[sdduuuude]

In the residential market, the gov. bailed out the banks by pretending to “help homeowners stay in their homes.” That’s gonna be a tough sell when it comes time to “help keep commercial real-estate owners in their commercial real estate.”

As such, this could be pretty hard on the banks cuz the gov will have a much harder time bailing them out, politically speaking.

Also gonna be tough for the owners to claim “predatory lending” when they are business people.

At this point, I hate to say I’d be surprised at anything the gov does, but, it seems a tougher challenge to bail out the banks on CRE.

[sdduuuude]

In the residential market, the gov. bailed out the banks by pretending to “help homeowners stay in their homes.” That’s gonna be a tough sell when it comes time to “help keep commercial real-estate owners in their commercial real estate.”

As such, this could be pretty hard on the banks cuz the gov will have a much harder time bailing them out, politically speaking.

Also gonna be tough for the owners to claim “predatory lending” when they are business people.

At this point, I hate to say I’d be surprised at anything the gov does, but, it seems a tougher challenge to bail out the banks on CRE.

[sdduuuude]

In the residential market, the gov. bailed out the banks by pretending to “help homeowners stay in their homes.” That’s gonna be a tough sell when it comes time to “help keep commercial real-estate owners in their commercial real estate.”

As such, this could be pretty hard on the banks cuz the gov will have a much harder time bailing them out, politically speaking.

Also gonna be tough for the owners to claim “predatory lending” when they are business people.

At this point, I hate to say I’d be surprised at anything the gov does, but, it seems a tougher challenge to bail out the banks on CRE.

[sdduuuude]

In the residential market, the gov. bailed out the banks by pretending to “help homeowners stay in their homes.” That’s gonna be a tough sell when it comes time to “help keep commercial real-estate owners in their commercial real estate.”

As such, this could be pretty hard on the banks cuz the gov will have a much harder time bailing them out, politically speaking.

Also gonna be tough for the owners to claim “predatory lending” when they are business people.

At this point, I hate to say I’d be surprised at anything the gov does, but, it seems a tougher challenge to bail out the banks on CRE.

[sdduuuude]

Pump It Up – fixed fee for first 25 kids. Nominal charge per kid over 25. Two parties w/ 12 kids each costs double 1 party with 24. We had 28 or so.

At home – you have to set up and tear down twice. Takes double the time.

Legoland – smaller twin effect. Same kid cost, but assuming we don’t let the kids run amok in Legoland without us, we would have to pay to get the parents in twice.

[sdduuuude]

Pump It Up – fixed fee for first 25 kids. Nominal charge per kid over 25. Two parties w/ 12 kids each costs double 1 party with 24. We had 28 or so.

At home – you have to set up and tear down twice. Takes double the time.

Legoland – smaller twin effect. Same kid cost, but assuming we don’t let the kids run amok in Legoland without us, we would have to pay to get the parents in twice.

[sdduuuude]

Pump It Up – fixed fee for first 25 kids. Nominal charge per kid over 25. Two parties w/ 12 kids each costs double 1 party with 24. We had 28 or so.

At home – you have to set up and tear down twice. Takes double the time.

Legoland – smaller twin effect. Same kid cost, but assuming we don’t let the kids run amok in Legoland without us, we would have to pay to get the parents in twice.

[sdduuuude]

Pump It Up – fixed fee for first 25 kids. Nominal charge per kid over 25. Two parties w/ 12 kids each costs double 1 party with 24. We had 28 or so.

At home – you have to set up and tear down twice. Takes double the time.

Legoland – smaller twin effect. Same kid cost, but assuming we don’t let the kids run amok in Legoland without us, we would have to pay to get the parents in twice.

[sdduuuude]

Pump It Up – fixed fee for first 25 kids. Nominal charge per kid over 25. Two parties w/ 12 kids each costs double 1 party with 24. We had 28 or so.

At home – you have to set up and tear down twice. Takes double the time.

Legoland – smaller twin effect. Same kid cost, but assuming we don’t let the kids run amok in Legoland without us, we would have to pay to get the parents in twice.

[sdduuuude]

Another thought – regarding Poway/Escondido or anything else to the east.

It’s too hot. You lose two of the main benefits of paying dearly to live in San Diego – weather and beach. Like 4plex said – if you live that far, you will rarely go. And, there’s the commute.

For the same price house, I’d rather live in Phoenix or Tucson than Poway/Escondido. Lower state taxes, lower cost of living, live closer to work.

[sdduuuude]

Another thought – regarding Poway/Escondido or anything else to the east.

It’s too hot. You lose two of the main benefits of paying dearly to live in San Diego – weather and beach. Like 4plex said – if you live that far, you will rarely go. And, there’s the commute.

For the same price house, I’d rather live in Phoenix or Tucson than Poway/Escondido. Lower state taxes, lower cost of living, live closer to work.

[sdduuuude]

Another thought – regarding Poway/Escondido or anything else to the east.

It’s too hot. You lose two of the main benefits of paying dearly to live in San Diego – weather and beach. Like 4plex said – if you live that far, you will rarely go. And, there’s the commute.

For the same price house, I’d rather live in Phoenix or Tucson than Poway/Escondido. Lower state taxes, lower cost of living, live closer to work.

[sdduuuude]

Another thought – regarding Poway/Escondido or anything else to the east.

It’s too hot. You lose two of the main benefits of paying dearly to live in San Diego – weather and beach. Like 4plex said – if you live that far, you will rarely go. And, there’s the commute.

For the same price house, I’d rather live in Phoenix or Tucson than Poway/Escondido. Lower state taxes, lower cost of living, live closer to work.

[sdduuuude]

Another thought – regarding Poway/Escondido or anything else to the east.

It’s too hot. You lose two of the main benefits of paying dearly to live in San Diego – weather and beach. Like 4plex said – if you live that far, you will rarely go. And, there’s the commute.

For the same price house, I’d rather live in Phoenix or Tucson than Poway/Escondido. Lower state taxes, lower cost of living, live closer to work.

[sdduuuude]

[quote=UCGal]But to do that every year – if you have multiple kids… that gets pretty pricey pretty darn quick.[/quote]

One word for you:

TWINS !

[Author]

Posts