Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
patientlywaiting
ParticipantBlonde divorces her rich old husband on youtube:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/webscout/2008/04/the-advent-of-y.html
ParticipantBlonde divorces her rich old husband on youtube:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/webscout/2008/04/the-advent-of-y.html
ParticipantBlonde divorces her rich old husband on youtube:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/webscout/2008/04/the-advent-of-y.html
ParticipantBlonde divorces her rich old husband on youtube:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/webscout/2008/04/the-advent-of-y.html
ParticipantSorry to say it, but the bank is doing the right thing. That’s what PMI is for — to safeguard the collateral based on loan to value ratio.
PMI has nothing to do with how long you’ve made payments on time.
ParticipantSorry to say it, but the bank is doing the right thing. That’s what PMI is for — to safeguard the collateral based on loan to value ratio.
PMI has nothing to do with how long you’ve made payments on time.
ParticipantSorry to say it, but the bank is doing the right thing. That’s what PMI is for — to safeguard the collateral based on loan to value ratio.
PMI has nothing to do with how long you’ve made payments on time.
ParticipantSorry to say it, but the bank is doing the right thing. That’s what PMI is for — to safeguard the collateral based on loan to value ratio.
PMI has nothing to do with how long you’ve made payments on time.
ParticipantSorry to say it, but the bank is doing the right thing. That’s what PMI is for — to safeguard the collateral based on loan to value ratio.
PMI has nothing to do with how long you’ve made payments on time.
ParticipantTemeculaguy is absolutely right, it’s not criminal to remove fixtures from your own property while you still own it.
If he wanted to push to legal envelope, the owner could dismantle the house and cart it away without repercussions. I’ve heard of some people doing just that.
In related matters, the trustee sale is what it is. It’s a private party transaction on behalf of the beneficiary.
Even if the loan is a recourse loan, the bank has do a court/legal foreclosure to get a deficiency judgment. The trustee can’t give the bank a deficiency judgment only a judge can. So for all practical purposes, nearly all mortgages in California are non-recourse (purchase money or not).
ParticipantTemeculaguy is absolutely right, it’s not criminal to remove fixtures from your own property while you still own it.
If he wanted to push to legal envelope, the owner could dismantle the house and cart it away without repercussions. I’ve heard of some people doing just that.
In related matters, the trustee sale is what it is. It’s a private party transaction on behalf of the beneficiary.
Even if the loan is a recourse loan, the bank has do a court/legal foreclosure to get a deficiency judgment. The trustee can’t give the bank a deficiency judgment only a judge can. So for all practical purposes, nearly all mortgages in California are non-recourse (purchase money or not).
ParticipantTemeculaguy is absolutely right, it’s not criminal to remove fixtures from your own property while you still own it.
If he wanted to push to legal envelope, the owner could dismantle the house and cart it away without repercussions. I’ve heard of some people doing just that.
In related matters, the trustee sale is what it is. It’s a private party transaction on behalf of the beneficiary.
Even if the loan is a recourse loan, the bank has do a court/legal foreclosure to get a deficiency judgment. The trustee can’t give the bank a deficiency judgment only a judge can. So for all practical purposes, nearly all mortgages in California are non-recourse (purchase money or not).
ParticipantTemeculaguy is absolutely right, it’s not criminal to remove fixtures from your own property while you still own it.
If he wanted to push to legal envelope, the owner could dismantle the house and cart it away without repercussions. I’ve heard of some people doing just that.
In related matters, the trustee sale is what it is. It’s a private party transaction on behalf of the beneficiary.
Even if the loan is a recourse loan, the bank has do a court/legal foreclosure to get a deficiency judgment. The trustee can’t give the bank a deficiency judgment only a judge can. So for all practical purposes, nearly all mortgages in California are non-recourse (purchase money or not).
ParticipantTemeculaguy is absolutely right, it’s not criminal to remove fixtures from your own property while you still own it.
If he wanted to push to legal envelope, the owner could dismantle the house and cart it away without repercussions. I’ve heard of some people doing just that.
In related matters, the trustee sale is what it is. It’s a private party transaction on behalf of the beneficiary.
Even if the loan is a recourse loan, the bank has do a court/legal foreclosure to get a deficiency judgment. The trustee can’t give the bank a deficiency judgment only a judge can. So for all practical purposes, nearly all mortgages in California are non-recourse (purchase money or not).
-
AuthorPosts
