Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
jficquette
Participant[quote=arraya]”Try evolving an eye”
The age old “Irreducible complexity” argument. If a particular person cannot imagine a way in which the eye evolved, this does not have any bearing upon whether or not the eye actually did evolve.
Next time you are working on a tough computer problem and can’t explain something. Just say it is God and give up.
[/quote]
Better yet, throw a bunch of computer components in a box, let sit for 1 million years and you will still have a bunch of components sitting in a box.
Yall get hung up on semantics. What we call God is actually the process of intelligent design. To think things just happened is pretty stupid when you think about it.
God has no personality and is not an entity. Its the self organizing force behind the constant changes in the universe.
John
Participant[quote=arraya]”Try evolving an eye”
The age old “Irreducible complexity” argument. If a particular person cannot imagine a way in which the eye evolved, this does not have any bearing upon whether or not the eye actually did evolve.
Next time you are working on a tough computer problem and can’t explain something. Just say it is God and give up.
[/quote]
Better yet, throw a bunch of computer components in a box, let sit for 1 million years and you will still have a bunch of components sitting in a box.
Yall get hung up on semantics. What we call God is actually the process of intelligent design. To think things just happened is pretty stupid when you think about it.
God has no personality and is not an entity. Its the self organizing force behind the constant changes in the universe.
John
Participant[quote=arraya]”Try evolving an eye”
The age old “Irreducible complexity” argument. If a particular person cannot imagine a way in which the eye evolved, this does not have any bearing upon whether or not the eye actually did evolve.
Next time you are working on a tough computer problem and can’t explain something. Just say it is God and give up.
[/quote]
Better yet, throw a bunch of computer components in a box, let sit for 1 million years and you will still have a bunch of components sitting in a box.
Yall get hung up on semantics. What we call God is actually the process of intelligent design. To think things just happened is pretty stupid when you think about it.
God has no personality and is not an entity. Its the self organizing force behind the constant changes in the universe.
John
Participant[quote=arraya]”Try evolving an eye”
The age old “Irreducible complexity” argument. If a particular person cannot imagine a way in which the eye evolved, this does not have any bearing upon whether or not the eye actually did evolve.
Next time you are working on a tough computer problem and can’t explain something. Just say it is God and give up.
[/quote]
Better yet, throw a bunch of computer components in a box, let sit for 1 million years and you will still have a bunch of components sitting in a box.
Yall get hung up on semantics. What we call God is actually the process of intelligent design. To think things just happened is pretty stupid when you think about it.
God has no personality and is not an entity. Its the self organizing force behind the constant changes in the universe.
John
Participant[quote=LuckyInOC][quote=Mark Holmes][quote=flinger]Clearly, esmith and Mark Holmes are white people:
#75 Threatening to Move to Canada[/quote]
Hilarious. And yes, I am white… and wouldn’t really move to Canada. I love the US too much, and it’s too ingrained in my identity, having descended from pre-Civil War Irish-English stock, but you get my point. I’m tired of semi-literate bible-thumpers running the country into the ground.[/quote]
Those bible-thumpers aren’t running California, then how do you explain California?
If Obama wins it would be California gone national…
Lucky In OC[/quote]
I agree! All you have to do is look at California to see what socialism does to an economy.
John
Participant[quote=LuckyInOC][quote=Mark Holmes][quote=flinger]Clearly, esmith and Mark Holmes are white people:
#75 Threatening to Move to Canada[/quote]
Hilarious. And yes, I am white… and wouldn’t really move to Canada. I love the US too much, and it’s too ingrained in my identity, having descended from pre-Civil War Irish-English stock, but you get my point. I’m tired of semi-literate bible-thumpers running the country into the ground.[/quote]
Those bible-thumpers aren’t running California, then how do you explain California?
If Obama wins it would be California gone national…
Lucky In OC[/quote]
I agree! All you have to do is look at California to see what socialism does to an economy.
John
Participant[quote=LuckyInOC][quote=Mark Holmes][quote=flinger]Clearly, esmith and Mark Holmes are white people:
#75 Threatening to Move to Canada[/quote]
Hilarious. And yes, I am white… and wouldn’t really move to Canada. I love the US too much, and it’s too ingrained in my identity, having descended from pre-Civil War Irish-English stock, but you get my point. I’m tired of semi-literate bible-thumpers running the country into the ground.[/quote]
Those bible-thumpers aren’t running California, then how do you explain California?
