Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 2, 2008 at 11:36 PM in reply to: Representatives that elected for this bailout should NOT be relected! #279885October 2, 2008 at 11:36 PM in reply to: Representatives that elected for this bailout should NOT be relected! #280156
patientlywaiting
ParticipantExcellent point here.
Those who change their minds will be doing so because of the sweeteners, not the substance of the bill.
October 2, 2008 at 11:36 PM in reply to: Representatives that elected for this bailout should NOT be relected! #280164patientlywaiting
ParticipantExcellent point here.
Those who change their minds will be doing so because of the sweeteners, not the substance of the bill.
October 2, 2008 at 11:36 PM in reply to: Representatives that elected for this bailout should NOT be relected! #280204patientlywaiting
ParticipantExcellent point here.
Those who change their minds will be doing so because of the sweeteners, not the substance of the bill.
October 2, 2008 at 11:36 PM in reply to: Representatives that elected for this bailout should NOT be relected! #280217patientlywaiting
ParticipantExcellent point here.
Those who change their minds will be doing so because of the sweeteners, not the substance of the bill.
patientlywaiting
ParticipantI know that I’ll be called sexist but I’ll take that risk. It’s usually the wife who wants children. The husband just agrees.
That’s why the wife who controls the baby making needs to think about it real hard until she is sure that her guy will stick around and provide for the family.
Having children is no way to insure that a man will stick around. Emotional women think that having children will create ties that bind/obligate forever but that is not the case anymore.
Cheating is not even an issue and should not play a part in the division of assets. There is no law against cheating and nothing said the wife should get more assets because of infidelity. The wife may feel that way, but it’s not the law.
If the husband was physically abusive then file charges.
It doesn’t look like your friend’s family has a lot of money to divide.
Tell him to get it over with so he can start a new life.
Let the court divide the assets/liabilities. The judge will look at the husband’s salary and decide how to split it.
There’s only so much money, so the husband will be given enough to survive on so he can continue to earn money. And the wife will be required to get a job. Simple as that.
Now if the husband wants to play hardball, then he can quit his job, then everyone is up the creek.
I’m a man, so you’ll understand my standing up for my “brothers”. π
patientlywaiting
ParticipantI know that I’ll be called sexist but I’ll take that risk. It’s usually the wife who wants children. The husband just agrees.
That’s why the wife who controls the baby making needs to think about it real hard until she is sure that her guy will stick around and provide for the family.
Having children is no way to insure that a man will stick around. Emotional women think that having children will create ties that bind/obligate forever but that is not the case anymore.
Cheating is not even an issue and should not play a part in the division of assets. There is no law against cheating and nothing said the wife should get more assets because of infidelity. The wife may feel that way, but it’s not the law.
If the husband was physically abusive then file charges.
It doesn’t look like your friend’s family has a lot of money to divide.
Tell him to get it over with so he can start a new life.
Let the court divide the assets/liabilities. The judge will look at the husband’s salary and decide how to split it.
There’s only so much money, so the husband will be given enough to survive on so he can continue to earn money. And the wife will be required to get a job. Simple as that.
Now if the husband wants to play hardball, then he can quit his job, then everyone is up the creek.
I’m a man, so you’ll understand my standing up for my “brothers”. π
patientlywaiting
ParticipantI know that I’ll be called sexist but I’ll take that risk. It’s usually the wife who wants children. The husband just agrees.
That’s why the wife who controls the baby making needs to think about it real hard until she is sure that her guy will stick around and provide for the family.
Having children is no way to insure that a man will stick around. Emotional women think that having children will create ties that bind/obligate forever but that is not the case anymore.
Cheating is not even an issue and should not play a part in the division of assets. There is no law against cheating and nothing said the wife should get more assets because of infidelity. The wife may feel that way, but it’s not the law.
If the husband was physically abusive then file charges.
It doesn’t look like your friend’s family has a lot of money to divide.
Tell him to get it over with so he can start a new life.
Let the court divide the assets/liabilities. The judge will look at the husband’s salary and decide how to split it.
There’s only so much money, so the husband will be given enough to survive on so he can continue to earn money. And the wife will be required to get a job. Simple as that.
Now if the husband wants to play hardball, then he can quit his job, then everyone is up the creek.
I’m a man, so you’ll understand my standing up for my “brothers”. π
patientlywaiting
ParticipantI know that I’ll be called sexist but I’ll take that risk. It’s usually the wife who wants children. The husband just agrees.
That’s why the wife who controls the baby making needs to think about it real hard until she is sure that her guy will stick around and provide for the family.
Having children is no way to insure that a man will stick around. Emotional women think that having children will create ties that bind/obligate forever but that is not the case anymore.
Cheating is not even an issue and should not play a part in the division of assets. There is no law against cheating and nothing said the wife should get more assets because of infidelity. The wife may feel that way, but it’s not the law.
If the husband was physically abusive then file charges.
It doesn’t look like your friend’s family has a lot of money to divide.
Tell him to get it over with so he can start a new life.
Let the court divide the assets/liabilities. The judge will look at the husband’s salary and decide how to split it.
There’s only so much money, so the husband will be given enough to survive on so he can continue to earn money. And the wife will be required to get a job. Simple as that.
Now if the husband wants to play hardball, then he can quit his job, then everyone is up the creek.
I’m a man, so you’ll understand my standing up for my “brothers”. π
patientlywaiting
ParticipantI know that I’ll be called sexist but I’ll take that risk. It’s usually the wife who wants children. The husband just agrees.
That’s why the wife who controls the baby making needs to think about it real hard until she is sure that her guy will stick around and provide for the family.
