Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 30, 2009 at 12:26 PM in reply to: OT: Addendum to “I Have the Pu**y…” thread – Ladder Theory #475939October 30, 2009 at 12:26 PM in reply to: OT: Addendum to “I Have the Pu**y…” thread – Ladder Theory #476302
sdduuuude
ParticipantThe level of detail in that theory is quite impressive.
October 30, 2009 at 12:26 PM in reply to: OT: Addendum to “I Have the Pu**y…” thread – Ladder Theory #476377ParticipantThe level of detail in that theory is quite impressive.
October 30, 2009 at 12:26 PM in reply to: OT: Addendum to “I Have the Pu**y…” thread – Ladder Theory #476604ParticipantThe level of detail in that theory is quite impressive.
ParticipantBump. This is awesome and surely got lost in the “I have the ____, I make the rules” threads. Worth a look.
ParticipantBump. This is awesome and surely got lost in the “I have the ____, I make the rules” threads. Worth a look.
ParticipantBump. This is awesome and surely got lost in the “I have the ____, I make the rules” threads. Worth a look.
ParticipantBump. This is awesome and surely got lost in the “I have the ____, I make the rules” threads. Worth a look.
ParticipantBump. This is awesome and surely got lost in the “I have the ____, I make the rules” threads. Worth a look.
Participantinvestor – I like that approach, too.
I was thinking about this today and it seems that wealth isn’t just what you have, it has something to do with where you are, physically, in the world, too, and what the purchasing power of your money is. 100K in India or Mexico is different than it is here. Then again, it may be more pleasant here in some sense.
A straight calc of net-worth just seems inadequate to me. It has to be a combination of cash, assets, debt, purchasing power, freedom/time, and lifestyle.
Participantinvestor – I like that approach, too.
I was thinking about this today and it seems that wealth isn’t just what you have, it has something to do with where you are, physically, in the world, too, and what the purchasing power of your money is. 100K in India or Mexico is different than it is here. Then again, it may be more pleasant here in some sense.
A straight calc of net-worth just seems inadequate to me. It has to be a combination of cash, assets, debt, purchasing power, freedom/time, and lifestyle.
Participantinvestor – I like that approach, too.
I was thinking about this today and it seems that wealth isn’t just what you have, it has something to do with where you are, physically, in the world, too, and what the purchasing power of your money is. 100K in India or Mexico is different than it is here. Then again, it may be more pleasant here in some sense.
A straight calc of net-worth just seems inadequate to me. It has to be a combination of cash, assets, debt, purchasing power, freedom/time, and lifestyle.
Participantinvestor – I like that approach, too.
I was thinking about this today and it seems that wealth isn’t just what you have, it has something to do with where you are, physically, in the world, too, and what the purchasing power of your money is. 100K in India or Mexico is different than it is here. Then again, it may be more pleasant here in some sense.
A straight calc of net-worth just seems inadequate to me. It has to be a combination of cash, assets, debt, purchasing power, freedom/time, and lifestyle.
Participantinvestor – I like that approach, too.
I was thinking about this today and it seems that wealth isn’t just what you have, it has something to do with where you are, physically, in the world, too, and what the purchasing power of your money is. 100K in India or Mexico is different than it is here. Then again, it may be more pleasant here in some sense.
A straight calc of net-worth just seems inadequate to me. It has to be a combination of cash, assets, debt, purchasing power, freedom/time, and lifestyle.
Participant[quote=briansd1]sdduuuude, some people love to work. That’s fun for them.[/quote]
’tis true.
[quote=briansd1]But wealth is just a word to describe something just like “table” or “computer”. It’s not a philosophy of life.[/quote]
Is it not possible to have a wealth of time ?
Time is money, after all.
I do agree, though, that when calculating wealth in dollars, you have to mark you assets to market and back out the debt. Because, if you can’t use your assets to buy time, they are worthless.
I also think that wealth has to be a sustainable condition, unlike the gentleman who borrowed his way into the high-life. UCGal’s comment about free from worries suggests this idea of sustainability as well.
-
AuthorPosts