If Obama wins it would be California gone national…
Lucky In OC[/quote]
I agree! All you have to do is look at California to see what socialism does to an economy.
John
Participant[quote=LuckyInOC][quote=Mark Holmes][quote=flinger]Clearly, esmith and Mark Holmes are white people:
#75 Threatening to Move to Canada[/quote]
Hilarious. And yes, I am white… and wouldn’t really move to Canada. I love the US too much, and it’s too ingrained in my identity, having descended from pre-Civil War Irish-English stock, but you get my point. I’m tired of semi-literate bible-thumpers running the country into the ground.[/quote]
Those bible-thumpers aren’t running California, then how do you explain California?
If Obama wins it would be California gone national…
Lucky In OC[/quote]
I agree! All you have to do is look at California to see what socialism does to an economy.
John
Participant[quote=LuckyInOC][quote=Mark Holmes][quote=flinger]Clearly, esmith and Mark Holmes are white people:
#75 Threatening to Move to Canada[/quote]
Hilarious. And yes, I am white… and wouldn’t really move to Canada. I love the US too much, and it’s too ingrained in my identity, having descended from pre-Civil War Irish-English stock, but you get my point. I’m tired of semi-literate bible-thumpers running the country into the ground.[/quote]
Those bible-thumpers aren’t running California, then how do you explain California?
If Obama wins it would be California gone national…
Lucky In OC[/quote]
I agree! All you have to do is look at California to see what socialism does to an economy.
John
Participant[quote=Aecetia]John,
Which goober are you considering O’Reilly to be? There are at least 3 definitions in the urban dictionary for him. He may be a goober, but he is an independent goober. Did you see his interview with Obama?[/quote]
Hi Aecetia,
No, I didn’t watch the interview. I quite watching O’Reilly back when he got busted for those preverted phone calls he made and after he had that interview with Kerry where he treated him with kid gloves.
If you saw the interview, what did you think of it???
Aecetia, I went through the urban dictionary and didn’t really see any good goober fits. Maybe I am the goober(g).
John
Participant[quote=Aecetia]John,
Which goober are you considering O’Reilly to be? There are at least 3 definitions in the urban dictionary for him. He may be a goober, but he is an independent goober. Did you see his interview with Obama?[/quote]
Hi Aecetia,
No, I didn’t watch the interview. I quite watching O’Reilly back when he got busted for those preverted phone calls he made and after he had that interview with Kerry where he treated him with kid gloves.
If you saw the interview, what did you think of it???
Aecetia, I went through the urban dictionary and didn’t really see any good goober fits. Maybe I am the goober(g).
John
Participant[quote=Aecetia]John,
Which goober are you considering O’Reilly to be? There are at least 3 definitions in the urban dictionary for him. He may be a goober, but he is an independent goober. Did you see his interview with Obama?[/quote]
Hi Aecetia,
No, I didn’t watch the interview. I quite watching O’Reilly back when he got busted for those preverted phone calls he made and after he had that interview with Kerry where he treated him with kid gloves.
If you saw the interview, what did you think of it???
Aecetia, I went through the urban dictionary and didn’t really see any good goober fits. Maybe I am the goober(g).
John
Participant[quote=Aecetia]John,
Which goober are you considering O’Reilly to be? There are at least 3 definitions in the urban dictionary for him. He may be a goober, but he is an independent goober. Did you see his interview with Obama?[/quote]
Hi Aecetia,
No, I didn’t watch the interview. I quite watching O’Reilly back when he got busted for those preverted phone calls he made and after he had that interview with Kerry where he treated him with kid gloves.
If you saw the interview, what did you think of it???
Aecetia, I went through the urban dictionary and didn’t really see any good goober fits. Maybe I am the goober(g).
John
Participant[quote=Aecetia]John,
Which goober are you considering O’Reilly to be? There are at least 3 definitions in the urban dictionary for him. He may be a goober, but he is an independent goober. Did you see his interview with Obama?[/quote]
Hi Aecetia,
No, I didn’t watch the interview. I quite watching O’Reilly back when he got busted for those preverted phone calls he made and after he had that interview with Kerry where he treated him with kid gloves.
If you saw the interview, what did you think of it???
Aecetia, I went through the urban dictionary and didn’t really see any good goober fits. Maybe I am the goober(g).
John
-
AuthorPosts
