Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
jficquette
ParticipantIllegals do vote. Go crawl back into your hole until you sober up.
http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/news/abox/article_1330827.php
“focused primarily on the assumption that most recipients are U.S. citizens legally registered to vote.
But it is not a fail-safe assumption. In 1996, some 743 non-citizens were found to have voted in the controversial congressional race in which Loretta Sanchez upset Bob Dornan – the same seat for which Sanchez and Nguyen are now vying. Since then, only a few safeguards have been put in place to prevent non-citizens from registering and voting”.http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersd70b
“The United States sends election monitors around the world to help discourage fraudulent elections. But, here at home, it has largely turned a blind eye to the possibility that fraudulent voting by noncitizens could determine an election outcome.
Not only is our voter registration system easily accessible to abuse by noncitizens, illegal aliens, by being included in the apportionment of congressional seats, are automatically given a role in determining the outcome of elections across the country, including the vote in the Electoral College that decides the Presidency”.
John
ParticipantIllegals do vote. Go crawl back into your hole until you sober up.
http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/news/abox/article_1330827.php
“focused primarily on the assumption that most recipients are U.S. citizens legally registered to vote.
But it is not a fail-safe assumption. In 1996, some 743 non-citizens were found to have voted in the controversial congressional race in which Loretta Sanchez upset Bob Dornan – the same seat for which Sanchez and Nguyen are now vying. Since then, only a few safeguards have been put in place to prevent non-citizens from registering and voting”.http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersd70b
“The United States sends election monitors around the world to help discourage fraudulent elections. But, here at home, it has largely turned a blind eye to the possibility that fraudulent voting by noncitizens could determine an election outcome.
Not only is our voter registration system easily accessible to abuse by noncitizens, illegal aliens, by being included in the apportionment of congressional seats, are automatically given a role in determining the outcome of elections across the country, including the vote in the Electoral College that decides the Presidency”.
John
ParticipantIllegals do vote. Go crawl back into your hole until you sober up.
http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/news/abox/article_1330827.php
“focused primarily on the assumption that most recipients are U.S. citizens legally registered to vote.
But it is not a fail-safe assumption. In 1996, some 743 non-citizens were found to have voted in the controversial congressional race in which Loretta Sanchez upset Bob Dornan – the same seat for which Sanchez and Nguyen are now vying. Since then, only a few safeguards have been put in place to prevent non-citizens from registering and voting”.http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersd70b
“The United States sends election monitors around the world to help discourage fraudulent elections. But, here at home, it has largely turned a blind eye to the possibility that fraudulent voting by noncitizens could determine an election outcome.
Not only is our voter registration system easily accessible to abuse by noncitizens, illegal aliens, by being included in the apportionment of congressional seats, are automatically given a role in determining the outcome of elections across the country, including the vote in the Electoral College that decides the Presidency”.
John
ParticipantMan, I remember the RTC days. I was living in Atlanta then and employed as a headhunting placing accountants for a national firm. This was before I started a company doing it.
We tried to get into the RTC to put temps in but it was such a craxy place that we never made much progress. We were able to only do a little business with them.
I would guess that the people who bought those properties back then ended up making a fortune on it. The RTC office was in my office building and they had an entire room filled with brochures and pictures of properties up for sale. They had brand new 20-30 story office buildings included. No telling how cheap they went.
This mess now is so deep and complicated no one really knows how its going to turn out. I read the other day that Bernanke called in some “experts” to give him a face to face refresher course on exactly how these derivatives function. That is pretty scary to think that a smart guy like him doesn’t fully understand them. The problem is the off balance sheet stuff that no one even knows about.
I think that Bush’s plan is best. Just like the chips fall where they may for those who were speculating in the market and for the wall street firms who created the mess but do whatever neccessary to try to minimize the impact to the banking system.
Like it or not if the banks go under we go under.
John
ParticipantMan, I remember the RTC days. I was living in Atlanta then and employed as a headhunting placing accountants for a national firm. This was before I started a company doing it.
We tried to get into the RTC to put temps in but it was such a craxy place that we never made much progress. We were able to only do a little business with them.
I would guess that the people who bought those properties back then ended up making a fortune on it. The RTC office was in my office building and they had an entire room filled with brochures and pictures of properties up for sale. They had brand new 20-30 story office buildings included. No telling how cheap they went.
This mess now is so deep and complicated no one really knows how its going to turn out. I read the other day that Bernanke called in some “experts” to give him a face to face refresher course on exactly how these derivatives function. That is pretty scary to think that a smart guy like him doesn’t fully understand them. The problem is the off balance sheet stuff that no one even knows about.
I think that Bush’s plan is best. Just like the chips fall where they may for those who were speculating in the market and for the wall street firms who created the mess but do whatever neccessary to try to minimize the impact to the banking system.
Like it or not if the banks go under we go under.
John
ParticipantMan, I remember the RTC days. I was living in Atlanta then and employed as a headhunting placing accountants for a national firm. This was before I started a company doing it.
We tried to get into the RTC to put temps in but it was such a craxy place that we never made much progress. We were able to only do a little business with them.
I would guess that the people who bought those properties back then ended up making a fortune on it. The RTC office was in my office building and they had an entire room filled with brochures and pictures of properties up for sale. They had brand new 20-30 story office buildings included. No telling how cheap they went.
