Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
mike92104
ParticipantI could support losing the tax credits for second homes. It amazes that that no one ever thinks about spending less money.
ParticipantI could support losing the tax credits for second homes. It amazes that that no one ever thinks about spending less money.
ParticipantI could support losing the tax credits for second homes. It amazes that that no one ever thinks about spending less money.
Participant[quote=andymajumder]I know I can get another real estate agent….but I think I will work with her and get her to do what I want….My current agent has worked with me for the past two months and she has put in quite a lot of work (in all I have put 7 offers in the last two months, in most cases my offer price was a bit too low), and I don’t want to deprive her of her commission when I do buy. I don’t have any signed agreement with her but I would like to be fair with her.[/quote]
I would say she could get the commission on your lower offer or some other agent can. Remind her kindly that you are the client, and her relationship with the listing agent is of no concern to you.
Participant[quote=andymajumder]I know I can get another real estate agent….but I think I will work with her and get her to do what I want….My current agent has worked with me for the past two months and she has put in quite a lot of work (in all I have put 7 offers in the last two months, in most cases my offer price was a bit too low), and I don’t want to deprive her of her commission when I do buy. I don’t have any signed agreement with her but I would like to be fair with her.[/quote]
I would say she could get the commission on your lower offer or some other agent can. Remind her kindly that you are the client, and her relationship with the listing agent is of no concern to you.
Participant[quote=andymajumder]I know I can get another real estate agent….but I think I will work with her and get her to do what I want….My current agent has worked with me for the past two months and she has put in quite a lot of work (in all I have put 7 offers in the last two months, in most cases my offer price was a bit too low), and I don’t want to deprive her of her commission when I do buy. I don’t have any signed agreement with her but I would like to be fair with her.[/quote]
I would say she could get the commission on your lower offer or some other agent can. Remind her kindly that you are the client, and her relationship with the listing agent is of no concern to you.
Participant[quote=andymajumder]I know I can get another real estate agent….but I think I will work with her and get her to do what I want….My current agent has worked with me for the past two months and she has put in quite a lot of work (in all I have put 7 offers in the last two months, in most cases my offer price was a bit too low), and I don’t want to deprive her of her commission when I do buy. I don’t have any signed agreement with her but I would like to be fair with her.[/quote]
I would say she could get the commission on your lower offer or some other agent can. Remind her kindly that you are the client, and her relationship with the listing agent is of no concern to you.
Participant[quote=andymajumder]I know I can get another real estate agent….but I think I will work with her and get her to do what I want….My current agent has worked with me for the past two months and she has put in quite a lot of work (in all I have put 7 offers in the last two months, in most cases my offer price was a bit too low), and I don’t want to deprive her of her commission when I do buy. I don’t have any signed agreement with her but I would like to be fair with her.[/quote]
I would say she could get the commission on your lower offer or some other agent can. Remind her kindly that you are the client, and her relationship with the listing agent is of no concern to you.
Participant[quote=Ash Housewares][quote=Aecetia]Raising tax rates lowers tax revenue. The government is going to end up imploding if they continue down this path…Time to get your head out of the sand.[/quote]
Or not. All evidence points to the US being well onto the left side of the laffer curve, where cuts in tax rates decrease revenue. Even the early 1980s (much higher) tax rates were on the left side of the curve, as the Reagan tax cuts decreased revenue.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001-2003 beyond 2010 would increase deficits by $1.8 trillion over the following decade:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/78xx/doc7878/03-21-PresidentsBudget.pdfNice unbiased reporting by the WSJ, giving credit to Bush for the cuts, but calling their expiration Obama’s tax increase.[/quote]
Do the tax cuts increase the deficits or does the out of control spending increase the deficits?
Also, I don’t see much difference in raising taxes or allowing tax cuts to expire. Point is that taxes will go up under Obama’s watch.
