Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sdduuuude
ParticipantAny $6 spent at Taco Bell.
ParticipantAny $6 spent at Taco Bell.
ParticipantAny $6 spent at Taco Bell.
Participant[quote=briansd1]sdduuuude, now comes the hard part. What programs do you propose to cut? [/quote]
How ’bout we start with anything that involves “increasing homeownership”, “keeping people in their homes” or “reducing foreclosures”
Participant[quote=briansd1]sdduuuude, now comes the hard part. What programs do you propose to cut? [/quote]
How ’bout we start with anything that involves “increasing homeownership”, “keeping people in their homes” or “reducing foreclosures”
Participant[quote=briansd1]sdduuuude, now comes the hard part. What programs do you propose to cut? [/quote]
How ’bout we start with anything that involves “increasing homeownership”, “keeping people in their homes” or “reducing foreclosures”
Participant[quote=briansd1]sdduuuude, now comes the hard part. What programs do you propose to cut? [/quote]
How ’bout we start with anything that involves “increasing homeownership”, “keeping people in their homes” or “reducing foreclosures”
Participant[quote=briansd1]sdduuuude, now comes the hard part. What programs do you propose to cut? [/quote]
How ’bout we start with anything that involves “increasing homeownership”, “keeping people in their homes” or “reducing foreclosures”
Participant[quote=briansd1]
sdduuuude, now comes the hard part. What programs do you propose to cut?[/quote]Lets vote on them ! That would be a ballot worth voting on. Hell. If we get down to 10% of GDP, I’d be happy to let congress decide. Just cut the money and see what stays.
[quote=briansd1]
The problem is that we already are at way, way more than 10% of GDP.[/quote]Certainly – that is the problem. The solution, then, seems easy. Get it under 10%.
Participant[quote=briansd1]
sdduuuude, now comes the hard part. What programs do you propose to cut?[/quote]Lets vote on them ! That would be a ballot worth voting on. Hell. If we get down to 10% of GDP, I’d be happy to let congress decide. Just cut the money and see what stays.
[quote=briansd1]
The problem is that we already are at way, way more than 10% of GDP.[/quote]Certainly – that is the problem. The solution, then, seems easy. Get it under 10%.
Participant[quote=briansd1]
sdduuuude, now comes the hard part. What programs do you propose to cut?[/quote]Lets vote on them ! That would be a ballot worth voting on. Hell. If we get down to 10% of GDP, I’d be happy to let congress decide. Just cut the money and see what stays.
[quote=briansd1]
The problem is that we already are at way, way more than 10% of GDP.[/quote]Certainly – that is the problem. The solution, then, seems easy. Get it under 10%.
Participant[quote=briansd1]
sdduuuude, now comes the hard part. What programs do you propose to cut?[/quote]Lets vote on them ! That would be a ballot worth voting on. Hell. If we get down to 10% of GDP, I’d be happy to let congress decide. Just cut the money and see what stays.
[quote=briansd1]
The problem is that we already are at way, way more than 10% of GDP.[/quote]Certainly – that is the problem. The solution, then, seems easy. Get it under 10%.
Participant[quote=briansd1]
sdduuuude, now comes the hard part. What programs do you propose to cut?[/quote]Lets vote on them ! That would be a ballot worth voting on. Hell. If we get down to 10% of GDP, I’d be happy to let congress decide. Just cut the money and see what stays.
[quote=briansd1]
The problem is that we already are at way, way more than 10% of GDP.[/quote]Certainly – that is the problem. The solution, then, seems easy. Get it under 10%.
April 23, 2010 at 12:51 PM in reply to: In hindsight, who is most to blame for the Financial Crisis? #542978ParticipantInteresting – Congress looking at the ratings agency system.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100423/ap_on_bi_ge/us_meltdown_investigation_credit_raters
Someone is quoted “It’s like one of the parties in court paying the judge’s salary.”
I don’t exactly see it like that. The problem isn’t the “who” it is the “what.” They are paid to provide a rating, not necessarily an accurate rating. Pay-by-accuracy would be nice. Granted, that would be more likely if it were paid for by the user of the info, and not the issuer of the security.
-
AuthorPosts
