Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sdduuuude
Participant“Environmentally Sensitive” labels might burn you, too.
Participant“Environmentally Sensitive” labels might burn you, too.
Participant“Environmentally Sensitive” labels might burn you, too.
ParticipantWell put Rustico.
Along those lines, this lot may be big enough to allow a second rental structure. Seems there is some rule about that in Clairemont. I heard this from a realtor in 2005 when I was selling in the area. I was never in a position to care so I never tracked it down.
She said you can build a second structure on the property and rent it out if the main structure is your primary residence and the lot is > 10,000 sq. ft.
Can anyone confirm / debunk this ?
While I was on the property, I didn’t think Balboa Avenue detracted from the canyon property at all, and the lot is really big with alot of flat, usable space so I don’t think it compares to the standard 3/2 houses in the area.
ParticipantWell put Rustico.
Along those lines, this lot may be big enough to allow a second rental structure. Seems there is some rule about that in Clairemont. I heard this from a realtor in 2005 when I was selling in the area. I was never in a position to care so I never tracked it down.
She said you can build a second structure on the property and rent it out if the main structure is your primary residence and the lot is > 10,000 sq. ft.
Can anyone confirm / debunk this ?
While I was on the property, I didn’t think Balboa Avenue detracted from the canyon property at all, and the lot is really big with alot of flat, usable space so I don’t think it compares to the standard 3/2 houses in the area.
ParticipantWell put Rustico.
Along those lines, this lot may be big enough to allow a second rental structure. Seems there is some rule about that in Clairemont. I heard this from a realtor in 2005 when I was selling in the area. I was never in a position to care so I never tracked it down.
She said you can build a second structure on the property and rent it out if the main structure is your primary residence and the lot is > 10,000 sq. ft.
Can anyone confirm / debunk this ?
While I was on the property, I didn’t think Balboa Avenue detracted from the canyon property at all, and the lot is really big with alot of flat, usable space so I don’t think it compares to the standard 3/2 houses in the area.
ParticipantWell put Rustico.
Along those lines, this lot may be big enough to allow a second rental structure. Seems there is some rule about that in Clairemont. I heard this from a realtor in 2005 when I was selling in the area. I was never in a position to care so I never tracked it down.
She said you can build a second structure on the property and rent it out if the main structure is your primary residence and the lot is > 10,000 sq. ft.
Can anyone confirm / debunk this ?
While I was on the property, I didn’t think Balboa Avenue detracted from the canyon property at all, and the lot is really big with alot of flat, usable space so I don’t think it compares to the standard 3/2 houses in the area.
ParticipantWell put Rustico.
Along those lines, this lot may be big enough to allow a second rental structure. Seems there is some rule about that in Clairemont. I heard this from a realtor in 2005 when I was selling in the area. I was never in a position to care so I never tracked it down.
She said you can build a second structure on the property and rent it out if the main structure is your primary residence and the lot is > 10,000 sq. ft.
Can anyone confirm / debunk this ?
While I was on the property, I didn’t think Balboa Avenue detracted from the canyon property at all, and the lot is really big with alot of flat, usable space so I don’t think it compares to the standard 3/2 houses in the area.
ParticipantRustico – a year from now, maybe two makes more sense.
Also, this would be a better place to live than to rent out. I don’t think you get the “canyon premium” rent that you do when you buy so you pay extra to buy the canyon lot but don’t get the rental income back out of it.
Would be nice to see two or three of these sit for a while before getting offers. Then again, it’s a little close to home for me – literally – and one at a time is enough !
Dying to see how much someone paid for this one, and to see if those other new prudential listings are REO.
Must have been good if the agent put it into escrow already and isn’t waiting for something better.
Hey beachy, what did you offer ?
ParticipantRustico – a year from now, maybe two makes more sense.
Also, this would be a better place to live than to rent out. I don’t think you get the “canyon premium” rent that you do when you buy so you pay extra to buy the canyon lot but don’t get the rental income back out of it.
Would be nice to see two or three of these sit for a while before getting offers. Then again, it’s a little close to home for me – literally – and one at a time is enough !
Dying to see how much someone paid for this one, and to see if those other new prudential listings are REO.
Must have been good if the agent put it into escrow already and isn’t waiting for something better.
Hey beachy, what did you offer ?
ParticipantRustico – a year from now, maybe two makes more sense.
Also, this would be a better place to live than to rent out. I don’t think you get the “canyon premium” rent that you do when you buy so you pay extra to buy the canyon lot but don’t get the rental income back out of it.
Would be nice to see two or three of these sit for a while before getting offers. Then again, it’s a little close to home for me – literally – and one at a time is enough !
Dying to see how much someone paid for this one, and to see if those other new prudential listings are REO.
Must have been good if the agent put it into escrow already and isn’t waiting for something better.
Hey beachy, what did you offer ?
ParticipantRustico – a year from now, maybe two makes more sense.
Also, this would be a better place to live than to rent out. I don’t think you get the “canyon premium” rent that you do when you buy so you pay extra to buy the canyon lot but don’t get the rental income back out of it.
Would be nice to see two or three of these sit for a while before getting offers. Then again, it’s a little close to home for me – literally – and one at a time is enough !
Dying to see how much someone paid for this one, and to see if those other new prudential listings are REO.
Must have been good if the agent put it into escrow already and isn’t waiting for something better.
Hey beachy, what did you offer ?
ParticipantRustico – a year from now, maybe two makes more sense.
Also, this would be a better place to live than to rent out. I don’t think you get the “canyon premium” rent that you do when you buy so you pay extra to buy the canyon lot but don’t get the rental income back out of it.
Would be nice to see two or three of these sit for a while before getting offers. Then again, it’s a little close to home for me – literally – and one at a time is enough !
Dying to see how much someone paid for this one, and to see if those other new prudential listings are REO.
Must have been good if the agent put it into escrow already and isn’t waiting for something better.
Hey beachy, what did you offer ?
ParticipantRustico,
I think it’s a better flip than a rent and hold. I’d rather get out of it quickly – before Summer ends – as I suspect there is still room to fall in this area, especially on the canyon lots.
I look at the canyon lots in Clairmont as almost a different market from the non-canyon lots.
The standard clairemont Mt. Street home (3/2, 1250 sq. ft on a 5-6,000 sq. ft lot) has come down quite a bit – maybe 15% from $525K or so. But the canyon lots are behaving more like Carmel Valley than Temecula and have been retaining their value a bit better and there aren’t many up for sale either.
-
AuthorPosts
