Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 11, 2010 at 7:23 PM in reply to: California Receives $700 Million in Federal Housing Aid #524916March 11, 2010 at 7:23 PM in reply to: California Receives $700 Million in Federal Housing Aid #525359
patientrenter
Participant[quote=justsayin1964]…..how do you know that some of the people caught up in all this mess weren’t prudent? I know people who put thier savings into a home thinking that they would be priced out of the market….[/quote]
Promising to pay more money for a place to live than you can afford to pay is not responsible. Period.
March 11, 2010 at 7:23 PM in reply to: California Receives $700 Million in Federal Housing Aid #525456patientrenter
Participant[quote=justsayin1964]…..how do you know that some of the people caught up in all this mess weren’t prudent? I know people who put thier savings into a home thinking that they would be priced out of the market….[/quote]
Promising to pay more money for a place to live than you can afford to pay is not responsible. Period.
March 11, 2010 at 7:23 PM in reply to: California Receives $700 Million in Federal Housing Aid #525713patientrenter
Participant[quote=justsayin1964]…..how do you know that some of the people caught up in all this mess weren’t prudent? I know people who put thier savings into a home thinking that they would be priced out of the market….[/quote]
Promising to pay more money for a place to live than you can afford to pay is not responsible. Period.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=desmond]…everybody who bought in the last 2 or so years is 20-30% on the upside.[/quote]
Only because of govt money (i.e. money that will be taken from savers and future taxpayers) propping up home prices in CA. There’s nothing natural about it. If the govt decided to pay $1000 a ton for horse manure, then that’s what it would be ‘worth’.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=desmond]…everybody who bought in the last 2 or so years is 20-30% on the upside.[/quote]
Only because of govt money (i.e. money that will be taken from savers and future taxpayers) propping up home prices in CA. There’s nothing natural about it. If the govt decided to pay $1000 a ton for horse manure, then that’s what it would be ‘worth’.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=desmond]…everybody who bought in the last 2 or so years is 20-30% on the upside.[/quote]
Only because of govt money (i.e. money that will be taken from savers and future taxpayers) propping up home prices in CA. There’s nothing natural about it. If the govt decided to pay $1000 a ton for horse manure, then that’s what it would be ‘worth’.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=desmond]…everybody who bought in the last 2 or so years is 20-30% on the upside.[/quote]
Only because of govt money (i.e. money that will be taken from savers and future taxpayers) propping up home prices in CA. There’s nothing natural about it. If the govt decided to pay $1000 a ton for horse manure, then that’s what it would be ‘worth’.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=desmond]…everybody who bought in the last 2 or so years is 20-30% on the upside.[/quote]
Only because of govt money (i.e. money that will be taken from savers and future taxpayers) propping up home prices in CA. There’s nothing natural about it. If the govt decided to pay $1000 a ton for horse manure, then that’s what it would be ‘worth’.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=ocrenter]….if they come over with “unstable symptoms,” hospitals can not legally turn them away. and since the only way to “stabilize” is the bypass surgery or multiple stents, the surgery or procedure are done essentially free of charge.[/quote]
Excellent system. Let’s keep it.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=ocrenter]….if they come over with “unstable symptoms,” hospitals can not legally turn them away. and since the only way to “stabilize” is the bypass surgery or multiple stents, the surgery or procedure are done essentially free of charge.[/quote]
Excellent system. Let’s keep it.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=ocrenter]….if they come over with “unstable symptoms,” hospitals can not legally turn them away. and since the only way to “stabilize” is the bypass surgery or multiple stents, the surgery or procedure are done essentially free of charge.[/quote]
Excellent system. Let’s keep it.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=ocrenter]….if they come over with “unstable symptoms,” hospitals can not legally turn them away. and since the only way to “stabilize” is the bypass surgery or multiple stents, the surgery or procedure are done essentially free of charge.[/quote]
Excellent system. Let’s keep it.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=ocrenter]….if they come over with “unstable symptoms,” hospitals can not legally turn them away. and since the only way to “stabilize” is the bypass surgery or multiple stents, the surgery or procedure are done essentially free of charge.[/quote]
Excellent system. Let’s keep it.
patientrenter
Participant[quote=briansd1]……I believe the government needs to get rid of waste and reallocate existing revenue to what makes us more productive — health care, education and training….[/quote]
We already spend way too much on health care. We spend about twice as much as most other developed economies with longer life expectancies than us. What we need most out of health care is dramatically lower spending, not more.
-
AuthorPosts