Participant[quote=Ash Housewares][quote=Aecetia]Raising tax rates lowers tax revenue. The government is going to end up imploding if they continue down this path…Time to get your head out of the sand.[/quote]
Or not. All evidence points to the US being well onto the left side of the laffer curve, where cuts in tax rates decrease revenue. Even the early 1980s (much higher) tax rates were on the left side of the curve, as the Reagan tax cuts decreased revenue.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001-2003 beyond 2010 would increase deficits by $1.8 trillion over the following decade:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/78xx/doc7878/03-21-PresidentsBudget.pdfNice unbiased reporting by the WSJ, giving credit to Bush for the cuts, but calling their expiration Obama’s tax increase.[/quote]
Do the tax cuts increase the deficits or does the out of control spending increase the deficits?
Also, I don’t see much difference in raising taxes or allowing tax cuts to expire. Point is that taxes will go up under Obama’s watch.
Participant[quote=Ash Housewares][quote=Aecetia]Raising tax rates lowers tax revenue. The government is going to end up imploding if they continue down this path…Time to get your head out of the sand.[/quote]
Or not. All evidence points to the US being well onto the left side of the laffer curve, where cuts in tax rates decrease revenue. Even the early 1980s (much higher) tax rates were on the left side of the curve, as the Reagan tax cuts decreased revenue.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001-2003 beyond 2010 would increase deficits by $1.8 trillion over the following decade:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/78xx/doc7878/03-21-PresidentsBudget.pdfNice unbiased reporting by the WSJ, giving credit to Bush for the cuts, but calling their expiration Obama’s tax increase.[/quote]
Do the tax cuts increase the deficits or does the out of control spending increase the deficits?
Also, I don’t see much difference in raising taxes or allowing tax cuts to expire. Point is that taxes will go up under Obama’s watch.
Participant[quote=Ash Housewares][quote=Aecetia]Raising tax rates lowers tax revenue. The government is going to end up imploding if they continue down this path…Time to get your head out of the sand.[/quote]
Or not. All evidence points to the US being well onto the left side of the laffer curve, where cuts in tax rates decrease revenue. Even the early 1980s (much higher) tax rates were on the left side of the curve, as the Reagan tax cuts decreased revenue.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001-2003 beyond 2010 would increase deficits by $1.8 trillion over the following decade:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/78xx/doc7878/03-21-PresidentsBudget.pdfNice unbiased reporting by the WSJ, giving credit to Bush for the cuts, but calling their expiration Obama’s tax increase.[/quote]
Do the tax cuts increase the deficits or does the out of control spending increase the deficits?
Also, I don’t see much difference in raising taxes or allowing tax cuts to expire. Point is that taxes will go up under Obama’s watch.
Participant[quote=Ash Housewares][quote=Aecetia]Raising tax rates lowers tax revenue. The government is going to end up imploding if they continue down this path…Time to get your head out of the sand.[/quote]
Or not. All evidence points to the US being well onto the left side of the laffer curve, where cuts in tax rates decrease revenue. Even the early 1980s (much higher) tax rates were on the left side of the curve, as the Reagan tax cuts decreased revenue.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001-2003 beyond 2010 would increase deficits by $1.8 trillion over the following decade:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/78xx/doc7878/03-21-PresidentsBudget.pdfNice unbiased reporting by the WSJ, giving credit to Bush for the cuts, but calling their expiration Obama’s tax increase.[/quote]
Do the tax cuts increase the deficits or does the out of control spending increase the deficits?
Also, I don’t see much difference in raising taxes or allowing tax cuts to expire. Point is that taxes will go up under Obama’s watch.
Participant[quote=CDMA ENG]What is the fascination with Obama losing his cool?
It’s like because he is a black man people want to see him “lose it” pull out is nickle plated 9 and get gansta on BP… Come on…
He has tempered his response appropiately… More so than other would have.
A good leader delegates… Now lets see if he picks the right delegates to get his name out of the mud/oil.
CE[/quote]
And there’s the typical response to any sort of criticism of “The Messiah” Just call people racists. I’m surprised by the use of a somewhat racist comment to do it though.
-
AuthorPosts
