[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
I like your writing better than mine. When I blog, I concentrate on content rather than having it published. Which brings up this, what have you published that I might read more of your writing? What’s that? Not published?
[/quote]
There you go again, same stupid style of attack – achieves nothing. In fact it is almost ‘Jerry Springer’ like. Watch him much? I was giving you a suggestion that clarifies your content instead of copy/paste spewing. I didn’t do it to ‘slime’ someone (slime? rather juvenile way to use a noun as a verb). I make an effort to be clear and take the time to be clear.. and I do address content. So much so that I bother to quote just the section I am addressing as opposed to hitting the quickie ‘quote’ link and then spewing.

As for your statement ‘Can you not read?’, did you check what your quote looked like after you posted?
A
Single
Statement
per
line
gets
a
little
annoying
to
read

Which is why I mentioned the center quote box and why I bother to take the time to clean up the post and not keep nesting the quotes. I respect the viewer. Conciseness is important when addressing a topic.

This aspect of directly addressing the content instead of quoting in its entirety and then spewing is actually a sign of someone who may have published. It also tends to be the sign of someone who may have gone through the dissertation process.[/quote]
UC of degenerate: If this is what you call “not sliming” then I would hate to see what you call negative. (Is “sliming” a word? Please help me UC of degenerate. It passed my spellcheck tho. O no, another shortened word on a blog. Call the word police. Oh yea, UC of degenerate is here.)

I’m getting the weird feeling that ‘investor’ is currently taking classes. There is a 1.5 hours on/off to his board pubs. Tuesday classes @UCSD are 1.5 hours long. I also notice some weird timestamps on his postings. Looks like using different computers, possibly different types (Unix vs MSFT) with possible different time-bases. That said, UCSD computers tend to be well managed and sync’d up to a time-server. Maybe high school?

Maybe it is just the noise in the back of the room making it hard for me to concentrate ;-P

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
I like your writing better than mine. When I blog, I concentrate on content rather than having it published. Which brings up this, what have you published that I might read more of your writing? What’s that? Not published?
[/quote]
There you go again, same stupid style of attack – achieves nothing. In fact it is almost ‘Jerry Springer’ like. Watch him much? I was giving you a suggestion that clarifies your content instead of copy/paste spewing. I didn’t do it to ‘slime’ someone (slime? rather juvenile way to use a noun as a verb). I make an effort to be clear and take the time to be clear.. and I do address content. So much so that I bother to quote just the section I am addressing as opposed to hitting the quickie ‘quote’ link and then spewing.

As for your statement ‘Can you not read?’, did you check what your quote looked like after you posted?
A
Single
Statement
per
line
gets
a
little
annoying
to
read

Which is why I mentioned the center quote box and why I bother to take the time to clean up the post and not keep nesting the quotes. I respect the viewer. Conciseness is important when addressing a topic.

This aspect of directly addressing the content instead of quoting in its entirety and then spewing is actually a sign of someone who may have published. It also tends to be the sign of someone who may have gone through the dissertation process.[/quote]
UC of degenerate: If this is what you call “not sliming” then I would hate to see what you call negative. (Is “sliming” a word? Please help me UC of degenerate. It passed my spellcheck tho. O no, another shortened word on a blog. Call the word police. Oh yea, UC of degenerate is here.)

I’m getting the weird feeling that ‘investor’ is currently taking classes. There is a 1.5 hours on/off to his board pubs. Tuesday classes @UCSD are 1.5 hours long. I also notice some weird timestamps on his postings. Looks like using different computers, possibly different types (Unix vs MSFT) with possible different time-bases. That said, UCSD computers tend to be well managed and sync’d up to a time-server. Maybe high school?

