Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ocrenter
Participant[quote=SkyRanchOwner]It will be interesting to see where this one closes:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-110013145-7078_Mariposa_St_Santee_CA_92071
Beds/Baths: 5 / 5
Est Square Feet: 4,386 sf
PPSF: $182
Acres: 0.250
4 Car, Split Garage
PoolBeautiful spanish mediterranean hacienda with casita in the sky ranch community of stone ridge. Unobstructed sunset views including mount helix & cowles mountain. Was the most popular plan when available, no plans to build more. Over? Acre of prime view and premium location lot. This is your chance. One of the few homes to have 4 full garage stalls that accommodate 4 cars. 4386 sqft of living space (from builder’s brochure) which includes 5 bedrooms, 4.5 baths, casita and office.
This courtyard home also features extra wide halls and stairs with solar tube, auto lights in bathrooms, water heater pump for quick hot water anywhere in the home. Tons of upgrades including custom window coverings and flooring, designer colors, recessed lighting in bedrooms, ceiling fans in all bedrooms with independent light switches, whole house fan and instant light fireplaces (flip a switch). Also a fantastic custom saltwater pool and spa that completes the entire package. Upgraded interlocking pavers along with gas connection for outdoor kitchen or bbq if you like. The grounds are a gardener’s delight with beautiful design and plantings. The ideal place for family gatherings or social events. This home is better than new with so many upgrades and lovingly cared for by original owners. See for yourself, the value is here and this home is perfect. Xtra rm 1 is independant casita and xtra rm 2 is den. Master bedroom has 18×12 walk in closet.
——————
Also, this one closed recently:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100026032-7228_Ocotillo_St_Santee_CA_92071$811,000!
Sky ranch top of the mountain with ocean and mountain views 360 degrees own the best home on the best lot in sky ranch highly desired #4 plan only 7 built turn key all designer upgrades inside & out fully landscaped 5 bedrooms 4.5 baths 4908 sf & a 4 car garage room for extra parking hardwood floors granite counter tops professional stainless appliances 2 fireplaces huge master suite with sitting area see supplement open
Lovely courtyard with firepit, custom low voltage lighting, ceiling fans, wood floors, upgraded carpet, built in bookcases, water filter, custom paint w/ 8″ crown molding, side yard w/ storage, surround sound in fam rm, 1,200 master suite w/ sitting area & nursery or office, 2 zoned central heat & air, vegi garden, avocado trees, ge monogram professional series appliances, wine cellar, & outdoor lighting, last sale of this model sold for over 1 million[/quote]
officially 50 days on the market. time to lower expectation and drop the price.
SROwner, any reason why the Ocotillo home went for nearly 800k back in late 2008 while the current home for sale went for 690k?
Participantstrad, I say get your reference letter and get out. dont burn any bridges, even if your intention is good. this isn’t your fight. the boss will likely jeopardize your future job opportunities. you never know what that intoxicated mind is capable of.
Participantstrad, I say get your reference letter and get out. dont burn any bridges, even if your intention is good. this isn’t your fight. the boss will likely jeopardize your future job opportunities. you never know what that intoxicated mind is capable of.
Participantstrad, I say get your reference letter and get out. dont burn any bridges, even if your intention is good. this isn’t your fight. the boss will likely jeopardize your future job opportunities. you never know what that intoxicated mind is capable of.
Participantstrad, I say get your reference letter and get out. dont burn any bridges, even if your intention is good. this isn’t your fight. the boss will likely jeopardize your future job opportunities. you never know what that intoxicated mind is capable of.
Participantstrad, I say get your reference letter and get out. dont burn any bridges, even if your intention is good. this isn’t your fight. the boss will likely jeopardize your future job opportunities. you never know what that intoxicated mind is capable of.
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
I am unfamiliar with the 56 corridor but agree with you about Eastlake. I suggested Rancho Del Rey (Belmonte) and RDR Estates (although a little too expensive) to the OP, NOT “Eastlake.” These communities are 5-7 miles west of Eastlake and Eastlake does not even compare to them.
Again, want to avoid any “misperceptions” here. Different communities of Chula Vista should not be lumped together as one. It is a medium-sized diverse city.[/quote]
yes, but it is still Chula Vista. call me snobby, but I just can’t get myself to write down Chula Vista as my address.
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
I am unfamiliar with the 56 corridor but agree with you about Eastlake. I suggested Rancho Del Rey (Belmonte) and RDR Estates (although a little too expensive) to the OP, NOT “Eastlake.” These communities are 5-7 miles west of Eastlake and Eastlake does not even compare to them.
Again, want to avoid any “misperceptions” here. Different communities of Chula Vista should not be lumped together as one. It is a medium-sized diverse city.[/quote]
yes, but it is still Chula Vista. call me snobby, but I just can’t get myself to write down Chula Vista as my address.
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
I am unfamiliar with the 56 corridor but agree with you about Eastlake. I suggested Rancho Del Rey (Belmonte) and RDR Estates (although a little too expensive) to the OP, NOT “Eastlake.” These communities are 5-7 miles west of Eastlake and Eastlake does not even compare to them.
