Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
patientrenter
Participant[quote=Russell]None of us would have any friends or be capable of belonging to any group, without the proper amount of social dishonesty, displayed many different ways.[/quote]
Yes, some pleasant dishonesty is necessary face to face, to oil the social interaction. But we can be honest to ourselves, and to some extent in forums like this where we don’t meet each other personally.
Participant[quote=Russell]None of us would have any friends or be capable of belonging to any group, without the proper amount of social dishonesty, displayed many different ways.[/quote]
Yes, some pleasant dishonesty is necessary face to face, to oil the social interaction. But we can be honest to ourselves, and to some extent in forums like this where we don’t meet each other personally.
Participant[quote=Russell]None of us would have any friends or be capable of belonging to any group, without the proper amount of social dishonesty, displayed many different ways.[/quote]
Yes, some pleasant dishonesty is necessary face to face, to oil the social interaction. But we can be honest to ourselves, and to some extent in forums like this where we don’t meet each other personally.
December 4, 2009 at 4:52 PM in reply to: Will the next “bad event” happen in the gov sector ? #490191ParticipantYou guys (saying that state govt will fall apart) are smoking something. The Feds will step in to save the worst states from their worst mistakes. It’s not even a contingency: It will happen.
December 4, 2009 at 4:52 PM in reply to: Will the next “bad event” happen in the gov sector ? #490357ParticipantYou guys (saying that state govt will fall apart) are smoking something. The Feds will step in to save the worst states from their worst mistakes. It’s not even a contingency: It will happen.
December 4, 2009 at 4:52 PM in reply to: Will the next “bad event” happen in the gov sector ? #490740ParticipantYou guys (saying that state govt will fall apart) are smoking something. The Feds will step in to save the worst states from their worst mistakes. It’s not even a contingency: It will happen.
December 4, 2009 at 4:52 PM in reply to: Will the next “bad event” happen in the gov sector ? #490828ParticipantYou guys (saying that state govt will fall apart) are smoking something. The Feds will step in to save the worst states from their worst mistakes. It’s not even a contingency: It will happen.
December 4, 2009 at 4:52 PM in reply to: Will the next “bad event” happen in the gov sector ? #491060ParticipantYou guys (saying that state govt will fall apart) are smoking something. The Feds will step in to save the worst states from their worst mistakes. It’s not even a contingency: It will happen.
Participantdavelj, you fought the good fight here. I agree with just about everything you said. Some of your interlocutors responded to what you didn’t say, but that’s in the nature of argumentation. The truth is that a lot of the basic trades in a typical man-woman relationship are not spoken honestly in polite company. Social conventions.
Participantdavelj, you fought the good fight here. I agree with just about everything you said. Some of your interlocutors responded to what you didn’t say, but that’s in the nature of argumentation. The truth is that a lot of the basic trades in a typical man-woman relationship are not spoken honestly in polite company. Social conventions.
Participantdavelj, you fought the good fight here. I agree with just about everything you said. Some of your interlocutors responded to what you didn’t say, but that’s in the nature of argumentation. The truth is that a lot of the basic trades in a typical man-woman relationship are not spoken honestly in polite company. Social conventions.
Participantdavelj, you fought the good fight here. I agree with just about everything you said. Some of your interlocutors responded to what you didn’t say, but that’s in the nature of argumentation. The truth is that a lot of the basic trades in a typical man-woman relationship are not spoken honestly in polite company. Social conventions.
Participantdavelj, you fought the good fight here. I agree with just about everything you said. Some of your interlocutors responded to what you didn’t say, but that’s in the nature of argumentation. The truth is that a lot of the basic trades in a typical man-woman relationship are not spoken honestly in polite company. Social conventions.
Participant[quote=HLS]In a society where the govt encourages spending if it took 20% down and 30% debt ratios to qualify for a mortgage, you would see home prices much, much lower, but that just wouldn’t be good for an artificial, phony economy. Don’t expect to see it anytime soon.[/quote]
Too true. The problem is so obvious, yet the PTB refuse to stop. Your solution would remove the punch completely and get everyone to face reality sober, but they just crank up the music and add some new flavors of intoxication to keep the party going, way after it stopped making any sense or being any fun.
This slight pullback in the FHA spigot is only being considered. If it would lead to any appreciable reduction in crazy loans, it will be repealed. The goal is to keep home prices high, no matter what.
-
AuthorPosts
