Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
jonnycsdParticipant
SD Realtor, yes, I have heard the $300BB number. However, I do not see it mentioned in the NYTs coverage of the bipartisan bill coming together in the Senate.
Is the $300BB a real / approved plan? Any insight on how it will be executed? Any links to articles explaining it would be much appreciated.
jonnycsdParticipantSD Realtor, yes, I have heard the $300BB number. However, I do not see it mentioned in the NYTs coverage of the bipartisan bill coming together in the Senate.
Is the $300BB a real / approved plan? Any insight on how it will be executed? Any links to articles explaining it would be much appreciated.
jonnycsdParticipantSD Realtor, yes, I have heard the $300BB number. However, I do not see it mentioned in the NYTs coverage of the bipartisan bill coming together in the Senate.
Is the $300BB a real / approved plan? Any insight on how it will be executed? Any links to articles explaining it would be much appreciated.
jonnycsdParticipantSD Realtor, yes, I have heard the $300BB number. However, I do not see it mentioned in the NYTs coverage of the bipartisan bill coming together in the Senate.
Is the $300BB a real / approved plan? Any insight on how it will be executed? Any links to articles explaining it would be much appreciated.
jonnycsdParticipantSD Realtor, yes, I have heard the $300BB number. However, I do not see it mentioned in the NYTs coverage of the bipartisan bill coming together in the Senate.
Is the $300BB a real / approved plan? Any insight on how it will be executed? Any links to articles explaining it would be much appreciated.
jonnycsdParticipantAm I missing something here? This seems like a drop in the bucket – $4 billion in grants against against many hundreds of $billions in write downs so far (and more to come!).
And a $7K tax credit for buyers of foreclosed properties – hell that will hardly pay for new carpet and landscaping. This is just a little grease for the people who are sitting on the sidelines waiting to buy. It is a $7K gift to every Piggington waiting to buy.
Sounds to me like the senate is going to let the market take its course. Might as well be giving lenders the finger and basically telling them to F.O.
What am I missing?
jonnycsdParticipantAm I missing something here? This seems like a drop in the bucket – $4 billion in grants against against many hundreds of $billions in write downs so far (and more to come!).
And a $7K tax credit for buyers of foreclosed properties – hell that will hardly pay for new carpet and landscaping. This is just a little grease for the people who are sitting on the sidelines waiting to buy. It is a $7K gift to every Piggington waiting to buy.
Sounds to me like the senate is going to let the market take its course. Might as well be giving lenders the finger and basically telling them to F.O.
What am I missing?
jonnycsdParticipantAm I missing something here? This seems like a drop in the bucket – $4 billion in grants against against many hundreds of $billions in write downs so far (and more to come!).
And a $7K tax credit for buyers of foreclosed properties – hell that will hardly pay for new carpet and landscaping. This is just a little grease for the people who are sitting on the sidelines waiting to buy. It is a $7K gift to every Piggington waiting to buy.
Sounds to me like the senate is going to let the market take its course. Might as well be giving lenders the finger and basically telling them to F.O.
What am I missing?
jonnycsdParticipantAm I missing something here? This seems like a drop in the bucket – $4 billion in grants against against many hundreds of $billions in write downs so far (and more to come!).
And a $7K tax credit for buyers of foreclosed properties – hell that will hardly pay for new carpet and landscaping. This is just a little grease for the people who are sitting on the sidelines waiting to buy. It is a $7K gift to every Piggington waiting to buy.
Sounds to me like the senate is going to let the market take its course. Might as well be giving lenders the finger and basically telling them to F.O.
What am I missing?
jonnycsdParticipantAm I missing something here? This seems like a drop in the bucket – $4 billion in grants against against many hundreds of $billions in write downs so far (and more to come!).
And a $7K tax credit for buyers of foreclosed properties – hell that will hardly pay for new carpet and landscaping. This is just a little grease for the people who are sitting on the sidelines waiting to buy. It is a $7K gift to every Piggington waiting to buy.
Sounds to me like the senate is going to let the market take its course. Might as well be giving lenders the finger and basically telling them to F.O.
What am I missing?
March 22, 2008 at 7:11 PM in reply to: What am I missing? Is that a train coming at me or am I Chicken Little? #174841jonnycsdParticipantDWCAP – I was not suggesting that anyone should go buy real estate now. The OP sounds like a worried home owner, and I just pointed out that if someone is really worried about inflation – well real estate is a traditional inflation hedge. It has worked really well in that capacity for thousands of years.
