[jficquette]

[quote=EconProf]Funny video!
Too bad its true for some firefighters.[/quote]

Friends next door neighbor is about to retire at 52. Makes well over $100k. Has worked the last 20 years at the airport. The airport firehouse is for one purpose only, and that is to put out fires when planes crash. They do not have responsibility off the airport property.

How many planes have crashed in SD in the last 25 years???

It’s likely the guy will draw basically full pay longer after retirement then he worked to “earn” it. So instead of making “just” $125k or so you have to double it. $250k for 20 something years of service?

[jficquette]

[quote=EconProf]Funny video!
Too bad its true for some firefighters.[/quote]

Friends next door neighbor is about to retire at 52. Makes well over $100k. Has worked the last 20 years at the airport. The airport firehouse is for one purpose only, and that is to put out fires when planes crash. They do not have responsibility off the airport property.

How many planes have crashed in SD in the last 25 years???

It’s likely the guy will draw basically full pay longer after retirement then he worked to “earn” it. So instead of making “just” $125k or so you have to double it. $250k for 20 something years of service?

[jficquette]

[quote=EconProf]Funny video!
Too bad its true for some firefighters.[/quote]

Friends next door neighbor is about to retire at 52. Makes well over $100k. Has worked the last 20 years at the airport. The airport firehouse is for one purpose only, and that is to put out fires when planes crash. They do not have responsibility off the airport property.

How many planes have crashed in SD in the last 25 years???

It’s likely the guy will draw basically full pay longer after retirement then he worked to “earn” it. So instead of making “just” $125k or so you have to double it. $250k for 20 something years of service?

[jficquette]

[quote=EconProf]Funny video!
Too bad its true for some firefighters.[/quote]

Friends next door neighbor is about to retire at 52. Makes well over $100k. Has worked the last 20 years at the airport. The airport firehouse is for one purpose only, and that is to put out fires when planes crash. They do not have responsibility off the airport property.

How many planes have crashed in SD in the last 25 years???

It’s likely the guy will draw basically full pay longer after retirement then he worked to “earn” it. So instead of making “just” $125k or so you have to double it. $250k for 20 something years of service?

[jficquette]

[quote=EconProf]Funny video!
Too bad its true for some firefighters.[/quote]

Friends next door neighbor is about to retire at 52. Makes well over $100k. Has worked the last 20 years at the airport. The airport firehouse is for one purpose only, and that is to put out fires when planes crash. They do not have responsibility off the airport property.

How many planes have crashed in SD in the last 25 years???

It’s likely the guy will draw basically full pay longer after retirement then he worked to “earn” it. So instead of making “just” $125k or so you have to double it. $250k for 20 something years of service?

[jficquette]

[quote=Aecetia]You get what you pay for. If you want to pay bargain basement wages, you will get marginally qualified employees. The less qualified, the more problems, and the more law suits for the municipalities who are for the most part self-insured.[/quote]

If we really wanted our money’s worth we would fire all them all and let private entities handle it.

[jficquette]

[quote=Aecetia]You get what you pay for. If you want to pay bargain basement wages, you will get marginally qualified employees. The less qualified, the more problems, and the more law suits for the municipalities who are for the most part self-insured.[/quote]

If we really wanted our money’s worth we would fire all them all and let private entities handle it.

[jficquette]

[quote=Aecetia]You get what you pay for. If you want to pay bargain basement wages, you will get marginally qualified employees. The less qualified, the more problems, and the more law suits for the municipalities who are for the most part self-insured.[/quote]

If we really wanted our money’s worth we would fire all them all and let private entities handle it.

[jficquette]

[quote=Aecetia]You get what you pay for. If you want to pay bargain basement wages, you will get marginally qualified employees. The less qualified, the more problems, and the more law suits for the municipalities who are for the most part self-insured.[/quote]

If we really wanted our money’s worth we would fire all them all and let private entities handle it.

[jficquette]

[quote=Aecetia]You get what you pay for. If you want to pay bargain basement wages, you will get marginally qualified employees. The less qualified, the more problems, and the more law suits for the municipalities who are for the most part self-insured.[/quote]

If we really wanted our money’s worth we would fire all them all and let private entities handle it.

[jficquette]

Here is an article that discusses it.

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2007/11/deutsche-bank-fc-problems-and-revenge.html

[jficquette]

Here is an article that discusses it.

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2007/11/deutsche-bank-fc-problems-and-revenge.html

[jficquette]

Here is an article that discusses it.

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2007/11/deutsche-bank-fc-problems-and-revenge.html

[jficquette]

Here is an article that discusses it.

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2007/11/deutsche-bank-fc-problems-and-revenge.html

[jficquette]

Here is an article that discusses it.

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2007/11/deutsche-bank-fc-problems-and-revenge.html

[Author]

Posts