Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #237084July 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #237215
jficquette
Participant[quote=surveyor]
Sharpton, ok. But, back up your statements about Jackson. What has he said/preached that makes you think he advocates victimization of blacks, particularly black males. I don’t see that, Allan.I don’t know about you, Allan, I hear that a lot from a large segment of our progressive commentators here…
Let’s also not forget that Jesse Jackson has had a few extra marital affairs, at least one resulting in a child. So his silence on personal responsibilities when it comes to black fathers and black children is especially deafening.
[/quote]
I think the “talking down to Black folks” comment by Jackson was him suggesting that Obama is acting too “White”.
Cutting out the Nuts part was I think him saying tha he wish he could put a stop to his campaign.
July 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #237224Participant[quote=surveyor]
Sharpton, ok. But, back up your statements about Jackson. What has he said/preached that makes you think he advocates victimization of blacks, particularly black males. I don’t see that, Allan.I don’t know about you, Allan, I hear that a lot from a large segment of our progressive commentators here…
Let’s also not forget that Jesse Jackson has had a few extra marital affairs, at least one resulting in a child. So his silence on personal responsibilities when it comes to black fathers and black children is especially deafening.
[/quote]
I think the “talking down to Black folks” comment by Jackson was him suggesting that Obama is acting too “White”.
Cutting out the Nuts part was I think him saying tha he wish he could put a stop to his campaign.
July 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #237269Participant[quote=surveyor]
Sharpton, ok. But, back up your statements about Jackson. What has he said/preached that makes you think he advocates victimization of blacks, particularly black males. I don’t see that, Allan.I don’t know about you, Allan, I hear that a lot from a large segment of our progressive commentators here…
Let’s also not forget that Jesse Jackson has had a few extra marital affairs, at least one resulting in a child. So his silence on personal responsibilities when it comes to black fathers and black children is especially deafening.
[/quote]
I think the “talking down to Black folks” comment by Jackson was him suggesting that Obama is acting too “White”.
Cutting out the Nuts part was I think him saying tha he wish he could put a stop to his campaign.
July 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM in reply to: McCain should win in landslide. Obama turning out to be a lightweight. #237283Participant[quote=surveyor]
Sharpton, ok. But, back up your statements about Jackson. What has he said/preached that makes you think he advocates victimization of blacks, particularly black males. I don’t see that, Allan.I don’t know about you, Allan, I hear that a lot from a large segment of our progressive commentators here…
Let’s also not forget that Jesse Jackson has had a few extra marital affairs, at least one resulting in a child. So his silence on personal responsibilities when it comes to black fathers and black children is especially deafening.
[/quote]
I think the “talking down to Black folks” comment by Jackson was him suggesting that Obama is acting too “White”.
Cutting out the Nuts part was I think him saying tha he wish he could put a stop to his campaign.
July 9, 2008 at 4:47 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #236314Participant[quote=Wickedheart]I think you are projecting, jficquette.
[/quote]
LOL
July 9, 2008 at 4:47 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #236441Participant[quote=Wickedheart]I think you are projecting, jficquette.
[/quote]
LOL
July 9, 2008 at 4:47 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #236451Participant[quote=Wickedheart]I think you are projecting, jficquette.
[/quote]
LOL
July 9, 2008 at 4:47 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #236497Participant[quote=Wickedheart]I think you are projecting, jficquette.
[/quote]
LOL
July 9, 2008 at 4:47 PM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #236510Participant[quote=Wickedheart]I think you are projecting, jficquette.
[/quote]
LOL
July 9, 2008 at 9:54 AM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #235910ParticipantI think Obama likes boys.
John
July 9, 2008 at 9:54 AM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #236036ParticipantI think Obama likes boys.
John
July 9, 2008 at 9:54 AM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #236047ParticipantI think Obama likes boys.
John
July 9, 2008 at 9:54 AM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #236092ParticipantI think Obama likes boys.
John
July 9, 2008 at 9:54 AM in reply to: Shouldn’t we know the sexual turn-ons of the candidates? #236104ParticipantI think Obama likes boys.
John
-
AuthorPosts
