[LesBaer45]

[quote=temeculaguy][quote=flu]I’m so pissed right now.
I sold Ford and Chevron yesterday think Chevron who miss earnings and Ford’s runup would end.

Chevron did miss earnings, but it’s up and Ford is $8 now…Goddamn. (had a tiny holding in Ford though anyway).

Still waiting for Shittybank to hit $10. ha ha.

Crawzy[/quote]

You are pissed, what about me? I failed to buy it when it was under $2 even though I talked about it daily, I believe people warned me about giving investment advice to others as much as I talked about it. HOG is 22+ now, so it has tripled and Ford hase gone 4x plus. I am so done with this bear crap, I’s switching sides altogether before I miss more opportunities to 3x, 4x, 5x, or 6x my money in a matter if months

Everyone is gonna get their panties in a bunch with this next comment, so without further ado:

The recession is nearing the end. There, I said it. Over the next six months we will see signs of life, by spring unemployment will turn the corner but the stock market will have already done so. Housing has this winter and early spring left for bargain hunting, this time next year, the low and high end will have converged a tad and while it wont shoot up, it will be done going down.

While I’m prognosticating, the Chargers win the division and The Lakers repeat, now I can go back to bed and mail it in since I just figured out how the next twelve months will go.[/quote]

I’ve moved my stops up just in case. I’ve already picked “targets” and have convinced myself I’m bailing when they hit, short term capital gains tax bite or not!

I didn’t jump on F, AA or MTW like I wanted to. Ran out of cash. No guts, no glory.

I’m still waiting for my WYNN and LVS to jump back to insane levels. Then I’ll know for sure it’s time to bail. 🙂

*Chargers take AFC in a squeaker when Pats fall apart after Brady is distracted by new baby + age creeping up on him.

[LesBaer45]

[quote=AN]flu, you might like this. Lutz just announced that the G8 will live on as a Chevy Caprice.[/quote]

http://jalopnik.com/5312496/pontiac-g8-to-live-on-as-chevy-caprice

This will make all the cop shops happy. Future LE vehicle of choice. V8, RWD, 4drs.

It’s Government Motors after all, might as well make them in black and white. 😉

[LesBaer45]

[quote=AN]flu, you might like this. Lutz just announced that the G8 will live on as a Chevy Caprice.[/quote]

http://jalopnik.com/5312496/pontiac-g8-to-live-on-as-chevy-caprice

This will make all the cop shops happy. Future LE vehicle of choice. V8, RWD, 4drs.

It’s Government Motors after all, might as well make them in black and white. 😉

[LesBaer45]

[quote=AN]flu, you might like this. Lutz just announced that the G8 will live on as a Chevy Caprice.[/quote]

http://jalopnik.com/5312496/pontiac-g8-to-live-on-as-chevy-caprice

This will make all the cop shops happy. Future LE vehicle of choice. V8, RWD, 4drs.

It’s Government Motors after all, might as well make them in black and white. 😉

[LesBaer45]

[quote=AN]flu, you might like this. Lutz just announced that the G8 will live on as a Chevy Caprice.[/quote]

http://jalopnik.com/5312496/pontiac-g8-to-live-on-as-chevy-caprice

This will make all the cop shops happy. Future LE vehicle of choice. V8, RWD, 4drs.

It’s Government Motors after all, might as well make them in black and white. 😉

[LesBaer45]

[quote=AN]flu, you might like this. Lutz just announced that the G8 will live on as a Chevy Caprice.[/quote]

http://jalopnik.com/5312496/pontiac-g8-to-live-on-as-chevy-caprice

This will make all the cop shops happy. Future LE vehicle of choice. V8, RWD, 4drs.

It’s Government Motors after all, might as well make them in black and white. 😉

[LesBaer45]

[quote=flu][quote=enron_by_the_sea][quote=flu]
It’s not ok for individuals to rip off IOU holders at discounted prices…

However, it’s ok for banks/institutions/brokers with “licenses” to rip off IOU holders….

[/quote]

LOL. USA is different. Here if you want to rip off someone, you need to get a license to rip off first.[/quote]

Hmm, in deciding to apply for a license to kill or a license to steal, I think I would pick the latter.

007 License to Steal….Sounds kinda cool.[/quote]

I’m probably wrong about this, but I think the SEC basically HAD to declare them a ‘security’. Otherwise I think CA would risk running afoul of other federal laws concerning the printing of ‘currency’. They decided the ‘security’ angle was better given the current status of CAs’ budget. Banning them from using the IOUs as ‘currency’ would have set off a firestorm.

