[jonnycsd]

ACTUAL TEXT OF IL SB99

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=&SessionId=3&GA=93&DocTypeId=SB&DocNum=99&GAID=3&LegID=734&SpecSess=&Session

Each class or course in comprehensive sex education offered in any of grades K through 12 shall include instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, including the prevention, transmission and spread of HIV AIDS.

Cleary McCains advert is accurate; the bill calls for Sex Ed for grade K and up and requires “safe sex” discussions with 5 year olds. This is not a “candy-from-strangers” piece of legislation.

I agree that keeping kids informed is a good thing, but there is a time and place for it. I do not want Big Brother Obama dictating the timing and content of that information. That is my conversation to have with my kids when I determine they are ready. Only the most arrogant politician with deep facist tendencies would think it appropriate to take decisions like these away from parents.

This guy is not going to change anything – he is a relentless careerist, and really just another big-government Democrat who is determined to intrude in your life, take your paycheck and redistribute it to the special interest voter groups who back him.

[jonnycsd]

The only problem with this outcome is that we should have sold them $2 trillion worth.

[jonnycsd]

The only problem with this outcome is that we should have sold them $2 trillion worth.

[jonnycsd]

The only problem with this outcome is that we should have sold them $2 trillion worth.

[jonnycsd]

The only problem with this outcome is that we should have sold them $2 trillion worth.

[jonnycsd]

The only problem with this outcome is that we should have sold them $2 trillion worth.

[jonnycsd]

Bubba99 says:

more regulation is put in to detour the very greedy from taking everything

Perhaps true to some extent, however regulation better serves the purpose of maintaining the status quo, which benefits the incumbent wealthy while providing barriers to aspiring up and commers. This is certainly the way regulation is used in Brazil and other Latin American nations.

In my opinion, it is better to have a dynamic system, where those who are good stewards of the nations wealth get more to manage, and those who are lazy or irresponsible stewards of wealth are stripped of it by market force.

By the way, exactly what “new creative financial products” would you like to see expunged?

[jonnycsd]

Bubba99 says:

more regulation is put in to detour the very greedy from taking everything

Perhaps true to some extent, however regulation better serves the purpose of maintaining the status quo, which benefits the incumbent wealthy while providing barriers to aspiring up and commers. This is certainly the way regulation is used in Brazil and other Latin American nations.

In my opinion, it is better to have a dynamic system, where those who are good stewards of the nations wealth get more to manage, and those who are lazy or irresponsible stewards of wealth are stripped of it by market force.

By the way, exactly what “new creative financial products” would you like to see expunged?

[jonnycsd]

Bubba99 says:

more regulation is put in to detour the very greedy from taking everything

Perhaps true to some extent, however regulation better serves the purpose of maintaining the status quo, which benefits the incumbent wealthy while providing barriers to aspiring up and commers. This is certainly the way regulation is used in Brazil and other Latin American nations.

In my opinion, it is better to have a dynamic system, where those who are good stewards of the nations wealth get more to manage, and those who are lazy or irresponsible stewards of wealth are stripped of it by market force.

By the way, exactly what “new creative financial products” would you like to see expunged?

[jonnycsd]

Bubba99 says:

more regulation is put in to detour the very greedy from taking everything

Perhaps true to some extent, however regulation better serves the purpose of maintaining the status quo, which benefits the incumbent wealthy while providing barriers to aspiring up and commers. This is certainly the way regulation is used in Brazil and other Latin American nations.

In my opinion, it is better to have a dynamic system, where those who are good stewards of the nations wealth get more to manage, and those who are lazy or irresponsible stewards of wealth are stripped of it by market force.

By the way, exactly what “new creative financial products” would you like to see expunged?

[jonnycsd]

Bubba99 says:

more regulation is put in to detour the very greedy from taking everything

Perhaps true to some extent, however regulation better serves the purpose of maintaining the status quo, which benefits the incumbent wealthy while providing barriers to aspiring up and commers. This is certainly the way regulation is used in Brazil and other Latin American nations.

In my opinion, it is better to have a dynamic system, where those who are good stewards of the nations wealth get more to manage, and those who are lazy or irresponsible stewards of wealth are stripped of it by market force.

By the way, exactly what “new creative financial products” would you like to see expunged?

[jonnycsd]

The underlying trends that the OP calls out are there, but I do not agree with the implication that it is a planned conspiracy. Extrapolate US demographic trends about 30 years and the USA will look like Brazil. Vast underclasses of uneducated poor, a small middle class that manages things, and a ruling elite that stays in power through generations, with the occasional “union” candidate who “shakes things up” before being co-opted into the system. When politics is about many different groups competing for a bigger slice of the pie rather than governing the nation that is what will happen (clientelismo is what its called in Latin America). The only way to stop it is to discontinue the Federal Government’s role as a redistributor of wealth – end transfer payments.

[jonnycsd]

The underlying trends that the OP calls out are there, but I do not agree with the implication that it is a planned conspiracy. Extrapolate US demographic trends about 30 years and the USA will look like Brazil. Vast underclasses of uneducated poor, a small middle class that manages things, and a ruling elite that stays in power through generations, with the occasional “union” candidate who “shakes things up” before being co-opted into the system. When politics is about many different groups competing for a bigger slice of the pie rather than governing the nation that is what will happen (clientelismo is what its called in Latin America). The only way to stop it is to discontinue the Federal Government’s role as a redistributor of wealth – end transfer payments.

[jonnycsd]

The underlying trends that the OP calls out are there, but I do not agree with the implication that it is a planned conspiracy. Extrapolate US demographic trends about 30 years and the USA will look like Brazil. Vast underclasses of uneducated poor, a small middle class that manages things, and a ruling elite that stays in power through generations, with the occasional “union” candidate who “shakes things up” before being co-opted into the system. When politics is about many different groups competing for a bigger slice of the pie rather than governing the nation that is what will happen (clientelismo is what its called in Latin America). The only way to stop it is to discontinue the Federal Government’s role as a redistributor of wealth – end transfer payments.

[jonnycsd]

The underlying trends that the OP calls out are there, but I do not agree with the implication that it is a planned conspiracy. Extrapolate US demographic trends about 30 years and the USA will look like Brazil. Vast underclasses of uneducated poor, a small middle class that manages things, and a ruling elite that stays in power through generations, with the occasional “union” candidate who “shakes things up” before being co-opted into the system. When politics is about many different groups competing for a bigger slice of the pie rather than governing the nation that is what will happen (clientelismo is what its called in Latin America). The only way to stop it is to discontinue the Federal Government’s role as a redistributor of wealth – end transfer payments.

[Author]

Posts