Maybe it is just the noise in the back of the room making it hard for me to concentrate ;-P

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
I like your writing better than mine. When I blog, I concentrate on content rather than having it published. Which brings up this, what have you published that I might read more of your writing? What’s that? Not published?
[/quote]
There you go again, same stupid style of attack – achieves nothing. In fact it is almost ‘Jerry Springer’ like. Watch him much? I was giving you a suggestion that clarifies your content instead of copy/paste spewing. I didn’t do it to ‘slime’ someone (slime? rather juvenile way to use a noun as a verb). I make an effort to be clear and take the time to be clear.. and I do address content. So much so that I bother to quote just the section I am addressing as opposed to hitting the quickie ‘quote’ link and then spewing.

As for your statement ‘Can you not read?’, did you check what your quote looked like after you posted?
A
Single
Statement
per
line
gets
a
little
annoying
to
read

Which is why I mentioned the center quote box and why I bother to take the time to clean up the post and not keep nesting the quotes. I respect the viewer. Conciseness is important when addressing a topic.

This aspect of directly addressing the content instead of quoting in its entirety and then spewing is actually a sign of someone who may have published. It also tends to be the sign of someone who may have gone through the dissertation process.[/quote]
UC of degenerate: If this is what you call “not sliming” then I would hate to see what you call negative. (Is “sliming” a word? Please help me UC of degenerate. It passed my spellcheck tho. O no, another shortened word on a blog. Call the word police. Oh yea, UC of degenerate is here.)

I’m getting the weird feeling that ‘investor’ is currently taking classes. There is a 1.5 hours on/off to his board pubs. Tuesday classes @UCSD are 1.5 hours long. I also notice some weird timestamps on his postings. Looks like using different computers, possibly different types (Unix vs MSFT) with possible different time-bases. That said, UCSD computers tend to be well managed and sync’d up to a time-server. Maybe high school?

Maybe it is just the noise in the back of the room making it hard for me to concentrate ;-P

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
I like your writing better than mine. When I blog, I concentrate on content rather than having it published. Which brings up this, what have you published that I might read more of your writing? What’s that? Not published?
[/quote]
There you go again, same stupid style of attack – achieves nothing. In fact it is almost ‘Jerry Springer’ like. Watch him much? I was giving you a suggestion that clarifies your content instead of copy/paste spewing. I didn’t do it to ‘slime’ someone (slime? rather juvenile way to use a noun as a verb). I make an effort to be clear and take the time to be clear.. and I do address content. So much so that I bother to quote just the section I am addressing as opposed to hitting the quickie ‘quote’ link and then spewing.

As for your statement ‘Can you not read?’, did you check what your quote looked like after you posted?
A
Single
Statement
per
line
gets
a
little
annoying
to
read

Which is why I mentioned the center quote box and why I bother to take the time to clean up the post and not keep nesting the quotes. I respect the viewer. Conciseness is important when addressing a topic.

This aspect of directly addressing the content instead of quoting in its entirety and then spewing is actually a sign of someone who may have published. It also tends to be the sign of someone who may have gone through the dissertation process.[/quote]
UC of degenerate: If this is what you call “not sliming” then I would hate to see what you call negative. (Is “sliming” a word? Please help me UC of degenerate. It passed my spellcheck tho. O no, another shortened word on a blog. Call the word police. Oh yea, UC of degenerate is here.)

I’m getting the weird feeling that ‘investor’ is currently taking classes. There is a 1.5 hours on/off to his board pubs. Tuesday classes @UCSD are 1.5 hours long. I also notice some weird timestamps on his postings. Looks like using different computers, possibly different types (Unix vs MSFT) with possible different time-bases. That said, UCSD computers tend to be well managed and sync’d up to a time-server. Maybe high school?

Maybe it is just the noise in the back of the room making it hard for me to concentrate ;-P

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
I like your writing better than mine. When I blog, I concentrate on content rather than having it published. Which brings up this, what have you published that I might read more of your writing? What’s that? Not published?
[/quote]
There you go again, same stupid style of attack – achieves nothing. In fact it is almost ‘Jerry Springer’ like. Watch him much? I was giving you a suggestion that clarifies your content instead of copy/paste spewing. I didn’t do it to ‘slime’ someone (slime? rather juvenile way to use a noun as a verb). I make an effort to be clear and take the time to be clear.. and I do address content. So much so that I bother to quote just the section I am addressing as opposed to hitting the quickie ‘quote’ link and then spewing.