But my constitutional law is weak.

*I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV or the Internet.

[LesBaer45]

[quote=flu][quote=enron_by_the_sea][quote=flu]
It’s not ok for individuals to rip off IOU holders at discounted prices…

However, it’s ok for banks/institutions/brokers with “licenses” to rip off IOU holders….

[/quote]

LOL. USA is different. Here if you want to rip off someone, you need to get a license to rip off first.[/quote]

Hmm, in deciding to apply for a license to kill or a license to steal, I think I would pick the latter.

007 License to Steal….Sounds kinda cool.[/quote]

I’m probably wrong about this, but I think the SEC basically HAD to declare them a ‘security’. Otherwise I think CA would risk running afoul of other federal laws concerning the printing of ‘currency’. They decided the ‘security’ angle was better given the current status of CAs’ budget. Banning them from using the IOUs as ‘currency’ would have set off a firestorm.

But my constitutional law is weak.

*I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV or the Internet.

[LesBaer45]

[quote=flu][quote=enron_by_the_sea][quote=flu]
It’s not ok for individuals to rip off IOU holders at discounted prices…

However, it’s ok for banks/institutions/brokers with “licenses” to rip off IOU holders….

[/quote]

LOL. USA is different. Here if you want to rip off someone, you need to get a license to rip off first.[/quote]

Hmm, in deciding to apply for a license to kill or a license to steal, I think I would pick the latter.

007 License to Steal….Sounds kinda cool.[/quote]

I’m probably wrong about this, but I think the SEC basically HAD to declare them a ‘security’. Otherwise I think CA would risk running afoul of other federal laws concerning the printing of ‘currency’. They decided the ‘security’ angle was better given the current status of CAs’ budget. Banning them from using the IOUs as ‘currency’ would have set off a firestorm.

But my constitutional law is weak.

*I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV or the Internet.

[LesBaer45]

[quote=flu][quote=enron_by_the_sea][quote=flu]
It’s not ok for individuals to rip off IOU holders at discounted prices…

However, it’s ok for banks/institutions/brokers with “licenses” to rip off IOU holders….

[/quote]

LOL. USA is different. Here if you want to rip off someone, you need to get a license to rip off first.[/quote]

Hmm, in deciding to apply for a license to kill or a license to steal, I think I would pick the latter.

007 License to Steal….Sounds kinda cool.[/quote]

I’m probably wrong about this, but I think the SEC basically HAD to declare them a ‘security’. Otherwise I think CA would risk running afoul of other federal laws concerning the printing of ‘currency’. They decided the ‘security’ angle was better given the current status of CAs’ budget. Banning them from using the IOUs as ‘currency’ would have set off a firestorm.

But my constitutional law is weak.

*I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV or the Internet.

[LesBaer45]

[quote=flu][quote=enron_by_the_sea][quote=flu]
It’s not ok for individuals to rip off IOU holders at discounted prices…

However, it’s ok for banks/institutions/brokers with “licenses” to rip off IOU holders….

[/quote]

LOL. USA is different. Here if you want to rip off someone, you need to get a license to rip off first.[/quote]

Hmm, in deciding to apply for a license to kill or a license to steal, I think I would pick the latter.

007 License to Steal….Sounds kinda cool.[/quote]

I’m probably wrong about this, but I think the SEC basically HAD to declare them a ‘security’. Otherwise I think CA would risk running afoul of other federal laws concerning the printing of ‘currency’. They decided the ‘security’ angle was better given the current status of CAs’ budget. Banning them from using the IOUs as ‘currency’ would have set off a firestorm.

But my constitutional law is weak.

*I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV or the Internet.

[LesBaer45]

[quote=CA renter]Why not start up a Pigg fund and let Allan head it up? :)[/quote]

I’m in.

Where do I send the check?

[LesBaer45]

[quote=CA renter]Why not start up a Pigg fund and let Allan head it up? :)[/quote]

I’m in.

Where do I send the check?

[LesBaer45]

[quote=CA renter]Why not start up a Pigg fund and let Allan head it up? :)[/quote]

I’m in.

Where do I send the check?

[LesBaer45]

[quote=CA renter]Why not start up a Pigg fund and let Allan head it up? :)[/quote]

I’m in.

Where do I send the check?

[Author]

Posts