Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sdduuuude
ParticipantDon’t forget, I had this bit of info, as well, so there is information relative to prior years, which weren’t exactly stellar years.
[quote=Meredith Whitney] Non-performs have ballooned so they’ve more than doubled since the beginning of 2009.[/quote]
ParticipantDon’t forget, I had this bit of info, as well, so there is information relative to prior years, which weren’t exactly stellar years.
[quote=Meredith Whitney] Non-performs have ballooned so they’ve more than doubled since the beginning of 2009.[/quote]
ParticipantDon’t forget, I had this bit of info, as well, so there is information relative to prior years, which weren’t exactly stellar years.
[quote=Meredith Whitney] Non-performs have ballooned so they’ve more than doubled since the beginning of 2009.[/quote]
ParticipantWasn’t so worried about Meredith. The datapoint seemed interesting.
I have to admit, I don’t know how many of the 1.5x turn to charge-offs, but after 120 days, I’d guess it is at least 25%. (If I’m wrong, I’m wrong. But I admit I don’t know) 120 days is a long time. So, to me it translates into roughly another year as bad as the last two or three, as such:
Amount of chargeoffs in last 4 years = C.
Avg. amt of chargeoffs in 1 year: C/4 = C1
Amount over 120 days: C * 1.5 = C1 * 4 * 1.5 = 6*C1.
% needed to be as bad as 1 avg year: 16.Like I said, I’d guess it is over 16%.
I have a feeling I’m about to learn something …
I think it was the 6x figure that jumped out at me. If it is 1.5 x 4, then that’s alot.
ParticipantWasn’t so worried about Meredith. The datapoint seemed interesting.
I have to admit, I don’t know how many of the 1.5x turn to charge-offs, but after 120 days, I’d guess it is at least 25%. (If I’m wrong, I’m wrong. But I admit I don’t know) 120 days is a long time. So, to me it translates into roughly another year as bad as the last two or three, as such:
Amount of chargeoffs in last 4 years = C.
Avg. amt of chargeoffs in 1 year: C/4 = C1
Amount over 120 days: C * 1.5 = C1 * 4 * 1.5 = 6*C1.
% needed to be as bad as 1 avg year: 16.Like I said, I’d guess it is over 16%.
I have a feeling I’m about to learn something …
I think it was the 6x figure that jumped out at me. If it is 1.5 x 4, then that’s alot.
ParticipantWasn’t so worried about Meredith. The datapoint seemed interesting.
I have to admit, I don’t know how many of the 1.5x turn to charge-offs, but after 120 days, I’d guess it is at least 25%. (If I’m wrong, I’m wrong. But I admit I don’t know) 120 days is a long time. So, to me it translates into roughly another year as bad as the last two or three, as such:
Amount of chargeoffs in last 4 years = C.
Avg. amt of chargeoffs in 1 year: C/4 = C1
Amount over 120 days: C * 1.5 = C1 * 4 * 1.5 = 6*C1.
% needed to be as bad as 1 avg year: 16.Like I said, I’d guess it is over 16%.
I have a feeling I’m about to learn something …
I think it was the 6x figure that jumped out at me. If it is 1.5 x 4, then that’s alot.
ParticipantWasn’t so worried about Meredith. The datapoint seemed interesting.
I have to admit, I don’t know how many of the 1.5x turn to charge-offs, but after 120 days, I’d guess it is at least 25%. (If I’m wrong, I’m wrong. But I admit I don’t know) 120 days is a long time. So, to me it translates into roughly another year as bad as the last two or three, as such:
Amount of chargeoffs in last 4 years = C.
Avg. amt of chargeoffs in 1 year: C/4 = C1
Amount over 120 days: C * 1.5 = C1 * 4 * 1.5 = 6*C1.
% needed to be as bad as 1 avg year: 16.Like I said, I’d guess it is over 16%.
I have a feeling I’m about to learn something …
I think it was the 6x figure that jumped out at me. If it is 1.5 x 4, then that’s alot.
ParticipantWasn’t so worried about Meredith. The datapoint seemed interesting.
I have to admit, I don’t know how many of the 1.5x turn to charge-offs, but after 120 days, I’d guess it is at least 25%. (If I’m wrong, I’m wrong. But I admit I don’t know) 120 days is a long time. So, to me it translates into roughly another year as bad as the last two or three, as such:
Amount of chargeoffs in last 4 years = C.
Avg. amt of chargeoffs in 1 year: C/4 = C1
Amount over 120 days: C * 1.5 = C1 * 4 * 1.5 = 6*C1.
% needed to be as bad as 1 avg year: 16.Like I said, I’d guess it is over 16%.
I have a feeling I’m about to learn something …
I think it was the 6x figure that jumped out at me. If it is 1.5 x 4, then that’s alot.
ParticipantKayaking at night during a bioluminescence event is really cool. The swirls in the water glow as you paddle. Very erie.
ParticipantKayaking at night during a bioluminescence event is really cool. The swirls in the water glow as you paddle. Very erie.
ParticipantKayaking at night during a bioluminescence event is really cool. The swirls in the water glow as you paddle. Very erie.
ParticipantKayaking at night during a bioluminescence event is really cool. The swirls in the water glow as you paddle. Very erie.
ParticipantKayaking at night during a bioluminescence event is really cool. The swirls in the water glow as you paddle. Very erie.
ParticipantI’d be surprised if you couldn’t do that in Autocad itself.
-
AuthorPosts