As for your statement ‘Can you not read?’, did you check what your quote looked like after you posted?
A
Single
Statement
per
line
gets
a
little
annoying
to
read

Which is why I mentioned the center quote box and why I bother to take the time to clean up the post and not keep nesting the quotes. I respect the viewer. Conciseness is important when addressing a topic.

This aspect of directly addressing the content instead of quoting in its entirety and then spewing is actually a sign of someone who may have published. It also tends to be the sign of someone who may have gone through the dissertation process.[/quote]
UC of degenerate: If this is what you call “not sliming” then I would hate to see what you call negative. (Is “sliming” a word? Please help me UC of degenerate. It passed my spellcheck tho. O no, another shortened word on a blog. Call the word police. Oh yea, UC of degenerate is here.)

I’m getting the weird feeling that ‘investor’ is currently taking classes. There is a 1.5 hours on/off to his board pubs. Tuesday classes @UCSD are 1.5 hours long. I also notice some weird timestamps on his postings. Looks like using different computers, possibly different types (Unix vs MSFT) with possible different time-bases. That said, UCSD computers tend to be well managed and sync’d up to a time-server. Maybe high school?

Maybe it is just the noise in the back of the room making it hard for me to concentrate ;-P

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
This was the first blog that I have written on. I didn’t think that the responses would be so verbally violent, but I guess they are.
[/quote]
[quote investor]
When I blog, I concentrate on content rather than having it published.
[/quote]
Which is it? This is the first blog you have written on or do you do it in general?

Realize that on forums such as this, you may get back as you deliver. You are likely to not have people agree with you. If you react by quoting and repeating your contentions with an added ‘barb’ to the effect that the person is a twit for not agreeing with you.. you may get it back with added ‘english’.

[quote investor]
They don’t mean anything as an investor except that I make 550 K per year gross income from them.
[/quote]
Humm.. considering the amount, only medical field generates that type of income from doctorates. Mostly in the area of Surgical Subspecialist. It is rare that any other field will. What seems to be a contra-indicator is that you have this much time to spend on this blog.

Your statement:
[quote investor]
, having bought and sold 7.7 million worth of real estate (both side of the sales side now)
[/quote]
would indicate that you are currently working Real Estate vs medical. The Real Estate field does not utilize doctorates. The italicized portion would be the explicit part I am referring to.[/quote]
It is a mystery isn’t it? How can a doctor be a real estate professional? Hmmmmm.

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
This was the first blog that I have written on. I didn’t think that the responses would be so verbally violent, but I guess they are.
[/quote]
[quote investor]
When I blog, I concentrate on content rather than having it published.
[/quote]
Which is it? This is the first blog you have written on or do you do it in general?

Realize that on forums such as this, you may get back as you deliver. You are likely to not have people agree with you. If you react by quoting and repeating your contentions with an added ‘barb’ to the effect that the person is a twit for not agreeing with you.. you may get it back with added ‘english’.

[quote investor]
They don’t mean anything as an investor except that I make 550 K per year gross income from them.
[/quote]
Humm.. considering the amount, only medical field generates that type of income from doctorates. Mostly in the area of Surgical Subspecialist. It is rare that any other field will. What seems to be a contra-indicator is that you have this much time to spend on this blog.

Your statement:
[quote investor]
, having bought and sold 7.7 million worth of real estate (both side of the sales side now)
[/quote]
would indicate that you are currently working Real Estate vs medical. The Real Estate field does not utilize doctorates. The italicized portion would be the explicit part I am referring to.[/quote]
It is a mystery isn’t it? How can a doctor be a real estate professional? Hmmmmm.

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
This was the first blog that I have written on. I didn’t think that the responses would be so verbally violent, but I guess they are.
[/quote]
[quote investor]
When I blog, I concentrate on content rather than having it published.
[/quote]
Which is it? This is the first blog you have written on or do you do it in general?

