Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #609781September 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610329
sdduuuude
ParticipantYes – we are playing “Let’s Make a Deal” and a goat waits behind each of the three doors. There is no “Brand New Car !”
September 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610440ParticipantYes – we are playing “Let’s Make a Deal” and a goat waits behind each of the three doors. There is no “Brand New Car !”
September 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610758ParticipantYes – we are playing “Let’s Make a Deal” and a goat waits behind each of the three doors. There is no “Brand New Car !”
September 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #609668ParticipantI agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.
September 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #609756ParticipantI agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.
September 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610306ParticipantI agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.
September 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610416ParticipantI agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.
September 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610733ParticipantI agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.
ParticipantClosing the polls at noon would ensure certain defeat of this bill.
ParticipantClosing the polls at noon would ensure certain defeat of this bill.
ParticipantClosing the polls at noon would ensure certain defeat of this bill.
ParticipantClosing the polls at noon would ensure certain defeat of this bill.
ParticipantClosing the polls at noon would ensure certain defeat of this bill.
Participantdavelj – you remind me ALOT of my brother.
-
AuthorPosts