This mess now is so deep and complicated no one really knows how its going to turn out. I read the other day that Bernanke called in some “experts” to give him a face to face refresher course on exactly how these derivatives function. That is pretty scary to think that a smart guy like him doesn’t fully understand them. The problem is the off balance sheet stuff that no one even knows about.
I think that Bush’s plan is best. Just like the chips fall where they may for those who were speculating in the market and for the wall street firms who created the mess but do whatever neccessary to try to minimize the impact to the banking system.
Like it or not if the banks go under we go under.
John
ParticipantMan, I remember the RTC days. I was living in Atlanta then and employed as a headhunting placing accountants for a national firm. This was before I started a company doing it.
We tried to get into the RTC to put temps in but it was such a craxy place that we never made much progress. We were able to only do a little business with them.
I would guess that the people who bought those properties back then ended up making a fortune on it. The RTC office was in my office building and they had an entire room filled with brochures and pictures of properties up for sale. They had brand new 20-30 story office buildings included. No telling how cheap they went.
This mess now is so deep and complicated no one really knows how its going to turn out. I read the other day that Bernanke called in some “experts” to give him a face to face refresher course on exactly how these derivatives function. That is pretty scary to think that a smart guy like him doesn’t fully understand them. The problem is the off balance sheet stuff that no one even knows about.
I think that Bush’s plan is best. Just like the chips fall where they may for those who were speculating in the market and for the wall street firms who created the mess but do whatever neccessary to try to minimize the impact to the banking system.
Like it or not if the banks go under we go under.
John
ParticipantMan, I remember the RTC days. I was living in Atlanta then and employed as a headhunting placing accountants for a national firm. This was before I started a company doing it.
We tried to get into the RTC to put temps in but it was such a craxy place that we never made much progress. We were able to only do a little business with them.
I would guess that the people who bought those properties back then ended up making a fortune on it. The RTC office was in my office building and they had an entire room filled with brochures and pictures of properties up for sale. They had brand new 20-30 story office buildings included. No telling how cheap they went.
This mess now is so deep and complicated no one really knows how its going to turn out. I read the other day that Bernanke called in some “experts” to give him a face to face refresher course on exactly how these derivatives function. That is pretty scary to think that a smart guy like him doesn’t fully understand them. The problem is the off balance sheet stuff that no one even knows about.
I think that Bush’s plan is best. Just like the chips fall where they may for those who were speculating in the market and for the wall street firms who created the mess but do whatever neccessary to try to minimize the impact to the banking system.
Like it or not if the banks go under we go under.
John
ParticipantWhy do you think Bush has any buddies on Wall Street? He was the Texas Governor before he ran for President and before that he ran the Texas Rangers.
I hate banks too but this article will explain that we have no choice but to do what we can to make sure the financial industry remains intact.
Most people have no idea what this could turn into.
John
PS I am a Libertarian. If left up to me we would get rid of the entire federal government except that pertaining to defense, the criminal system and maybe a few other things. Let the states handle it everything else which is the eay it was intended. We are not called the United States of America without a good reason. If California wants pot sold on the corner then great, if they want gays to get married, great etc
ParticipantWhy do you think Bush has any buddies on Wall Street? He was the Texas Governor before he ran for President and before that he ran the Texas Rangers.
I hate banks too but this article will explain that we have no choice but to do what we can to make sure the financial industry remains intact.
Most people have no idea what this could turn into.
John
PS I am a Libertarian. If left up to me we would get rid of the entire federal government except that pertaining to defense, the criminal system and maybe a few other things. Let the states handle it everything else which is the eay it was intended. We are not called the United States of America without a good reason. If California wants pot sold on the corner then great, if they want gays to get married, great etc
ParticipantWhy do you think Bush has any buddies on Wall Street? He was the Texas Governor before he ran for President and before that he ran the Texas Rangers.
I hate banks too but this article will explain that we have no choice but to do what we can to make sure the financial industry remains intact.
Most people have no idea what this could turn into.
John
PS I am a Libertarian. If left up to me we would get rid of the entire federal government except that pertaining to defense, the criminal system and maybe a few other things. Let the states handle it everything else which is the eay it was intended. We are not called the United States of America without a good reason. If California wants pot sold on the corner then great, if they want gays to get married, great etc
ParticipantWhy do you think Bush has any buddies on Wall Street? He was the Texas Governor before he ran for President and before that he ran the Texas Rangers.
I hate banks too but this article will explain that we have no choice but to do what we can to make sure the financial industry remains intact.
Most people have no idea what this could turn into.
John
PS I am a Libertarian. If left up to me we would get rid of the entire federal government except that pertaining to defense, the criminal system and maybe a few other things. Let the states handle it everything else which is the eay it was intended. We are not called the United States of America without a good reason. If California wants pot sold on the corner then great, if they want gays to get married, great etc
ParticipantWhy do you think Bush has any buddies on Wall Street? He was the Texas Governor before he ran for President and before that he ran the Texas Rangers.
I hate banks too but this article will explain that we have no choice but to do what we can to make sure the financial industry remains intact.
Most people have no idea what this could turn into.
John
PS I am a Libertarian. If left up to me we would get rid of the entire federal government except that pertaining to defense, the criminal system and maybe a few other things. Let the states handle it everything else which is the eay it was intended. We are not called the United States of America without a good reason. If California wants pot sold on the corner then great, if they want gays to get married, great etc
ParticipantI am 53 now and too old but I didn’t earlier because I didn’t want to serve the country that way.
Are you in the military?
John
-
AuthorPosts