Again, want to avoid any “misperceptions” here. Different communities of Chula Vista should not be lumped together as one. It is a medium-sized diverse city.[/quote]
yes, but it is still Chula Vista. call me snobby, but I just can’t get myself to write down Chula Vista as my address.
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
I am unfamiliar with the 56 corridor but agree with you about Eastlake. I suggested Rancho Del Rey (Belmonte) and RDR Estates (although a little too expensive) to the OP, NOT “Eastlake.” These communities are 5-7 miles west of Eastlake and Eastlake does not even compare to them.
Again, want to avoid any “misperceptions” here. Different communities of Chula Vista should not be lumped together as one. It is a medium-sized diverse city.[/quote]
yes, but it is still Chula Vista. call me snobby, but I just can’t get myself to write down Chula Vista as my address.
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
I am unfamiliar with the 56 corridor but agree with you about Eastlake. I suggested Rancho Del Rey (Belmonte) and RDR Estates (although a little too expensive) to the OP, NOT “Eastlake.” These communities are 5-7 miles west of Eastlake and Eastlake does not even compare to them.
Again, want to avoid any “misperceptions” here. Different communities of Chula Vista should not be lumped together as one. It is a medium-sized diverse city.[/quote]
yes, but it is still Chula Vista. call me snobby, but I just can’t get myself to write down Chula Vista as my address.
Participant[quote=UCGal]
BG –
The post office (Feds) determine zip code boundaries. Not the city.They have some correlation – but not one to one – in guessing government jurisdiction.
I think you’re confusing things when you look at it strictly by zipcode.
I was curious – so I looked for a map of the city of san diego boundaries… As I said – I don’t know how accurate it is – but it seems accurate. It also roughly matches what I saw on the city website.
http://www.sandiego.gov/citycouncil/Another common mistake is to assume school districts follow city boundaries. They don’t. Parts of PQ are in PUSD. Carmel Valley is not in SDUSD even though it’s part of the city.[/quote]
UCGal, you are absolutely correct. the city of SD never annexed the area of 4S. because it had the strip of 92127 next to I-15, I think this is why BG mistook the entire 92127 for 4S.
I know the numbering convention of “921xx” to signify city of SD, but these conventions does not always fit.
City boundaries definitely do not have to follow zip codes. back in LA, people would advertise that they live in “Beverly Hill zip code” because even though they are not in BH, the fact that they shared the BH zip made their property value higher.
Quite frankly, sometimes a city doesn’t even have to be in the same county, or even the same state. Atlanta encompasses several counties, and Kansas City is in 2 states.
Participant[quote=UCGal]
BG –
The post office (Feds) determine zip code boundaries. Not the city.They have some correlation – but not one to one – in guessing government jurisdiction.
I think you’re confusing things when you look at it strictly by zipcode.
I was curious – so I looked for a map of the city of san diego boundaries… As I said – I don’t know how accurate it is – but it seems accurate. It also roughly matches what I saw on the city website.
http://www.sandiego.gov/citycouncil/Another common mistake is to assume school districts follow city boundaries. They don’t. Parts of PQ are in PUSD. Carmel Valley is not in SDUSD even though it’s part of the city.[/quote]
UCGal, you are absolutely correct. the city of SD never annexed the area of 4S. because it had the strip of 92127 next to I-15, I think this is why BG mistook the entire 92127 for 4S.
I know the numbering convention of “921xx” to signify city of SD, but these conventions does not always fit.
City boundaries definitely do not have to follow zip codes. back in LA, people would advertise that they live in “Beverly Hill zip code” because even though they are not in BH, the fact that they shared the BH zip made their property value higher.
Quite frankly, sometimes a city doesn’t even have to be in the same county, or even the same state. Atlanta encompasses several counties, and Kansas City is in 2 states.
Participant[quote=UCGal]
BG –
The post office (Feds) determine zip code boundaries. Not the city.They have some correlation – but not one to one – in guessing government jurisdiction.
I think you’re confusing things when you look at it strictly by zipcode.
I was curious – so I looked for a map of the city of san diego boundaries… As I said – I don’t know how accurate it is – but it seems accurate. It also roughly matches what I saw on the city website.
http://www.sandiego.gov/citycouncil/Another common mistake is to assume school districts follow city boundaries. They don’t. Parts of PQ are in PUSD. Carmel Valley is not in SDUSD even though it’s part of the city.[/quote]
UCGal, you are absolutely correct. the city of SD never annexed the area of 4S. because it had the strip of 92127 next to I-15, I think this is why BG mistook the entire 92127 for 4S.
I know the numbering convention of “921xx” to signify city of SD, but these conventions does not always fit.
City boundaries definitely do not have to follow zip codes. back in LA, people would advertise that they live in “Beverly Hill zip code” because even though they are not in BH, the fact that they shared the BH zip made their property value higher.
Quite frankly, sometimes a city doesn’t even have to be in the same county, or even the same state. Atlanta encompasses several counties, and Kansas City is in 2 states.
-
AuthorPosts
