Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 14, 2008 at 12:50 AM in reply to: DR Horton UnAuction of new homes at up to 50% off #153387orthofrancisParticipant
It can be – just like a new fur coat.
Conservatism is brain damage.orthofrancisParticipantIt can be – just like a new fur coat.
Conservatism is brain damage.orthofrancisParticipantIt can be – just like a new fur coat.
Conservatism is brain damage.orthofrancisParticipantIt can be – just like a new fur coat.
Conservatism is brain damage.orthofrancisParticipantIt can be – just like a new fur coat.
Conservatism is brain damage.February 10, 2008 at 8:43 AM in reply to: How come no talk of the 2nd wave of mortgage resets (ie. option ARMs) in 2009-2012?!? #150720orthofrancisParticipantThese loans are doing horribly – something like 90%!!(yes – I was shocked to see that) of the loans are only having minimum payments made, thus acquiring negative amortization. These loans are then expected to default EARLIER than the CreditSuisse table above.
So – no capital investment in a house = smarter to walk away. The former “owners” were really only renting the house, and they have no equity in it. This is going to be really bad here in California, where 50% of the jumbo loans are made.
I expect future bank behavior will require a minimum 20-30% down for future loans, to prevent such behavior happening again. An investment will tie the owner into the house (I worked hard for it – I don’t want to lose it), making them them much less likely to walk away.
February 10, 2008 at 8:43 AM in reply to: How come no talk of the 2nd wave of mortgage resets (ie. option ARMs) in 2009-2012?!? #150981orthofrancisParticipantThese loans are doing horribly – something like 90%!!(yes – I was shocked to see that) of the loans are only having minimum payments made, thus acquiring negative amortization. These loans are then expected to default EARLIER than the CreditSuisse table above.
So – no capital investment in a house = smarter to walk away. The former “owners” were really only renting the house, and they have no equity in it. This is going to be really bad here in California, where 50% of the jumbo loans are made.
I expect future bank behavior will require a minimum 20-30% down for future loans, to prevent such behavior happening again. An investment will tie the owner into the house (I worked hard for it – I don’t want to lose it), making them them much less likely to walk away.
February 10, 2008 at 8:43 AM in reply to: How come no talk of the 2nd wave of mortgage resets (ie. option ARMs) in 2009-2012?!? #150988orthofrancisParticipantThese loans are doing horribly – something like 90%!!(yes – I was shocked to see that) of the loans are only having minimum payments made, thus acquiring negative amortization. These loans are then expected to default EARLIER than the CreditSuisse table above.
So – no capital investment in a house = smarter to walk away. The former “owners” were really only renting the house, and they have no equity in it. This is going to be really bad here in California, where 50% of the jumbo loans are made.
I expect future bank behavior will require a minimum 20-30% down for future loans, to prevent such behavior happening again. An investment will tie the owner into the house (I worked hard for it – I don’t want to lose it), making them them much less likely to walk away.
February 10, 2008 at 8:43 AM in reply to: How come no talk of the 2nd wave of mortgage resets (ie. option ARMs) in 2009-2012?!? #151007orthofrancisParticipantThese loans are doing horribly – something like 90%!!(yes – I was shocked to see that) of the loans are only having minimum payments made, thus acquiring negative amortization. These loans are then expected to default EARLIER than the CreditSuisse table above.
So – no capital investment in a house = smarter to walk away. The former “owners” were really only renting the house, and they have no equity in it. This is going to be really bad here in California, where 50% of the jumbo loans are made.
I expect future bank behavior will require a minimum 20-30% down for future loans, to prevent such behavior happening again. An investment will tie the owner into the house (I worked hard for it – I don’t want to lose it), making them them much less likely to walk away.
February 10, 2008 at 8:43 AM in reply to: How come no talk of the 2nd wave of mortgage resets (ie. option ARMs) in 2009-2012?!? #151079orthofrancisParticipantThese loans are doing horribly – something like 90%!!(yes – I was shocked to see that) of the loans are only having minimum payments made, thus acquiring negative amortization. These loans are then expected to default EARLIER than the CreditSuisse table above.
So – no capital investment in a house = smarter to walk away. The former “owners” were really only renting the house, and they have no equity in it. This is going to be really bad here in California, where 50% of the jumbo loans are made.
I expect future bank behavior will require a minimum 20-30% down for future loans, to prevent such behavior happening again. An investment will tie the owner into the house (I worked hard for it – I don’t want to lose it), making them them much less likely to walk away.
orthofrancisParticipantIn 2002 the Down was averaging around 8500 – not quite half of this years 14,000. so they are roughly keeping on par with each other.
orthofrancisParticipantIn 2002 the Down was averaging around 8500 – not quite half of this years 14,000. so they are roughly keeping on par with each other.
orthofrancisParticipantIn 2002 the Down was averaging around 8500 – not quite half of this years 14,000. so they are roughly keeping on par with each other.
orthofrancisParticipantI imagine they are setting fires to get insurance money from houses that haven’t sold.
But seriously, the cost of building new houses should be cheaper now, because demand is down. Fewer houses being built = cheaper labor, cheaper supplies, etc. Good for us.
-
AuthorPosts