[surveyor]

liberal think

Sorry Concho, you are clearly excusing the action of the pirate criminals by putting up an example of a provocation for these criminals, using the example as a means to equate the crime of the perpetrator and the victim, or to describe extenuating circumstances that relieve the responsibility of the perpetrators. It is classic misdirection.

You say that you’re not excusing the behavior of the pirates, but two sentences later, you actually mention that the criminality “started” with Europe.

[surveyor]

liberal think

Sorry Concho, you are clearly excusing the action of the pirate criminals by putting up an example of a provocation for these criminals, using the example as a means to equate the crime of the perpetrator and the victim, or to describe extenuating circumstances that relieve the responsibility of the perpetrators. It is classic misdirection.

You say that you’re not excusing the behavior of the pirates, but two sentences later, you actually mention that the criminality “started” with Europe.

[surveyor]

liberal think

Sorry Concho, you are clearly excusing the action of the pirate criminals by putting up an example of a provocation for these criminals, using the example as a means to equate the crime of the perpetrator and the victim, or to describe extenuating circumstances that relieve the responsibility of the perpetrators. It is classic misdirection.

You say that you’re not excusing the behavior of the pirates, but two sentences later, you actually mention that the criminality “started” with Europe.

[surveyor]

liberal think

Sorry Concho, you are clearly excusing the action of the pirate criminals by putting up an example of a provocation for these criminals, using the example as a means to equate the crime of the perpetrator and the victim, or to describe extenuating circumstances that relieve the responsibility of the perpetrators. It is classic misdirection.

You say that you’re not excusing the behavior of the pirates, but two sentences later, you actually mention that the criminality “started” with Europe.

[surveyor]

[quote=waiting for bottom][quote=DataAgent]1. Have a non-working spouse start a home-based business. Most businesses show taxable losses the first few years.
2. Buy a rental property. Even if you break-even with your cash flow, you can still depreciate the property creating a taxable loss.

[/quote]

Careful on the rental property. If you have more than $150K of AGI – no write off for you![/quote]

Please google “real estate professional tax deduction”.

Then $150k of AGI don’t matter.

[surveyor]

[quote=waiting for bottom][quote=DataAgent]1. Have a non-working spouse start a home-based business. Most businesses show taxable losses the first few years.
2. Buy a rental property. Even if you break-even with your cash flow, you can still depreciate the property creating a taxable loss.

[/quote]

Careful on the rental property. If you have more than $150K of AGI – no write off for you![/quote]

Please google “real estate professional tax deduction”.

Then $150k of AGI don’t matter.

[surveyor]

[quote=waiting for bottom][quote=DataAgent]1. Have a non-working spouse start a home-based business. Most businesses show taxable losses the first few years.
2. Buy a rental property. Even if you break-even with your cash flow, you can still depreciate the property creating a taxable loss.

[/quote]

Careful on the rental property. If you have more than $150K of AGI – no write off for you![/quote]

Please google “real estate professional tax deduction”.

Then $150k of AGI don’t matter.

[surveyor]

[quote=waiting for bottom][quote=DataAgent]1. Have a non-working spouse start a home-based business. Most businesses show taxable losses the first few years.
2. Buy a rental property. Even if you break-even with your cash flow, you can still depreciate the property creating a taxable loss.

[/quote]

Careful on the rental property. If you have more than $150K of AGI – no write off for you![/quote]

Please google “real estate professional tax deduction”.

Then $150k of AGI don’t matter.

[surveyor]

[quote=waiting for bottom][quote=DataAgent]1. Have a non-working spouse start a home-based business. Most businesses show taxable losses the first few years.
2. Buy a rental property. Even if you break-even with your cash flow, you can still depreciate the property creating a taxable loss.

[/quote]

Careful on the rental property. If you have more than $150K of AGI – no write off for you![/quote]

Please google “real estate professional tax deduction”.

Then $150k of AGI don’t matter.

[surveyor]

[quote=CONCHO]How dare they protest against having their seas looted of fish and used as nuclear waste dumps by the Europeans. Don’t they realize they’re Africans? After 500 years, you think they’d know their place by now.[/quote]

I would take their claims of nuclear waste dumping (and other fanatical claims as well) with a grain of NaCL because these are the people who refuse vaccinations on the idea that the U.S. is giving them AIDS.

[surveyor]

[quote=CONCHO]How dare they protest against having their seas looted of fish and used as nuclear waste dumps by the Europeans. Don’t they realize they’re Africans? After 500 years, you think they’d know their place by now.[/quote]

I would take their claims of nuclear waste dumping (and other fanatical claims as well) with a grain of NaCL because these are the people who refuse vaccinations on the idea that the U.S. is giving them AIDS.

[surveyor]

[quote=CONCHO]How dare they protest against having their seas looted of fish and used as nuclear waste dumps by the Europeans. Don’t they realize they’re Africans? After 500 years, you think they’d know their place by now.[/quote]

I would take their claims of nuclear waste dumping (and other fanatical claims as well) with a grain of NaCL because these are the people who refuse vaccinations on the idea that the U.S. is giving them AIDS.

[surveyor]

[quote=CONCHO]How dare they protest against having their seas looted of fish and used as nuclear waste dumps by the Europeans. Don’t they realize they’re Africans? After 500 years, you think they’d know their place by now.[/quote]

I would take their claims of nuclear waste dumping (and other fanatical claims as well) with a grain of NaCL because these are the people who refuse vaccinations on the idea that the U.S. is giving them AIDS.

[surveyor]

[quote=CONCHO]How dare they protest against having their seas looted of fish and used as nuclear waste dumps by the Europeans. Don’t they realize they’re Africans? After 500 years, you think they’d know their place by now.[/quote]

I would take their claims of nuclear waste dumping (and other fanatical claims as well) with a grain of NaCL because these are the people who refuse vaccinations on the idea that the U.S. is giving them AIDS.

[surveyor]

Obama

My opinion of Obama has gotten lower and lower every day of his presidency. And it was pretty low to begin with.

[Author]

Posts