Having children is no way to insure that a man will stick around. Emotional women think that having children will create ties that bind/obligate forever but that is not the case anymore.
Cheating is not even an issue and should not play a part in the division of assets. There is no law against cheating and nothing said the wife should get more assets because of infidelity. The wife may feel that way, but it’s not the law.
If the husband was physically abusive then file charges.
It doesn’t look like your friend’s family has a lot of money to divide.
Tell him to get it over with so he can start a new life.
Let the court divide the assets/liabilities. The judge will look at the husband’s salary and decide how to split it.
There’s only so much money, so the husband will be given enough to survive on so he can continue to earn money. And the wife will be required to get a job. Simple as that.
Now if the husband wants to play hardball, then he can quit his job, then everyone is up the creek.
I’m a man, so you’ll understand my standing up for my “brothers”. π
patientlywaiting
ParticipantWomen always complain about their kids and family life especially if it’s not a happy situation.
Women always want something such as more money, help picking up the kids, help watching the kids, help cleaning, etc…, even if they already agreed to taking custody and even after the divorce.
I know it’s sexist to say so, but women always find little things to manipulate. Something always comes up that requires “modifications”.
It’s better to give her her share and get her out of his hair. Be fair to her financially but require that she goes back to work immediately.
If she can’t handle custody of the kids (which she will most likely demand) then take care of them himself, pay her alimony and say goodbye. But don’t let her nag and manipulate. Set up the responsibilities clearly and hold her to the agreement. He should make sure that he lives up to his end of bargain also, so not to give her any opportunity to complain.
Lay down the law and don’t deviate.
TG must be nuts to suggest that the dad continue to live in the same household with the mom until the kids grow up. That would be torture!
BTW, I’m not a bitter husband but I’ve seen too many divorces and I know how they usually go.
patientlywaiting
ParticipantWomen always complain about their kids and family life especially if it’s not a happy situation.
Women always want something such as more money, help picking up the kids, help watching the kids, help cleaning, etc…, even if they already agreed to taking custody and even after the divorce.
I know it’s sexist to say so, but women always find little things to manipulate. Something always comes up that requires “modifications”.
It’s better to give her her share and get her out of his hair. Be fair to her financially but require that she goes back to work immediately.
If she can’t handle custody of the kids (which she will most likely demand) then take care of them himself, pay her alimony and say goodbye. But don’t let her nag and manipulate. Set up the responsibilities clearly and hold her to the agreement. He should make sure that he lives up to his end of bargain also, so not to give her any opportunity to complain.
Lay down the law and don’t deviate.
TG must be nuts to suggest that the dad continue to live in the same household with the mom until the kids grow up. That would be torture!
BTW, I’m not a bitter husband but I’ve seen too many divorces and I know how they usually go.
patientlywaiting
ParticipantWomen always complain about their kids and family life especially if it’s not a happy situation.
Women always want something such as more money, help picking up the kids, help watching the kids, help cleaning, etc…, even if they already agreed to taking custody and even after the divorce.
I know it’s sexist to say so, but women always find little things to manipulate. Something always comes up that requires “modifications”.
It’s better to give her her share and get her out of his hair. Be fair to her financially but require that she goes back to work immediately.
If she can’t handle custody of the kids (which she will most likely demand) then take care of them himself, pay her alimony and say goodbye. But don’t let her nag and manipulate. Set up the responsibilities clearly and hold her to the agreement. He should make sure that he lives up to his end of bargain also, so not to give her any opportunity to complain.
Lay down the law and don’t deviate.
TG must be nuts to suggest that the dad continue to live in the same household with the mom until the kids grow up. That would be torture!
BTW, I’m not a bitter husband but I’ve seen too many divorces and I know how they usually go.
patientlywaiting
ParticipantWomen always complain about their kids and family life especially if it’s not a happy situation.
Women always want something such as more money, help picking up the kids, help watching the kids, help cleaning, etc…, even if they already agreed to taking custody and even after the divorce.
I know it’s sexist to say so, but women always find little things to manipulate. Something always comes up that requires “modifications”.
It’s better to give her her share and get her out of his hair. Be fair to her financially but require that she goes back to work immediately.
If she can’t handle custody of the kids (which she will most likely demand) then take care of them himself, pay her alimony and say goodbye. But don’t let her nag and manipulate. Set up the responsibilities clearly and hold her to the agreement. He should make sure that he lives up to his end of bargain also, so not to give her any opportunity to complain.
Lay down the law and don’t deviate.
TG must be nuts to suggest that the dad continue to live in the same household with the mom until the kids grow up. That would be torture!
BTW, I’m not a bitter husband but I’ve seen too many divorces and I know how they usually go.
patientlywaiting
ParticipantWomen always complain about their kids and family life especially if it’s not a happy situation.
Women always want something such as more money, help picking up the kids, help watching the kids, help cleaning, etc…, even if they already agreed to taking custody and even after the divorce.
I know it’s sexist to say so, but women always find little things to manipulate. Something always comes up that requires “modifications”.
It’s better to give her her share and get her out of his hair. Be fair to her financially but require that she goes back to work immediately.
If she can’t handle custody of the kids (which she will most likely demand) then take care of them himself, pay her alimony and say goodbye. But don’t let her nag and manipulate. Set up the responsibilities clearly and hold her to the agreement. He should make sure that he lives up to his end of bargain also, so not to give her any opportunity to complain.
Lay down the law and don’t deviate.
TG must be nuts to suggest that the dad continue to live in the same household with the mom until the kids grow up. That would be torture!
BTW, I’m not a bitter husband but I’ve seen too many divorces and I know how they usually go.
-
AuthorPosts
