[pepsi]

[quote=lajolla-pig]
………..

what year was it they began calling programers engineers? Who asked them to do that? Why? I’ve heard of janitors asking to be called sanitation engineers…they aren’t paid that well either. Not that I would equate the two…clearly programmers require more intelligence and education.
[/quote]

Being a programmer myself, it is hard not to defend the concept that progamming is some easy work and engineers are more important/smarter than programmers.

If that is true, then I guess there is no engineer at all in Microsoft and Googles. And the last 15 years of internet and www are not done by “engineers” either.
If you are not in IT/Engineer field, better not to comment on things you don’t know. If the concept is too new to you, maybe you should have watched some TV before you posted, Grandpa.

[pepsi]

[quote=lajolla-pig]
………..

what year was it they began calling programers engineers? Who asked them to do that? Why? I’ve heard of janitors asking to be called sanitation engineers…they aren’t paid that well either. Not that I would equate the two…clearly programmers require more intelligence and education.
[/quote]

Being a programmer myself, it is hard not to defend the concept that progamming is some easy work and engineers are more important/smarter than programmers.

If that is true, then I guess there is no engineer at all in Microsoft and Googles. And the last 15 years of internet and www are not done by “engineers” either.
If you are not in IT/Engineer field, better not to comment on things you don’t know. If the concept is too new to you, maybe you should have watched some TV before you posted, Grandpa.

[pepsi]

[quote=lajolla-pig]
………..

what year was it they began calling programers engineers? Who asked them to do that? Why? I’ve heard of janitors asking to be called sanitation engineers…they aren’t paid that well either. Not that I would equate the two…clearly programmers require more intelligence and education.
[/quote]

Being a programmer myself, it is hard not to defend the concept that progamming is some easy work and engineers are more important/smarter than programmers.

If that is true, then I guess there is no engineer at all in Microsoft and Googles. And the last 15 years of internet and www are not done by “engineers” either.
If you are not in IT/Engineer field, better not to comment on things you don’t know. If the concept is too new to you, maybe you should have watched some TV before you posted, Grandpa.

[pepsi]

[quote=lajolla-pig]
………..

what year was it they began calling programers engineers? Who asked them to do that? Why? I’ve heard of janitors asking to be called sanitation engineers…they aren’t paid that well either. Not that I would equate the two…clearly programmers require more intelligence and education.
[/quote]

Being a programmer myself, it is hard not to defend the concept that progamming is some easy work and engineers are more important/smarter than programmers.

If that is true, then I guess there is no engineer at all in Microsoft and Googles. And the last 15 years of internet and www are not done by “engineers” either.
If you are not in IT/Engineer field, better not to comment on things you don’t know. If the concept is too new to you, maybe you should have watched some TV before you posted, Grandpa.

[pepsi]

[quote=lajolla-pig]
………..

what year was it they began calling programers engineers? Who asked them to do that? Why? I’ve heard of janitors asking to be called sanitation engineers…they aren’t paid that well either. Not that I would equate the two…clearly programmers require more intelligence and education.
[/quote]

Being a programmer myself, it is hard not to defend the concept that progamming is some easy work and engineers are more important/smarter than programmers.

If that is true, then I guess there is no engineer at all in Microsoft and Googles. And the last 15 years of internet and www are not done by “engineers” either.
If you are not in IT/Engineer field, better not to comment on things you don’t know. If the concept is too new to you, maybe you should have watched some TV before you posted, Grandpa.

[pepsi]

Yes, I guess you need to count the six months. But it also depends on your capital gain.
You get 90% deduction (4.5/5).
If you are married, you have 450K
If you are single, you should have 225K

[pepsi]

Yes, I guess you need to count the six months. But it also depends on your capital gain.
You get 90% deduction (4.5/5).
If you are married, you have 450K
If you are single, you should have 225K

[pepsi]

Yes, I guess you need to count the six months. But it also depends on your capital gain.
You get 90% deduction (4.5/5).
If you are married, you have 450K
If you are single, you should have 225K

[pepsi]

Yes, I guess you need to count the six months. But it also depends on your capital gain.
You get 90% deduction (4.5/5).
If you are married, you have 450K
If you are single, you should have 225K

[pepsi]

Yes, I guess you need to count the six months. But it also depends on your capital gain.
You get 90% deduction (4.5/5).
If you are married, you have 450K
If you are single, you should have 225K

[pepsi]

[quote=ucodegen]
These ignore carrying costs. I suspect they are using their own cash w/o using bank funding. This allows them to at least earn the ‘interest’ that would have been paid to the lender. …..
[/quote]
15M for 1500 houses, so they are doing 100K down for each house.
After a 50% price reduction of a 600K house, the price should be around 300K.
So, that is 33% down payment.

[pepsi]

[quote=ucodegen]
These ignore carrying costs. I suspect they are using their own cash w/o using bank funding. This allows them to at least earn the ‘interest’ that would have been paid to the lender. …..
[/quote]
15M for 1500 houses, so they are doing 100K down for each house.
After a 50% price reduction of a 600K house, the price should be around 300K.
So, that is 33% down payment.

[pepsi]

[quote=ucodegen]
These ignore carrying costs. I suspect they are using their own cash w/o using bank funding. This allows them to at least earn the ‘interest’ that would have been paid to the lender. …..
[/quote]
15M for 1500 houses, so they are doing 100K down for each house.
After a 50% price reduction of a 600K house, the price should be around 300K.
So, that is 33% down payment.

[pepsi]

[quote=ucodegen]
These ignore carrying costs. I suspect they are using their own cash w/o using bank funding. This allows them to at least earn the ‘interest’ that would have been paid to the lender. …..
[/quote]
15M for 1500 houses, so they are doing 100K down for each house.
After a 50% price reduction of a 600K house, the price should be around 300K.
So, that is 33% down payment.

[pepsi]

[quote=ucodegen]
These ignore carrying costs. I suspect they are using their own cash w/o using bank funding. This allows them to at least earn the ‘interest’ that would have been paid to the lender. …..
[/quote]
15M for 1500 houses, so they are doing 100K down for each house.
After a 50% price reduction of a 600K house, the price should be around 300K.
So, that is 33% down payment.

[Author]

Posts