[ocrenter]

I found this company from the Chinese yellow pages. He does speak English.

Andy’s moving Co
Tel: 858-229-7795

charges $90/hour. wrapped everything and no damages at all. we tried one of the typical commercial moving companies before and the amount of damage was unreal.

[ocrenter]

I found this company from the Chinese yellow pages. He does speak English.

Andy’s moving Co
Tel: 858-229-7795

charges $90/hour. wrapped everything and no damages at all. we tried one of the typical commercial moving companies before and the amount of damage was unreal.

[ocrenter]

so far the only medical problem scientifically linked is childhood leukemia. and looks like as long as you are 2000 feet away you should be perfectly fine.

the issue is you buy a house now, and ten years down the road they find more damaging evidence against EMF. you won’t be able to sell that house ever.

[ocrenter]

so far the only medical problem scientifically linked is childhood leukemia. and looks like as long as you are 2000 feet away you should be perfectly fine.

the issue is you buy a house now, and ten years down the road they find more damaging evidence against EMF. you won’t be able to sell that house ever.

[ocrenter]

so far the only medical problem scientifically linked is childhood leukemia. and looks like as long as you are 2000 feet away you should be perfectly fine.

the issue is you buy a house now, and ten years down the road they find more damaging evidence against EMF. you won’t be able to sell that house ever.

[ocrenter]

so far the only medical problem scientifically linked is childhood leukemia. and looks like as long as you are 2000 feet away you should be perfectly fine.

the issue is you buy a house now, and ten years down the road they find more damaging evidence against EMF. you won’t be able to sell that house ever.

[ocrenter]

so far the only medical problem scientifically linked is childhood leukemia. and looks like as long as you are 2000 feet away you should be perfectly fine.

the issue is you buy a house now, and ten years down the road they find more damaging evidence against EMF. you won’t be able to sell that house ever.

[ocrenter]

[quote=SD Realtor]There is nothing fishy about this sale. Listing agent is Battiata and selling agent is Keller Williams. Sorry guys. On a ppsf it is a bit over 200 ppsf. It sold for 1.855M in 06 and 1.22 now. So why the whining? The buyer financed 860k. [/quote]

SDR is right. that is still a huge drop from 06 pricing. the 990k asking was typical “short sale low asking” tactic.

here’s a nearby “new purchase straight from the builder” that backs to a busy street avg ~45mph:

15035 Applewood Ct, San Diego, CA 92131
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,599 sq ft
–04/16/2009: purchased by a SD Charger for $1,500,000

a couple of doors down someone scored the same house from Shea around the same time for $1 million flat.

this market is filled with great buys and “say what?” deals, that’s just how it is.

[ocrenter]

[quote=SD Realtor]There is nothing fishy about this sale. Listing agent is Battiata and selling agent is Keller Williams. Sorry guys. On a ppsf it is a bit over 200 ppsf. It sold for 1.855M in 06 and 1.22 now. So why the whining? The buyer financed 860k. [/quote]

SDR is right. that is still a huge drop from 06 pricing. the 990k asking was typical “short sale low asking” tactic.

here’s a nearby “new purchase straight from the builder” that backs to a busy street avg ~45mph:

15035 Applewood Ct, San Diego, CA 92131
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,599 sq ft
–04/16/2009: purchased by a SD Charger for $1,500,000

a couple of doors down someone scored the same house from Shea around the same time for $1 million flat.

this market is filled with great buys and “say what?” deals, that’s just how it is.

[ocrenter]

[quote=SD Realtor]There is nothing fishy about this sale. Listing agent is Battiata and selling agent is Keller Williams. Sorry guys. On a ppsf it is a bit over 200 ppsf. It sold for 1.855M in 06 and 1.22 now. So why the whining? The buyer financed 860k. [/quote]

SDR is right. that is still a huge drop from 06 pricing. the 990k asking was typical “short sale low asking” tactic.

here’s a nearby “new purchase straight from the builder” that backs to a busy street avg ~45mph:

15035 Applewood Ct, San Diego, CA 92131
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,599 sq ft
–04/16/2009: purchased by a SD Charger for $1,500,000

a couple of doors down someone scored the same house from Shea around the same time for $1 million flat.

this market is filled with great buys and “say what?” deals, that’s just how it is.

[ocrenter]

[quote=SD Realtor]There is nothing fishy about this sale. Listing agent is Battiata and selling agent is Keller Williams. Sorry guys. On a ppsf it is a bit over 200 ppsf. It sold for 1.855M in 06 and 1.22 now. So why the whining? The buyer financed 860k. [/quote]

SDR is right. that is still a huge drop from 06 pricing. the 990k asking was typical “short sale low asking” tactic.

here’s a nearby “new purchase straight from the builder” that backs to a busy street avg ~45mph:

15035 Applewood Ct, San Diego, CA 92131
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,599 sq ft
–04/16/2009: purchased by a SD Charger for $1,500,000

a couple of doors down someone scored the same house from Shea around the same time for $1 million flat.

this market is filled with great buys and “say what?” deals, that’s just how it is.

[ocrenter]

[quote=SD Realtor]There is nothing fishy about this sale. Listing agent is Battiata and selling agent is Keller Williams. Sorry guys. On a ppsf it is a bit over 200 ppsf. It sold for 1.855M in 06 and 1.22 now. So why the whining? The buyer financed 860k. [/quote]

SDR is right. that is still a huge drop from 06 pricing. the 990k asking was typical “short sale low asking” tactic.

here’s a nearby “new purchase straight from the builder” that backs to a busy street avg ~45mph:

15035 Applewood Ct, San Diego, CA 92131
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,599 sq ft
–04/16/2009: purchased by a SD Charger for $1,500,000

a couple of doors down someone scored the same house from Shea around the same time for $1 million flat.

this market is filled with great buys and “say what?” deals, that’s just how it is.

[ocrenter]

[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]

The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.

The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.

but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.

so why not divide by four?

or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.

the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.

[ocrenter]

[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]

The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.

The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.

but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.

so why not divide by four?

or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.

the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.

[ocrenter]

[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]

The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.

The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.

but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.

so why not divide by four?

or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.

the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.

[Author]

Posts