[jameswenn]

The issue may be with the areas you’re looking at. There are still alot of high paying jobs in those areas, alot of folks that held out the past few years and have money saved up and don’t want to rent anymore.

Have you thought of looking at less desireable areas and sending the kids to private schools?

[jameswenn]

The issue may be with the areas you’re looking at. There are still alot of high paying jobs in those areas, alot of folks that held out the past few years and have money saved up and don’t want to rent anymore.

Have you thought of looking at less desireable areas and sending the kids to private schools?

[jameswenn]

The issue may be with the areas you’re looking at. There are still alot of high paying jobs in those areas, alot of folks that held out the past few years and have money saved up and don’t want to rent anymore.

Have you thought of looking at less desireable areas and sending the kids to private schools?

[jameswenn]

The issue may be with the areas you’re looking at. There are still alot of high paying jobs in those areas, alot of folks that held out the past few years and have money saved up and don’t want to rent anymore.

Have you thought of looking at less desireable areas and sending the kids to private schools?

[jameswenn]

The issue may be with the areas you’re looking at. There are still alot of high paying jobs in those areas, alot of folks that held out the past few years and have money saved up and don’t want to rent anymore.

Have you thought of looking at less desireable areas and sending the kids to private schools?

[jameswenn]

[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.

I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.

I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!

You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]

I don’t think either of you are wrong, but each 2nd mortgage holder handles things differently, depending on their objectives at the time.

[jameswenn]

[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.

I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.

I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!

You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]

I don’t think either of you are wrong, but each 2nd mortgage holder handles things differently, depending on their objectives at the time.

[jameswenn]

[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.

I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.

I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!

You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]

I don’t think either of you are wrong, but each 2nd mortgage holder handles things differently, depending on their objectives at the time.

[jameswenn]

[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.

I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.

I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!

You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]

I don’t think either of you are wrong, but each 2nd mortgage holder handles things differently, depending on their objectives at the time.

[jameswenn]

[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.

I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.

I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!

You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]

I don’t think either of you are wrong, but each 2nd mortgage holder handles things differently, depending on their objectives at the time.

[jameswenn]

Alot of companies are outsourcing and that doesn’t mean the work actually goes overseas. We have a floor in our building that once had cubes, but since the beginning of the year, rows of cubes were removed monthly and lined with 2×4 foot desks with workers from India. I have a feeling that a bunch of them live together, packed in houses.

The company we contract with charges 20 bucks an hour offshore, but they can bring the same person over here for 50 an hour, which is less than what we’d have to pay for an American. We must have 400 of them on that one floor, and i’m sure there are more scattered in other places too.

I don’t support it, but that’s how it is now.

[jameswenn]

Alot of companies are outsourcing and that doesn’t mean the work actually goes overseas. We have a floor in our building that once had cubes, but since the beginning of the year, rows of cubes were removed monthly and lined with 2×4 foot desks with workers from India. I have a feeling that a bunch of them live together, packed in houses.

The company we contract with charges 20 bucks an hour offshore, but they can bring the same person over here for 50 an hour, which is less than what we’d have to pay for an American. We must have 400 of them on that one floor, and i’m sure there are more scattered in other places too.

I don’t support it, but that’s how it is now.

[jameswenn]

Alot of companies are outsourcing and that doesn’t mean the work actually goes overseas. We have a floor in our building that once had cubes, but since the beginning of the year, rows of cubes were removed monthly and lined with 2×4 foot desks with workers from India. I have a feeling that a bunch of them live together, packed in houses.

The company we contract with charges 20 bucks an hour offshore, but they can bring the same person over here for 50 an hour, which is less than what we’d have to pay for an American. We must have 400 of them on that one floor, and i’m sure there are more scattered in other places too.

I don’t support it, but that’s how it is now.

[jameswenn]

Alot of companies are outsourcing and that doesn’t mean the work actually goes overseas. We have a floor in our building that once had cubes, but since the beginning of the year, rows of cubes were removed monthly and lined with 2×4 foot desks with workers from India. I have a feeling that a bunch of them live together, packed in houses.

The company we contract with charges 20 bucks an hour offshore, but they can bring the same person over here for 50 an hour, which is less than what we’d have to pay for an American. We must have 400 of them on that one floor, and i’m sure there are more scattered in other places too.

I don’t support it, but that’s how it is now.

[jameswenn]

Alot of companies are outsourcing and that doesn’t mean the work actually goes overseas. We have a floor in our building that once had cubes, but since the beginning of the year, rows of cubes were removed monthly and lined with 2×4 foot desks with workers from India. I have a feeling that a bunch of them live together, packed in houses.

The company we contract with charges 20 bucks an hour offshore, but they can bring the same person over here for 50 an hour, which is less than what we’d have to pay for an American. We must have 400 of them on that one floor, and i’m sure there are more scattered in other places too.

I don’t support it, but that’s how it is now.

[Author]

Posts