Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 27, 2010 at 8:27 PM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #609869September 27, 2010 at 8:27 PM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #609955
jficquette
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]I agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.[/quote]
Cutting spending is better because we have to get it under control. Once it’s under control then you can cut taxes.
September 27, 2010 at 8:27 PM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610503jficquette
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]I agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.[/quote]
Cutting spending is better because we have to get it under control. Once it’s under control then you can cut taxes.
September 27, 2010 at 8:27 PM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610616jficquette
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]I agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.[/quote]
Cutting spending is better because we have to get it under control. Once it’s under control then you can cut taxes.
September 27, 2010 at 8:27 PM in reply to: Greenspan – Very Dangerous Possibilities of Extending Bush Tax Cuts #610930jficquette
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]I agree – it is a decision between “terrible and catistrophic” though I’m not sure which is which.
I also agree that the spending side is the side to focus on. Ideally, spending would be cut enough that we could keep the tax credits in place AND stop borrowing. One can dream.
I’m not sure why Greenspan says we need to cut spending instead of taxes. It should really be the same thing, but since we are borrowing so much, I guess he is saying we should stop borrowing and raise taxes.
This is not screaming “bull housing market” to me.[/quote]
Cutting spending is better because we have to get it under control. Once it’s under control then you can cut taxes.
jficquette
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Closing the polls at noon would ensure certain defeat of this bill.[/quote]
Bunch of people will probably forget to go anyway.
jficquette
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Closing the polls at noon would ensure certain defeat of this bill.[/quote]
Bunch of people will probably forget to go anyway.
jficquette
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Closing the polls at noon would ensure certain defeat of this bill.[/quote]
Bunch of people will probably forget to go anyway.
jficquette
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Closing the polls at noon would ensure certain defeat of this bill.[/quote]
Bunch of people will probably forget to go anyway.
jficquette
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Closing the polls at noon would ensure certain defeat of this bill.[/quote]
Bunch of people will probably forget to go anyway.
September 24, 2010 at 3:56 PM in reply to: OT: Chase sucks………………….fees fees fees fees fees fees #609030jficquette
Participant[quote=flu][quote=jficquette][quote=flu]Ok. I just
John[/quote]Not true. I just got one yesterday out of my brokerage account. However, you need to call in advance in the morning, and usually pick up in the afternoon or the next day…Also, cashier checks are free. They do not do certified checks though. If you don’t know the difference, it shouldn’t make a difference.[/quote]
Thanks, that is a new information for me. I haven’t tried in several years to get a money order.
Thanks,
John
September 24, 2010 at 3:56 PM in reply to: OT: Chase sucks………………….fees fees fees fees fees fees #609116jficquette
Participant[quote=flu][quote=jficquette][quote=flu]Ok. I just
John[/quote]Not true. I just got one yesterday out of my brokerage account. However, you need to call in advance in the morning, and usually pick up in the afternoon or the next day…Also, cashier checks are free. They do not do certified checks though. If you don’t know the difference, it shouldn’t make a difference.[/quote]
Thanks, that is a new information for me. I haven’t tried in several years to get a money order.
Thanks,
John
September 24, 2010 at 3:56 PM in reply to: OT: Chase sucks………………….fees fees fees fees fees fees #609672jficquette
Participant[quote=flu][quote=jficquette][quote=flu]Ok. I just
John[/quote]Not true. I just got one yesterday out of my brokerage account. However, you need to call in advance in the morning, and usually pick up in the afternoon or the next day…Also, cashier checks are free. They do not do certified checks though. If you don’t know the difference, it shouldn’t make a difference.[/quote]
Thanks, that is a new information for me. I haven’t tried in several years to get a money order.
Thanks,
John
September 24, 2010 at 3:56 PM in reply to: OT: Chase sucks………………….fees fees fees fees fees fees #609782jficquette
Participant[quote=flu][quote=jficquette][quote=flu]Ok. I just
John[/quote]Not true. I just got one yesterday out of my brokerage account. However, you need to call in advance in the morning, and usually pick up in the afternoon or the next day…Also, cashier checks are free. They do not do certified checks though. If you don’t know the difference, it shouldn’t make a difference.[/quote]
Thanks, that is a new information for me. I haven’t tried in several years to get a money order.
Thanks,
John
September 24, 2010 at 3:56 PM in reply to: OT: Chase sucks………………….fees fees fees fees fees fees #610101jficquette
Participant[quote=flu][quote=jficquette][quote=flu]Ok. I just
John[/quote]Not true. I just got one yesterday out of my brokerage account. However, you need to call in advance in the morning, and usually pick up in the afternoon or the next day…Also, cashier checks are free. They do not do certified checks though. If you don’t know the difference, it shouldn’t make a difference.[/quote]
Thanks, that is a new information for me. I haven’t tried in several years to get a money order.
Thanks,
John
-
AuthorPosts