For me and my unique situation, buying last year made sense, and still does. The ability to open a decent size dollar short position with no carrying costs is just great. The house is cool, and is a long term luxury. I don’t much care what valuation does over the next 15 years. My son will inherit our beach house some day, it will likely never be sold.
I am not following your ideas on “non-productive” investment. Are there thousands upon thousands of empty homes somewhere? For the few (in percentage terms) that are empty, will not a growing population soak that up pretty quick? If not, don’t we need a ton of new construction every year just to replace old homes that are torn down or converted to coffee shops or whatever? And since homes are long lived assets, even if a few extra were built the last three years won’t they eventually find a good use? I mean really, its not like we just built 1 million homes that will be empty, never-lived-in and rotting away 5 years from now, right? New home supply may have gotten ahead of its self a little, but, IMHO it is nothing like the valuation overhang we have.
March 22, 2008 at 7:11 PM in reply to: What am I missing? Is that a train coming at me or am I Chicken Little? #175193jonnycsdParticipantDWCAP – I was not suggesting that anyone should go buy real estate now. The OP sounds like a worried home owner, and I just pointed out that if someone is really worried about inflation – well real estate is a traditional inflation hedge. It has worked really well in that capacity for thousands of years.
For me and my unique situation, buying last year made sense, and still does. The ability to open a decent size dollar short position with no carrying costs is just great. The house is cool, and is a long term luxury. I don’t much care what valuation does over the next 15 years. My son will inherit our beach house some day, it will likely never be sold.
I am not following your ideas on “non-productive” investment. Are there thousands upon thousands of empty homes somewhere? For the few (in percentage terms) that are empty, will not a growing population soak that up pretty quick? If not, don’t we need a ton of new construction every year just to replace old homes that are torn down or converted to coffee shops or whatever? And since homes are long lived assets, even if a few extra were built the last three years won’t they eventually find a good use? I mean really, its not like we just built 1 million homes that will be empty, never-lived-in and rotting away 5 years from now, right? New home supply may have gotten ahead of its self a little, but, IMHO it is nothing like the valuation overhang we have.
March 22, 2008 at 7:11 PM in reply to: What am I missing? Is that a train coming at me or am I Chicken Little? #175195jonnycsdParticipantDWCAP – I was not suggesting that anyone should go buy real estate now. The OP sounds like a worried home owner, and I just pointed out that if someone is really worried about inflation – well real estate is a traditional inflation hedge. It has worked really well in that capacity for thousands of years.
For me and my unique situation, buying last year made sense, and still does. The ability to open a decent size dollar short position with no carrying costs is just great. The house is cool, and is a long term luxury. I don’t much care what valuation does over the next 15 years. My son will inherit our beach house some day, it will likely never be sold.
I am not following your ideas on “non-productive” investment. Are there thousands upon thousands of empty homes somewhere? For the few (in percentage terms) that are empty, will not a growing population soak that up pretty quick? If not, don’t we need a ton of new construction every year just to replace old homes that are torn down or converted to coffee shops or whatever? And since homes are long lived assets, even if a few extra were built the last three years won’t they eventually find a good use? I mean really, its not like we just built 1 million homes that will be empty, never-lived-in and rotting away 5 years from now, right? New home supply may have gotten ahead of its self a little, but, IMHO it is nothing like the valuation overhang we have.
March 22, 2008 at 7:11 PM in reply to: What am I missing? Is that a train coming at me or am I Chicken Little? #175202jonnycsdParticipantDWCAP – I was not suggesting that anyone should go buy real estate now. The OP sounds like a worried home owner, and I just pointed out that if someone is really worried about inflation – well real estate is a traditional inflation hedge. It has worked really well in that capacity for thousands of years.
For me and my unique situation, buying last year made sense, and still does. The ability to open a decent size dollar short position with no carrying costs is just great. The house is cool, and is a long term luxury. I don’t much care what valuation does over the next 15 years. My son will inherit our beach house some day, it will likely never be sold.
I am not following your ideas on “non-productive” investment. Are there thousands upon thousands of empty homes somewhere? For the few (in percentage terms) that are empty, will not a growing population soak that up pretty quick? If not, don’t we need a ton of new construction every year just to replace old homes that are torn down or converted to coffee shops or whatever? And since homes are long lived assets, even if a few extra were built the last three years won’t they eventually find a good use? I mean really, its not like we just built 1 million homes that will be empty, never-lived-in and rotting away 5 years from now, right? New home supply may have gotten ahead of its self a little, but, IMHO it is nothing like the valuation overhang we have.
-
AuthorPosts