Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 11, 2008 at 4:28 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237790July 11, 2008 at 4:28 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237924
Peace
ParticipantOK Allen you idiot…
DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT KERRY WOULD HAVE SAID THIS?
“those who served in Vietnam “baby killers” grotesque.”
ok I am going to give my age away here… I lived in Saigon from 1966 – 1972 (age 14-20) as the dependent of a retired Marine Major Pilot (who served in Vietnam 1964) turned Air America pilot so I do speak with a little experience (unique experience yes, but experience nonetheless)
I don’t care what the sentiments are of any Vietnam Vet – I will never believe that Kerry or any Vet ever said anything like that.
Show me a reference or any legitimate proof Kerry ever said that
People who repeat things like that make me sick – that includes you.
July 11, 2008 at 4:28 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237931ParticipantOK Allen you idiot…
DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT KERRY WOULD HAVE SAID THIS?
“those who served in Vietnam “baby killers” grotesque.”
ok I am going to give my age away here… I lived in Saigon from 1966 – 1972 (age 14-20) as the dependent of a retired Marine Major Pilot (who served in Vietnam 1964) turned Air America pilot so I do speak with a little experience (unique experience yes, but experience nonetheless)
I don’t care what the sentiments are of any Vietnam Vet – I will never believe that Kerry or any Vet ever said anything like that.
Show me a reference or any legitimate proof Kerry ever said that
People who repeat things like that make me sick – that includes you.
July 11, 2008 at 4:28 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237980ParticipantOK Allen you idiot…
DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT KERRY WOULD HAVE SAID THIS?
“those who served in Vietnam “baby killers” grotesque.”
ok I am going to give my age away here… I lived in Saigon from 1966 – 1972 (age 14-20) as the dependent of a retired Marine Major Pilot (who served in Vietnam 1964) turned Air America pilot so I do speak with a little experience (unique experience yes, but experience nonetheless)
I don’t care what the sentiments are of any Vietnam Vet – I will never believe that Kerry or any Vet ever said anything like that.
Show me a reference or any legitimate proof Kerry ever said that
People who repeat things like that make me sick – that includes you.
July 11, 2008 at 4:28 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237991ParticipantOK Allen you idiot…
DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT KERRY WOULD HAVE SAID THIS?
“those who served in Vietnam “baby killers” grotesque.”
ok I am going to give my age away here… I lived in Saigon from 1966 – 1972 (age 14-20) as the dependent of a retired Marine Major Pilot (who served in Vietnam 1964) turned Air America pilot so I do speak with a little experience (unique experience yes, but experience nonetheless)
I don’t care what the sentiments are of any Vietnam Vet – I will never believe that Kerry or any Vet ever said anything like that.
Show me a reference or any legitimate proof Kerry ever said that
People who repeat things like that make me sick – that includes you.
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237775ParticipantAllan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237909ParticipantAllan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237916ParticipantAllan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237965ParticipantAllan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
July 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237976ParticipantAllan said: ” You don’t think 9/11 could possibly have happened with Clinton in the White House? Really?”
Yes, absolutely.
My favorite passtime is listening to the congressional hearings on C-Span – I remember (9/11 commission) that EVERYONE who worked and knew Clinton said he kept his finger on the pulse of terrorism – did more work/briefings before breakfast in one morning than Bush does in a week. Considering that the first World Trade Center bombing occured just a month after his inauguration in 1993.
There was plenty of warning that OBL was planning an attack inside the US and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to figure out how it might and did play out. Just one memo should have been enough to put the country on high alert; like this one maybe? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0409041pdb1.html
Would you agree that it is one thing to protect our mainland against terrorist attacks vs worldwide attacks? Being attacked world wide will always be a risk and would not necessairly hold a president accountable for incidents where we really can not cover our exposure.
July 11, 2008 at 11:32 AM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237500ParticipantOK – I’m not too happy with how Clinton handled that either and I do believe that he came into office on a high tide but the whole impeachment was a fiasco.
Now that we have life-and-death issues there is no movement to impeach.
To quote freewayblogger again “Clinton lied – nobody died”
Clinton was/is a naughty boy but 9/11 would have never happenen on his watch.
Actually there has problably been more “naughty boys” in the White House than not. How far would Kennedy gone to deny his naughty behavior?
Maybe what GWB needs someone to step up to the plate and give him a good blow job. Now who could we get to volunteer?
July 11, 2008 at 11:32 AM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237633ParticipantOK – I’m not too happy with how Clinton handled that either and I do believe that he came into office on a high tide but the whole impeachment was a fiasco.
Now that we have life-and-death issues there is no movement to impeach.
To quote freewayblogger again “Clinton lied – nobody died”
Clinton was/is a naughty boy but 9/11 would have never happenen on his watch.
Actually there has problably been more “naughty boys” in the White House than not. How far would Kennedy gone to deny his naughty behavior?
Maybe what GWB needs someone to step up to the plate and give him a good blow job. Now who could we get to volunteer?
July 11, 2008 at 11:32 AM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237641ParticipantOK – I’m not too happy with how Clinton handled that either and I do believe that he came into office on a high tide but the whole impeachment was a fiasco.
Now that we have life-and-death issues there is no movement to impeach.
To quote freewayblogger again “Clinton lied – nobody died”
Clinton was/is a naughty boy but 9/11 would have never happenen on his watch.
Actually there has problably been more “naughty boys” in the White House than not. How far would Kennedy gone to deny his naughty behavior?
Maybe what GWB needs someone to step up to the plate and give him a good blow job. Now who could we get to volunteer?
July 11, 2008 at 11:32 AM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237689ParticipantOK – I’m not too happy with how Clinton handled that either and I do believe that he came into office on a high tide but the whole impeachment was a fiasco.
Now that we have life-and-death issues there is no movement to impeach.
To quote freewayblogger again “Clinton lied – nobody died”
Clinton was/is a naughty boy but 9/11 would have never happenen on his watch.
Actually there has problably been more “naughty boys” in the White House than not. How far would Kennedy gone to deny his naughty behavior?
Maybe what GWB needs someone to step up to the plate and give him a good blow job. Now who could we get to volunteer?
July 11, 2008 at 11:32 AM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #237703ParticipantOK – I’m not too happy with how Clinton handled that either and I do believe that he came into office on a high tide but the whole impeachment was a fiasco.
Now that we have life-and-death issues there is no movement to impeach.
To quote freewayblogger again “Clinton lied – nobody died”
Clinton was/is a naughty boy but 9/11 would have never happenen on his watch.
Actually there has problably been more “naughty boys” in the White House than not. How far would Kennedy gone to deny his naughty behavior?
Maybe what GWB needs someone to step up to the plate and give him a good blow job. Now who could we get to volunteer?
-
AuthorPosts