Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 24, 2008 at 4:33 PM in reply to: What is patriotism? (An email I wrote in response to a swipe from a friends relative) #176001March 24, 2008 at 4:33 PM in reply to: What is patriotism? (An email I wrote in response to a swipe from a friends relative) #176005
OwnerOfCalifornia
ParticipantThis on top of the wars we fight and the taxes we pay is just an unbearable act and under no justification is it patriotic.
Fixed it for you.
Props for the Hank Rollins quote.
March 24, 2008 at 4:33 PM in reply to: What is patriotism? (An email I wrote in response to a swipe from a friends relative) #176009OwnerOfCalifornia
ParticipantThis on top of the wars we fight and the taxes we pay is just an unbearable act and under no justification is it patriotic.
Fixed it for you.
Props for the Hank Rollins quote.
March 24, 2008 at 4:33 PM in reply to: What is patriotism? (An email I wrote in response to a swipe from a friends relative) #176102OwnerOfCalifornia
ParticipantThis on top of the wars we fight and the taxes we pay is just an unbearable act and under no justification is it patriotic.
Fixed it for you.
Props for the Hank Rollins quote.
February 22, 2008 at 11:28 AM in reply to: A midnight snack for the Bears wandering around in the dark #157689OwnerOfCalifornia
Participantactually there are two things I see becoming really big within a couple of years.
Well?
You can keep it general (e.g. solar energy, fresh water supply).
February 22, 2008 at 11:28 AM in reply to: A midnight snack for the Bears wandering around in the dark #157978OwnerOfCalifornia
Participantactually there are two things I see becoming really big within a couple of years.
Well?
You can keep it general (e.g. solar energy, fresh water supply).
February 22, 2008 at 11:28 AM in reply to: A midnight snack for the Bears wandering around in the dark #157990OwnerOfCalifornia
Participantactually there are two things I see becoming really big within a couple of years.
Well?
You can keep it general (e.g. solar energy, fresh water supply).
February 22, 2008 at 11:28 AM in reply to: A midnight snack for the Bears wandering around in the dark #157997OwnerOfCalifornia
Participantactually there are two things I see becoming really big within a couple of years.
Well?
You can keep it general (e.g. solar energy, fresh water supply).
February 22, 2008 at 11:28 AM in reply to: A midnight snack for the Bears wandering around in the dark #158071OwnerOfCalifornia
Participantactually there are two things I see becoming really big within a couple of years.
Well?
You can keep it general (e.g. solar energy, fresh water supply).
February 21, 2008 at 12:37 PM in reply to: Something to consider for those of you looking for a foreclosure in the suburbs #157031OwnerOfCalifornia
ParticipantWorks fine for families all over the world. Used to work just fine for families here a few decades back. People won’t do it unless they have no other choice, though, that’s for sure…
Exactly. There’s some inside-the-box thinking in this thread. If families need to choose between homelessness, and area of no utility with unaffordable transportation and electricity costs, or a low-footprint, walkable area, I think they’ll choose the third one. Attitudes will change when new circumstances compel them to change. Americans may stop loving their cars, too much sqft, BBQ’s, and consumer junk because those attitudes won’t make economic sense. That may not happen a year from now or three years from now, but the 60-year suburban paradigm looks like it can’t continue for everyone.
I live in CV and my biggest complaint is the appalling lack of public transportation. There area is otherwise very walkable and I love that. I walk to work and the store, but there’s no easy way to get outside the CV area without driving. (If taking the bus is for losers, then call me Lane Kiffin).
Again, maybe downtown condos aren’t the answer. Maybe we’ll see the kind of high density development patientlywaiting discussed. I asked about downtown San Diego, because admittedly I may be interested in the area in a few years (or some other city from where I can telecommute).
February 21, 2008 at 12:37 PM in reply to: Something to consider for those of you looking for a foreclosure in the suburbs #157316OwnerOfCalifornia
ParticipantWorks fine for families all over the world. Used to work just fine for families here a few decades back. People won’t do it unless they have no other choice, though, that’s for sure…
Exactly. There’s some inside-the-box thinking in this thread. If families need to choose between homelessness, and area of no utility with unaffordable transportation and electricity costs, or a low-footprint, walkable area, I think they’ll choose the third one. Attitudes will change when new circumstances compel them to change. Americans may stop loving their cars, too much sqft, BBQ’s, and consumer junk because those attitudes won’t make economic sense. That may not happen a year from now or three years from now, but the 60-year suburban paradigm looks like it can’t continue for everyone.