Realize that on forums such as this, you may get back as you deliver. You are likely to not have people agree with you. If you react by quoting and repeating your contentions with an added ‘barb’ to the effect that the person is a twit for not agreeing with you.. you may get it back with added ‘english’.

[quote investor]
They don’t mean anything as an investor except that I make 550 K per year gross income from them.
[/quote]
Humm.. considering the amount, only medical field generates that type of income from doctorates. Mostly in the area of Surgical Subspecialist. It is rare that any other field will. What seems to be a contra-indicator is that you have this much time to spend on this blog.

Your statement:
[quote investor]
, having bought and sold 7.7 million worth of real estate (both side of the sales side now)
[/quote]
would indicate that you are currently working Real Estate vs medical. The Real Estate field does not utilize doctorates. The italicized portion would be the explicit part I am referring to.[/quote]
It is a mystery isn’t it? How can a doctor be a real estate professional? Hmmmmm.

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
This was the first blog that I have written on. I didn’t think that the responses would be so verbally violent, but I guess they are.
[/quote]
[quote investor]
When I blog, I concentrate on content rather than having it published.
[/quote]
Which is it? This is the first blog you have written on or do you do it in general?

Realize that on forums such as this, you may get back as you deliver. You are likely to not have people agree with you. If you react by quoting and repeating your contentions with an added ‘barb’ to the effect that the person is a twit for not agreeing with you.. you may get it back with added ‘english’.

[quote investor]
They don’t mean anything as an investor except that I make 550 K per year gross income from them.
[/quote]
Humm.. considering the amount, only medical field generates that type of income from doctorates. Mostly in the area of Surgical Subspecialist. It is rare that any other field will. What seems to be a contra-indicator is that you have this much time to spend on this blog.

Your statement:
[quote investor]
, having bought and sold 7.7 million worth of real estate (both side of the sales side now)
[/quote]
would indicate that you are currently working Real Estate vs medical. The Real Estate field does not utilize doctorates. The italicized portion would be the explicit part I am referring to.[/quote]
It is a mystery isn’t it? How can a doctor be a real estate professional? Hmmmmm.

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
This was the first blog that I have written on. I didn’t think that the responses would be so verbally violent, but I guess they are.
[/quote]
[quote investor]
When I blog, I concentrate on content rather than having it published.
[/quote]
Which is it? This is the first blog you have written on or do you do it in general?

Realize that on forums such as this, you may get back as you deliver. You are likely to not have people agree with you. If you react by quoting and repeating your contentions with an added ‘barb’ to the effect that the person is a twit for not agreeing with you.. you may get it back with added ‘english’.

[quote investor]
They don’t mean anything as an investor except that I make 550 K per year gross income from them.
[/quote]
Humm.. considering the amount, only medical field generates that type of income from doctorates. Mostly in the area of Surgical Subspecialist. It is rare that any other field will. What seems to be a contra-indicator is that you have this much time to spend on this blog.

Your statement:
[quote investor]
, having bought and sold 7.7 million worth of real estate (both side of the sales side now)
[/quote]
would indicate that you are currently working Real Estate vs medical. The Real Estate field does not utilize doctorates. The italicized portion would be the explicit part I am referring to.[/quote]
It is a mystery isn’t it? How can a doctor be a real estate professional? Hmmmmm.

[investor]

[quote=pri_dk]In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?[/quote]
Finally, a thought on topic. Since I was asked to not reply to the question, I won’t.

[investor]

[quote=pri_dk]In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?[/quote]
Finally, a thought on topic. Since I was asked to not reply to the question, I won’t.

[investor]

[quote=pri_dk]In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?[/quote]
Finally, a thought on topic. Since I was asked to not reply to the question, I won’t.

[investor]

[quote=pri_dk]In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?[/quote]
Finally, a thought on topic. Since I was asked to not reply to the question, I won’t.

[investor]

[quote=pri_dk]In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?[/quote]
Finally, a thought on topic. Since I was asked to not reply to the question, I won’t.

[Author]

Posts