Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ocrenter
ParticipantI found this company from the Chinese yellow pages. He does speak English.
Andy’s moving Co
Tel: 858-229-7795charges $90/hour. wrapped everything and no damages at all. we tried one of the typical commercial moving companies before and the amount of damage was unreal.
ocrenter
Participantso far the only medical problem scientifically linked is childhood leukemia. and looks like as long as you are 2000 feet away you should be perfectly fine.
the issue is you buy a house now, and ten years down the road they find more damaging evidence against EMF. you won’t be able to sell that house ever.
ocrenter
Participantso far the only medical problem scientifically linked is childhood leukemia. and looks like as long as you are 2000 feet away you should be perfectly fine.
the issue is you buy a house now, and ten years down the road they find more damaging evidence against EMF. you won’t be able to sell that house ever.
ocrenter
Participantso far the only medical problem scientifically linked is childhood leukemia. and looks like as long as you are 2000 feet away you should be perfectly fine.
the issue is you buy a house now, and ten years down the road they find more damaging evidence against EMF. you won’t be able to sell that house ever.
ocrenter
Participantso far the only medical problem scientifically linked is childhood leukemia. and looks like as long as you are 2000 feet away you should be perfectly fine.
the issue is you buy a house now, and ten years down the road they find more damaging evidence against EMF. you won’t be able to sell that house ever.
ocrenter
Participantso far the only medical problem scientifically linked is childhood leukemia. and looks like as long as you are 2000 feet away you should be perfectly fine.
the issue is you buy a house now, and ten years down the road they find more damaging evidence against EMF. you won’t be able to sell that house ever.
ocrenter
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]There is nothing fishy about this sale. Listing agent is Battiata and selling agent is Keller Williams. Sorry guys. On a ppsf it is a bit over 200 ppsf. It sold for 1.855M in 06 and 1.22 now. So why the whining? The buyer financed 860k. [/quote]
SDR is right. that is still a huge drop from 06 pricing. the 990k asking was typical “short sale low asking” tactic.
here’s a nearby “new purchase straight from the builder” that backs to a busy street avg ~45mph:
15035 Applewood Ct, San Diego, CA 92131
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,599 sq ft
–04/16/2009: purchased by a SD Charger for $1,500,000a couple of doors down someone scored the same house from Shea around the same time for $1 million flat.
this market is filled with great buys and “say what?” deals, that’s just how it is.
ocrenter
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]There is nothing fishy about this sale. Listing agent is Battiata and selling agent is Keller Williams. Sorry guys. On a ppsf it is a bit over 200 ppsf. It sold for 1.855M in 06 and 1.22 now. So why the whining? The buyer financed 860k. [/quote]
SDR is right. that is still a huge drop from 06 pricing. the 990k asking was typical “short sale low asking” tactic.
here’s a nearby “new purchase straight from the builder” that backs to a busy street avg ~45mph:
15035 Applewood Ct, San Diego, CA 92131
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,599 sq ft
–04/16/2009: purchased by a SD Charger for $1,500,000a couple of doors down someone scored the same house from Shea around the same time for $1 million flat.
this market is filled with great buys and “say what?” deals, that’s just how it is.
ocrenter
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]There is nothing fishy about this sale. Listing agent is Battiata and selling agent is Keller Williams. Sorry guys. On a ppsf it is a bit over 200 ppsf. It sold for 1.855M in 06 and 1.22 now. So why the whining? The buyer financed 860k. [/quote]
SDR is right. that is still a huge drop from 06 pricing. the 990k asking was typical “short sale low asking” tactic.
here’s a nearby “new purchase straight from the builder” that backs to a busy street avg ~45mph:
15035 Applewood Ct, San Diego, CA 92131
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,599 sq ft
–04/16/2009: purchased by a SD Charger for $1,500,000a couple of doors down someone scored the same house from Shea around the same time for $1 million flat.
this market is filled with great buys and “say what?” deals, that’s just how it is.
ocrenter
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]There is nothing fishy about this sale. Listing agent is Battiata and selling agent is Keller Williams. Sorry guys. On a ppsf it is a bit over 200 ppsf. It sold for 1.855M in 06 and 1.22 now. So why the whining? The buyer financed 860k. [/quote]
SDR is right. that is still a huge drop from 06 pricing. the 990k asking was typical “short sale low asking” tactic.
here’s a nearby “new purchase straight from the builder” that backs to a busy street avg ~45mph:
15035 Applewood Ct, San Diego, CA 92131
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,599 sq ft
–04/16/2009: purchased by a SD Charger for $1,500,000a couple of doors down someone scored the same house from Shea around the same time for $1 million flat.
this market is filled with great buys and “say what?” deals, that’s just how it is.
ocrenter
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]There is nothing fishy about this sale. Listing agent is Battiata and selling agent is Keller Williams. Sorry guys. On a ppsf it is a bit over 200 ppsf. It sold for 1.855M in 06 and 1.22 now. So why the whining? The buyer financed 860k. [/quote]
SDR is right. that is still a huge drop from 06 pricing. the 990k asking was typical “short sale low asking” tactic.
here’s a nearby “new purchase straight from the builder” that backs to a busy street avg ~45mph:
15035 Applewood Ct, San Diego, CA 92131
–5 beds, 5.5 baths, 5,599 sq ft
–04/16/2009: purchased by a SD Charger for $1,500,000a couple of doors down someone scored the same house from Shea around the same time for $1 million flat.
this market is filled with great buys and “say what?” deals, that’s just how it is.
June 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM in reply to: San Diego Unified SD: Trustee spearheads idea to divide school district #413539ocrenter
Participant[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.
The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.
June 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM in reply to: San Diego Unified SD: Trustee spearheads idea to divide school district #413777ocrenter
Participant[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.
The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.
June 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM in reply to: San Diego Unified SD: Trustee spearheads idea to divide school district #414027ocrenter
Participant[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.
The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.
-
AuthorPosts
