Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
patientlywaiting
ParticipantIt will be interesting to watch.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/12/news/companies/paulson_lehman.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008091212
WASHINGTON (AP) — Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is against any use of government money to bail out Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., a person familiar with his thinking said Friday.ParticipantIt will be interesting to watch.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/12/news/companies/paulson_lehman.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008091212
WASHINGTON (AP) — Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is against any use of government money to bail out Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., a person familiar with his thinking said Friday.ParticipantIt will be interesting to watch.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/12/news/companies/paulson_lehman.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008091212
WASHINGTON (AP) — Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is against any use of government money to bail out Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., a person familiar with his thinking said Friday.ParticipantIt will be interesting to watch.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/12/news/companies/paulson_lehman.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008091212
WASHINGTON (AP) — Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is against any use of government money to bail out Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., a person familiar with his thinking said Friday.Participant[quote=stockstradr]
Even Brzezinski himself has revealed in published interviews the previously well-kept secret that our tax dollars had sent massive arms and covert CIA operations into Afghanistan BEFORE any Soviet involvement, because it was in part a TRAP for the Soviets to walk into.[/quote]Very true. I heard him say so in interviews.
http://www.charlierose.com/search?q=Brzezinski&searchTopic=-1&searchFromMonth=MM&searchFromDay=DD&searchFromYear=YY&searchToMonth=MM&searchToDay=DD&searchToYear=YY&searchFilter=Brzezinski&searchType=guestAlso, Ronald Reagan had nothing to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet empire collapsed because oil prices collapsed.
Look at how the rise in oil prices is funding a resurgent Russia.
Participant[quote=stockstradr]
Even Brzezinski himself has revealed in published interviews the previously well-kept secret that our tax dollars had sent massive arms and covert CIA operations into Afghanistan BEFORE any Soviet involvement, because it was in part a TRAP for the Soviets to walk into.[/quote]Very true. I heard him say so in interviews.
http://www.charlierose.com/search?q=Brzezinski&searchTopic=-1&searchFromMonth=MM&searchFromDay=DD&searchFromYear=YY&searchToMonth=MM&searchToDay=DD&searchToYear=YY&searchFilter=Brzezinski&searchType=guestAlso, Ronald Reagan had nothing to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet empire collapsed because oil prices collapsed.
Look at how the rise in oil prices is funding a resurgent Russia.
Participant[quote=stockstradr]
Even Brzezinski himself has revealed in published interviews the previously well-kept secret that our tax dollars had sent massive arms and covert CIA operations into Afghanistan BEFORE any Soviet involvement, because it was in part a TRAP for the Soviets to walk into.[/quote]Very true. I heard him say so in interviews.
http://www.charlierose.com/search?q=Brzezinski&searchTopic=-1&searchFromMonth=MM&searchFromDay=DD&searchFromYear=YY&searchToMonth=MM&searchToDay=DD&searchToYear=YY&searchFilter=Brzezinski&searchType=guestAlso, Ronald Reagan had nothing to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet empire collapsed because oil prices collapsed.
Look at how the rise in oil prices is funding a resurgent Russia.
Participant[quote=stockstradr]
Even Brzezinski himself has revealed in published interviews the previously well-kept secret that our tax dollars had sent massive arms and covert CIA operations into Afghanistan BEFORE any Soviet involvement, because it was in part a TRAP for the Soviets to walk into.[/quote]Very true. I heard him say so in interviews.
http://www.charlierose.com/search?q=Brzezinski&searchTopic=-1&searchFromMonth=MM&searchFromDay=DD&searchFromYear=YY&searchToMonth=MM&searchToDay=DD&searchToYear=YY&searchFilter=Brzezinski&searchType=guestAlso, Ronald Reagan had nothing to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet empire collapsed because oil prices collapsed.
Look at how the rise in oil prices is funding a resurgent Russia.
Participant[quote=stockstradr]
Even Brzezinski himself has revealed in published interviews the previously well-kept secret that our tax dollars had sent massive arms and covert CIA operations into Afghanistan BEFORE any Soviet involvement, because it was in part a TRAP for the Soviets to walk into.[/quote]Very true. I heard him say so in interviews.
http://www.charlierose.com/search?q=Brzezinski&searchTopic=-1&searchFromMonth=MM&searchFromDay=DD&searchFromYear=YY&searchToMonth=MM&searchToDay=DD&searchToYear=YY&searchFilter=Brzezinski&searchType=guestAlso, Ronald Reagan had nothing to do with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet empire collapsed because oil prices collapsed.
Look at how the rise in oil prices is funding a resurgent Russia.
Participantwe’ve become “The United States of Fighting Terrorism.” Times columnists are not allowed to endorse candidates, but there’s no rule against saying who will not get my vote: I will not vote for any candidate running on 9/11. We don’t need another president of 9/11. We need a president for 9/12. I will only vote for the 9/12 candidate.
What does that mean? This: 9/11 has made us stupid. I honor, and weep for, all those murdered on that day. But our reaction to 9/11 — mine included — has knocked America completely out of balance, and it is time to get things right again.
Participantwe’ve become “The United States of Fighting Terrorism.” Times columnists are not allowed to endorse candidates, but there’s no rule against saying who will not get my vote: I will not vote for any candidate running on 9/11. We don’t need another president of 9/11. We need a president for 9/12. I will only vote for the 9/12 candidate.
What does that mean? This: 9/11 has made us stupid. I honor, and weep for, all those murdered on that day. But our reaction to 9/11 — mine included — has knocked America completely out of balance, and it is time to get things right again.
Participantwe’ve become “The United States of Fighting Terrorism.” Times columnists are not allowed to endorse candidates, but there’s no rule against saying who will not get my vote: I will not vote for any candidate running on 9/11. We don’t need another president of 9/11. We need a president for 9/12. I will only vote for the 9/12 candidate.
What does that mean? This: 9/11 has made us stupid. I honor, and weep for, all those murdered on that day. But our reaction to 9/11 — mine included — has knocked America completely out of balance, and it is time to get things right again.
Participantwe’ve become “The United States of Fighting Terrorism.” Times columnists are not allowed to endorse candidates, but there’s no rule against saying who will not get my vote: I will not vote for any candidate running on 9/11. We don’t need another president of 9/11. We need a president for 9/12. I will only vote for the 9/12 candidate.
What does that mean? This: 9/11 has made us stupid. I honor, and weep for, all those murdered on that day. But our reaction to 9/11 — mine included — has knocked America completely out of balance, and it is time to get things right again.
Participantwe’ve become “The United States of Fighting Terrorism.” Times columnists are not allowed to endorse candidates, but there’s no rule against saying who will not get my vote: I will not vote for any candidate running on 9/11. We don’t need another president of 9/11. We need a president for 9/12. I will only vote for the 9/12 candidate.
What does that mean? This: 9/11 has made us stupid. I honor, and weep for, all those murdered on that day. But our reaction to 9/11 — mine included — has knocked America completely out of balance, and it is time to get things right again.
-
AuthorPosts
