Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ILoveRegulation
ParticipantI wonder how many landlords don’t realize that they are just one bad tenant away from losing several years worth of profits?
ILoveRegulation
ParticipantI wonder how many landlords don’t realize that they are just one bad tenant away from losing several years worth of profits?
ILoveRegulation
ParticipantI wonder how many landlords don’t realize that they are just one bad tenant away from losing several years worth of profits?
ILoveRegulation
ParticipantI wonder how many landlords don’t realize that they are just one bad tenant away from losing several years worth of profits?
ILoveRegulation
Participant[quote=njtosd]
My point is this – it is economically impossible to eliminate cancer causing compounds from the environment. The question is the level at which toxic chemicals actually cause biological injury. Spreading pseudoscience doesn’t do anyone any good.[/quote]My point is that there is an ethics and morality component to setting pollution levels. The ‘best available technology’ standard eliminates shenanigans from ‘scientists’ and regulators who are in bed with the companies they are supposed to be regulating.
ILoveRegulation
Participant[quote=njtosd]
My point is this – it is economically impossible to eliminate cancer causing compounds from the environment. The question is the level at which toxic chemicals actually cause biological injury. Spreading pseudoscience doesn’t do anyone any good.[/quote]My point is that there is an ethics and morality component to setting pollution levels. The ‘best available technology’ standard eliminates shenanigans from ‘scientists’ and regulators who are in bed with the companies they are supposed to be regulating.
ILoveRegulation
Participant[quote=njtosd]
My point is this – it is economically impossible to eliminate cancer causing compounds from the environment. The question is the level at which toxic chemicals actually cause biological injury. Spreading pseudoscience doesn’t do anyone any good.[/quote]My point is that there is an ethics and morality component to setting pollution levels. The ‘best available technology’ standard eliminates shenanigans from ‘scientists’ and regulators who are in bed with the companies they are supposed to be regulating.
ILoveRegulation
Participant[quote=njtosd]
My point is this – it is economically impossible to eliminate cancer causing compounds from the environment. The question is the level at which toxic chemicals actually cause biological injury. Spreading pseudoscience doesn’t do anyone any good.[/quote]My point is that there is an ethics and morality component to setting pollution levels. The ‘best available technology’ standard eliminates shenanigans from ‘scientists’ and regulators who are in bed with the companies they are supposed to be regulating.
ILoveRegulation
Participant[quote=njtosd]
My point is this – it is economically impossible to eliminate cancer causing compounds from the environment. The question is the level at which toxic chemicals actually cause biological injury. Spreading pseudoscience doesn’t do anyone any good.[/quote]My point is that there is an ethics and morality component to setting pollution levels. The ‘best available technology’ standard eliminates shenanigans from ‘scientists’ and regulators who are in bed with the companies they are supposed to be regulating.
ILoveRegulation
Participant[quote=njtosd]Well – it also allowed me to TA a class at the University of Michigan entitled the Biology of Cancer and perform research at U of M hospital on a compound that is now being used to treat both cancer and hepatitis. So I guess that just makes me very versatile.[/quote]
Interesting. The Unabomber was also well-educated (PhD in Mathematics).
ILoveRegulation
Participant[quote=njtosd]Well – it also allowed me to TA a class at the University of Michigan entitled the Biology of Cancer and perform research at U of M hospital on a compound that is now being used to treat both cancer and hepatitis. So I guess that just makes me very versatile.[/quote]
Interesting. The Unabomber was also well-educated (PhD in Mathematics).
ILoveRegulation
Participant[quote=njtosd]Well – it also allowed me to TA a class at the University of Michigan entitled the Biology of Cancer and perform research at U of M hospital on a compound that is now being used to treat both cancer and hepatitis. So I guess that just makes me very versatile.[/quote]
Interesting. The Unabomber was also well-educated (PhD in Mathematics).
ILoveRegulation
Participant[quote=njtosd]Well – it also allowed me to TA a class at the University of Michigan entitled the Biology of Cancer and perform research at U of M hospital on a compound that is now being used to treat both cancer and hepatitis. So I guess that just makes me very versatile.[/quote]
Interesting. The Unabomber was also well-educated (PhD in Mathematics).
ILoveRegulation
Participant[quote=njtosd]Well – it also allowed me to TA a class at the University of Michigan entitled the Biology of Cancer and perform research at U of M hospital on a compound that is now being used to treat both cancer and hepatitis. So I guess that just makes me very versatile.[/quote]
Interesting. The Unabomber was also well-educated (PhD in Mathematics).
-
AuthorPosts
