[urbanrealtor]

As long as they do not make false statements that an interested party relies upon (to their detriment), I don’t think it is fraud.

Most but not all banks require that all parties sign something saying that this is an arm’s length transaction and that the buyer and seller are not related.

If they don’t lie and are honest (which often does not require showing the highest offer), then I think it is probably legal.

It is questionable in my opinion but I am not sure your disappointment constitutes illegality.

Also, contingent and pending are not the same.

My sympathies dude.

[urbanrealtor]

As long as they do not make false statements that an interested party relies upon (to their detriment), I don’t think it is fraud.

Most but not all banks require that all parties sign something saying that this is an arm’s length transaction and that the buyer and seller are not related.

If they don’t lie and are honest (which often does not require showing the highest offer), then I think it is probably legal.

It is questionable in my opinion but I am not sure your disappointment constitutes illegality.

Also, contingent and pending are not the same.

My sympathies dude.

[urbanrealtor]

As long as they do not make false statements that an interested party relies upon (to their detriment), I don’t think it is fraud.

Most but not all banks require that all parties sign something saying that this is an arm’s length transaction and that the buyer and seller are not related.

If they don’t lie and are honest (which often does not require showing the highest offer), then I think it is probably legal.

It is questionable in my opinion but I am not sure your disappointment constitutes illegality.

Also, contingent and pending are not the same.

My sympathies dude.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=toots]In short sale negotiations, how advantageous is an all cash offer (a reasonable offer)?[/quote]
In my experience, the primary benefit in all cash is the sureness of closing. That is less of a component in short sales.

In short I find it to be of very little advantage.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=toots]In short sale negotiations, how advantageous is an all cash offer (a reasonable offer)?[/quote]
In my experience, the primary benefit in all cash is the sureness of closing. That is less of a component in short sales.

In short I find it to be of very little advantage.

[urbanrealtor]

[quote=toots]In short sale negotiations, how advantageous is an all cash offer (a reasonable offer)?[/quote]
In my experience, the primary benefit in all cash is the sureness of closing. That is less of a component in short sales.

In short I find it to be of very little advantage.

[Author]

Posts