[sdduuuude]

[quote=meadandale]Well, considering the demographics, if Los Angelinos stop traveling to Arizona that may make a huge dent in their problem anyways.[/quote]

Never thought of it that way! Those zonies are smarter than I thought! Likely more illegals will be heading our way or into New Mexico. Maybe the border patrol should set up on I-8 at the CA/AZ border and catch them coming to the state where illegals are not illegal. Huh ?

[sdduuuude]

[quote=meadandale]Well, considering the demographics, if Los Angelinos stop traveling to Arizona that may make a huge dent in their problem anyways.[/quote]

Never thought of it that way! Those zonies are smarter than I thought! Likely more illegals will be heading our way or into New Mexico. Maybe the border patrol should set up on I-8 at the CA/AZ border and catch them coming to the state where illegals are not illegal. Huh ?

[sdduuuude]

[quote=meadandale]Well, considering the demographics, if Los Angelinos stop traveling to Arizona that may make a huge dent in their problem anyways.[/quote]

Never thought of it that way! Those zonies are smarter than I thought! Likely more illegals will be heading our way or into New Mexico. Maybe the border patrol should set up on I-8 at the CA/AZ border and catch them coming to the state where illegals are not illegal. Huh ?

[sdduuuude]

[quote=meadandale]Well, considering the demographics, if Los Angelinos stop traveling to Arizona that may make a huge dent in their problem anyways.[/quote]

Never thought of it that way! Those zonies are smarter than I thought! Likely more illegals will be heading our way or into New Mexico. Maybe the border patrol should set up on I-8 at the CA/AZ border and catch them coming to the state where illegals are not illegal. Huh ?

[sdduuuude]

[quote=davelj]Clearly the most unethical are the folks who can’t pay because they were living well beyond their means.[/quote]

I’ll buy into the “sliding scale” of unethical behavior. It isn’t black and white. I suspect my scale is a little different than yours. I don’t think any walkers-away are very far down the unethical path.

I want to agree that those who stop making payments, then rent out the place are acting unethically, but I’m not sure I can – just because, again, the banks are stupid enough to let it happen.

I just don’t understand why the banks, after two years of this, have not staffed up to a point where they can foreclose more rapidly on these people. I bought the “not enough staff” line last year, but with a high unemployment rate, it seems the banks should come through with some bodies to hammer out these foreclosures. Maybe we need a new thread for that one, though.

[sdduuuude]

[quote=davelj]Clearly the most unethical are the folks who can’t pay because they were living well beyond their means.[/quote]

I’ll buy into the “sliding scale” of unethical behavior. It isn’t black and white. I suspect my scale is a little different than yours. I don’t think any walkers-away are very far down the unethical path.

I want to agree that those who stop making payments, then rent out the place are acting unethically, but I’m not sure I can – just because, again, the banks are stupid enough to let it happen.

I just don’t understand why the banks, after two years of this, have not staffed up to a point where they can foreclose more rapidly on these people. I bought the “not enough staff” line last year, but with a high unemployment rate, it seems the banks should come through with some bodies to hammer out these foreclosures. Maybe we need a new thread for that one, though.

[sdduuuude]

[quote=davelj]Clearly the most unethical are the folks who can’t pay because they were living well beyond their means.[/quote]

I’ll buy into the “sliding scale” of unethical behavior. It isn’t black and white. I suspect my scale is a little different than yours. I don’t think any walkers-away are very far down the unethical path.

I want to agree that those who stop making payments, then rent out the place are acting unethically, but I’m not sure I can – just because, again, the banks are stupid enough to let it happen.

I just don’t understand why the banks, after two years of this, have not staffed up to a point where they can foreclose more rapidly on these people. I bought the “not enough staff” line last year, but with a high unemployment rate, it seems the banks should come through with some bodies to hammer out these foreclosures. Maybe we need a new thread for that one, though.

[sdduuuude]

[quote=davelj]Clearly the most unethical are the folks who can’t pay because they were living well beyond their means.[/quote]

I’ll buy into the “sliding scale” of unethical behavior. It isn’t black and white. I suspect my scale is a little different than yours. I don’t think any walkers-away are very far down the unethical path.

I want to agree that those who stop making payments, then rent out the place are acting unethically, but I’m not sure I can – just because, again, the banks are stupid enough to let it happen.

I just don’t understand why the banks, after two years of this, have not staffed up to a point where they can foreclose more rapidly on these people. I bought the “not enough staff” line last year, but with a high unemployment rate, it seems the banks should come through with some bodies to hammer out these foreclosures. Maybe we need a new thread for that one, though.

[sdduuuude]

[quote=davelj]Clearly the most unethical are the folks who can’t pay because they were living well beyond their means.[/quote]

I’ll buy into the “sliding scale” of unethical behavior. It isn’t black and white. I suspect my scale is a little different than yours. I don’t think any walkers-away are very far down the unethical path.

I want to agree that those who stop making payments, then rent out the place are acting unethically, but I’m not sure I can – just because, again, the banks are stupid enough to let it happen.

I just don’t understand why the banks, after two years of this, have not staffed up to a point where they can foreclose more rapidly on these people. I bought the “not enough staff” line last year, but with a high unemployment rate, it seems the banks should come through with some bodies to hammer out these foreclosures. Maybe we need a new thread for that one, though.

[sdduuuude]

Got your PM. Thanks.

[sdduuuude]

Got your PM. Thanks.

[sdduuuude]

Got your PM. Thanks.

[sdduuuude]

Got your PM. Thanks.

[sdduuuude]

Got your PM. Thanks.

[sdduuuude]

[quote=davelj]But it’s pretty clear to me that moral standards have changed too.[/quote]

Did they ? Or did the situation change? i.e. are borrowers more up-side-down than ever before and the “morality” of paying off the loan in underwater conditions has not been tested to this extent before.

Or, perhaps the availability of ez credit drew in more people of a lower moral standard than ever before.

[Author]

Posts