Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
robyns_song
ParticipantWhy work to pay for your home when you can sue someone instead?
ParticipantWhy work to pay for your home when you can sue someone instead?
ParticipantWhy work to pay for your home when you can sue someone instead?
ParticipantWhy work to pay for your home when you can sue someone instead?
ParticipantI always thought a buyer can back out of a reale state contract at any time before closing, but risks losing the earnest money deposit. If the home inspection finds something you didn’t expect, you can back out without losing your deposit. If you’re uncertain about the property, I’d definately back out.
ParticipantI always thought a buyer can back out of a reale state contract at any time before closing, but risks losing the earnest money deposit. If the home inspection finds something you didn’t expect, you can back out without losing your deposit. If you’re uncertain about the property, I’d definately back out.
ParticipantI always thought a buyer can back out of a reale state contract at any time before closing, but risks losing the earnest money deposit. If the home inspection finds something you didn’t expect, you can back out without losing your deposit. If you’re uncertain about the property, I’d definately back out.
ParticipantI always thought a buyer can back out of a reale state contract at any time before closing, but risks losing the earnest money deposit. If the home inspection finds something you didn’t expect, you can back out without losing your deposit. If you’re uncertain about the property, I’d definately back out.
ParticipantI always thought a buyer can back out of a reale state contract at any time before closing, but risks losing the earnest money deposit. If the home inspection finds something you didn’t expect, you can back out without losing your deposit. If you’re uncertain about the property, I’d definately back out.
ParticipantFMV=Fair Market Value. That’s the value that the property was appraised at (if the property was assessed at $691K when it was purchased at $500K, you pay the taxes on $691K). Sdr, correct me if I’m wrong.
On a different note, this will be interesting to see what happens to the city/state once they won’t be getting as much taxes due to decreased property values. We’re already facing budget cuts.
ParticipantFMV=Fair Market Value. That’s the value that the property was appraised at (if the property was assessed at $691K when it was purchased at $500K, you pay the taxes on $691K). Sdr, correct me if I’m wrong.
On a different note, this will be interesting to see what happens to the city/state once they won’t be getting as much taxes due to decreased property values. We’re already facing budget cuts.
ParticipantFMV=Fair Market Value. That’s the value that the property was appraised at (if the property was assessed at $691K when it was purchased at $500K, you pay the taxes on $691K). Sdr, correct me if I’m wrong.
On a different note, this will be interesting to see what happens to the city/state once they won’t be getting as much taxes due to decreased property values. We’re already facing budget cuts.
ParticipantFMV=Fair Market Value. That’s the value that the property was appraised at (if the property was assessed at $691K when it was purchased at $500K, you pay the taxes on $691K). Sdr, correct me if I’m wrong.
On a different note, this will be interesting to see what happens to the city/state once they won’t be getting as much taxes due to decreased property values. We’re already facing budget cuts.
ParticipantFMV=Fair Market Value. That’s the value that the property was appraised at (if the property was assessed at $691K when it was purchased at $500K, you pay the taxes on $691K). Sdr, correct me if I’m wrong.
On a different note, this will be interesting to see what happens to the city/state once they won’t be getting as much taxes due to decreased property values. We’re already facing budget cuts.
-
AuthorPosts
