Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 17, 2009 at 4:23 PM in reply to: “Renegotiate” Your Loan – banks giving in to buyers in distress #368517March 17, 2009 at 4:23 PM in reply to: “Renegotiate” Your Loan – banks giving in to buyers in distress #368685
patientrenter
ParticipantAgreed, pri_dk. People who spend big without earning big will eventually die, but that doesn’t change the fact that before then, they will have unfairly enjoyed the fruits of others’ labor.
March 17, 2009 at 4:23 PM in reply to: “Renegotiate” Your Loan – banks giving in to buyers in distress #368723ParticipantAgreed, pri_dk. People who spend big without earning big will eventually die, but that doesn’t change the fact that before then, they will have unfairly enjoyed the fruits of others’ labor.
March 17, 2009 at 4:23 PM in reply to: “Renegotiate” Your Loan – banks giving in to buyers in distress #368838ParticipantAgreed, pri_dk. People who spend big without earning big will eventually die, but that doesn’t change the fact that before then, they will have unfairly enjoyed the fruits of others’ labor.
Participant[quote=CONCHO]Thanks, CONCHO. I’d actually picked out the number 500 million myself, but it’s nice to see there are others who agree that it’s not a bad target. Way too many people here.
Okay so why haven’t you hurled yourself off of a bridge yet? Oh wait, I see, what you actually meant to say was that there are too many of “those other people” here.[/quote]
Thank you. Yes, it was definitely other people I’d hoped wouldn’t be here. If you’re in a rush, go for the neutron bomb approach, but I’m OK with taking a few generations of fewer births.
Participant[quote=CONCHO]Thanks, CONCHO. I’d actually picked out the number 500 million myself, but it’s nice to see there are others who agree that it’s not a bad target. Way too many people here.
Okay so why haven’t you hurled yourself off of a bridge yet? Oh wait, I see, what you actually meant to say was that there are too many of “those other people” here.[/quote]
Thank you. Yes, it was definitely other people I’d hoped wouldn’t be here. If you’re in a rush, go for the neutron bomb approach, but I’m OK with taking a few generations of fewer births.
Participant[quote=CONCHO]Thanks, CONCHO. I’d actually picked out the number 500 million myself, but it’s nice to see there are others who agree that it’s not a bad target. Way too many people here.
Okay so why haven’t you hurled yourself off of a bridge yet? Oh wait, I see, what you actually meant to say was that there are too many of “those other people” here.[/quote]
Thank you. Yes, it was definitely other people I’d hoped wouldn’t be here. If you’re in a rush, go for the neutron bomb approach, but I’m OK with taking a few generations of fewer births.
Participant[quote=CONCHO]Thanks, CONCHO. I’d actually picked out the number 500 million myself, but it’s nice to see there are others who agree that it’s not a bad target. Way too many people here.
Okay so why haven’t you hurled yourself off of a bridge yet? Oh wait, I see, what you actually meant to say was that there are too many of “those other people” here.[/quote]
Thank you. Yes, it was definitely other people I’d hoped wouldn’t be here. If you’re in a rush, go for the neutron bomb approach, but I’m OK with taking a few generations of fewer births.
Participant[quote=CONCHO]Thanks, CONCHO. I’d actually picked out the number 500 million myself, but it’s nice to see there are others who agree that it’s not a bad target. Way too many people here.
Okay so why haven’t you hurled yourself off of a bridge yet? Oh wait, I see, what you actually meant to say was that there are too many of “those other people” here.[/quote]
Thank you. Yes, it was definitely other people I’d hoped wouldn’t be here. If you’re in a rush, go for the neutron bomb approach, but I’m OK with taking a few generations of fewer births.
ParticipantWith such lousy protections for lenders, why would any sane person or institution ever lend more than 50-60% of the price of a home?
ParticipantWith such lousy protections for lenders, why would any sane person or institution ever lend more than 50-60% of the price of a home?
ParticipantWith such lousy protections for lenders, why would any sane person or institution ever lend more than 50-60% of the price of a home?
ParticipantWith such lousy protections for lenders, why would any sane person or institution ever lend more than 50-60% of the price of a home?
ParticipantWith such lousy protections for lenders, why would any sane person or institution ever lend more than 50-60% of the price of a home?
Participant[quote=flu][quote=patientrenter]Is this legal?[/quote]
yup.[/quote]
flu, or any pigg lawyers out there, surely it is not legal to trash property, especially for self-enrichment, when the property is collateral for a loan and the property owner has, and knows they have, no equity.
Can this really be legal?
-
AuthorPosts