I live in CV and my biggest complaint is the appalling lack of public transportation. There area is otherwise very walkable and I love that. I walk to work and the store, but there’s no easy way to get outside the CV area without driving. (If taking the bus is for losers, then call me Lane Kiffin).
Again, maybe downtown condos aren’t the answer. Maybe we’ll see the kind of high density development patientlywaiting discussed. I asked about downtown San Diego, because admittedly I may be interested in the area in a few years (or some other city from where I can telecommute).
February 21, 2008 at 12:37 PM in reply to: Something to consider for those of you looking for a foreclosure in the suburbs #157333OwnerOfCalifornia
ParticipantWorks fine for families all over the world. Used to work just fine for families here a few decades back. People won’t do it unless they have no other choice, though, that’s for sure…
Exactly. There’s some inside-the-box thinking in this thread. If families need to choose between homelessness, and area of no utility with unaffordable transportation and electricity costs, or a low-footprint, walkable area, I think they’ll choose the third one. Attitudes will change when new circumstances compel them to change. Americans may stop loving their cars, too much sqft, BBQ’s, and consumer junk because those attitudes won’t make economic sense. That may not happen a year from now or three years from now, but the 60-year suburban paradigm looks like it can’t continue for everyone.
I live in CV and my biggest complaint is the appalling lack of public transportation. There area is otherwise very walkable and I love that. I walk to work and the store, but there’s no easy way to get outside the CV area without driving. (If taking the bus is for losers, then call me Lane Kiffin).
Again, maybe downtown condos aren’t the answer. Maybe we’ll see the kind of high density development patientlywaiting discussed. I asked about downtown San Diego, because admittedly I may be interested in the area in a few years (or some other city from where I can telecommute).
February 21, 2008 at 12:37 PM in reply to: Something to consider for those of you looking for a foreclosure in the suburbs #157341OwnerOfCalifornia
ParticipantWorks fine for families all over the world. Used to work just fine for families here a few decades back. People won’t do it unless they have no other choice, though, that’s for sure…
Exactly. There’s some inside-the-box thinking in this thread. If families need to choose between homelessness, and area of no utility with unaffordable transportation and electricity costs, or a low-footprint, walkable area, I think they’ll choose the third one. Attitudes will change when new circumstances compel them to change. Americans may stop loving their cars, too much sqft, BBQ’s, and consumer junk because those attitudes won’t make economic sense. That may not happen a year from now or three years from now, but the 60-year suburban paradigm looks like it can’t continue for everyone.
I live in CV and my biggest complaint is the appalling lack of public transportation. There area is otherwise very walkable and I love that. I walk to work and the store, but there’s no easy way to get outside the CV area without driving. (If taking the bus is for losers, then call me Lane Kiffin).
Again, maybe downtown condos aren’t the answer. Maybe we’ll see the kind of high density development patientlywaiting discussed. I asked about downtown San Diego, because admittedly I may be interested in the area in a few years (or some other city from where I can telecommute).
February 21, 2008 at 12:37 PM in reply to: Something to consider for those of you looking for a foreclosure in the suburbs #157409OwnerOfCalifornia
ParticipantWorks fine for families all over the world. Used to work just fine for families here a few decades back. People won’t do it unless they have no other choice, though, that’s for sure…
Exactly. There’s some inside-the-box thinking in this thread. If families need to choose between homelessness, and area of no utility with unaffordable transportation and electricity costs, or a low-footprint, walkable area, I think they’ll choose the third one. Attitudes will change when new circumstances compel them to change. Americans may stop loving their cars, too much sqft, BBQ’s, and consumer junk because those attitudes won’t make economic sense. That may not happen a year from now or three years from now, but the 60-year suburban paradigm looks like it can’t continue for everyone.
I live in CV and my biggest complaint is the appalling lack of public transportation. There area is otherwise very walkable and I love that. I walk to work and the store, but there’s no easy way to get outside the CV area without driving. (If taking the bus is for losers, then call me Lane Kiffin).
Again, maybe downtown condos aren’t the answer. Maybe we’ll see the kind of high density development patientlywaiting discussed. I asked about downtown San Diego, because admittedly I may be interested in the area in a few years (or some other city from where I can telecommute).
OwnerOfCalifornia
ParticipantWTS:
I’m not going to ‘out’ you, but given the information you’ve presented here, like sdr, I think I can tell which one is yours on sdlookup. It looks like you should expect to negotiate that price. Rather than asking a buyer to justify his offer, you simply have two choices:
1. counter
2. don’t counterI live in CV, and I’d agree with you that sfr pricing here is resilient (unlike condos), but time will tell.
-
AuthorPosts
