[ILoveRegulation]

There’s a reason why the original post feels like bullsh!t. Because it is!

Here’s the real data with a link.

Median household income (SD County 2000): $60,610
Median household income (SD County 2009): $60,231

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/sep/28/household-income-plunges-in-sd-county/

California as a whole had an even bigger drop than San Diego County.

Be very skeptical of any post made by one of the many right-wing nuts who post here. If they don’t provide a link backing up what they say, assume they pulled their ‘facts’ right out of their ass.

[ILoveRegulation]

There’s a reason why the original post feels like bullsh!t. Because it is!

Here’s the real data with a link.

Median household income (SD County 2000): $60,610
Median household income (SD County 2009): $60,231

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/sep/28/household-income-plunges-in-sd-county/

California as a whole had an even bigger drop than San Diego County.

Be very skeptical of any post made by one of the many right-wing nuts who post here. If they don’t provide a link backing up what they say, assume they pulled their ‘facts’ right out of their ass.

[ILoveRegulation]

There’s a reason why the original post feels like bullsh!t. Because it is!

Here’s the real data with a link.

Median household income (SD County 2000): $60,610
Median household income (SD County 2009): $60,231

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/sep/28/household-income-plunges-in-sd-county/

California as a whole had an even bigger drop than San Diego County.

Be very skeptical of any post made by one of the many right-wing nuts who post here. If they don’t provide a link backing up what they say, assume they pulled their ‘facts’ right out of their ass.

[ILoveRegulation]

There’s a reason why the original post feels like bullsh!t. Because it is!

Here’s the real data with a link.

Median household income (SD County 2000): $60,610
Median household income (SD County 2009): $60,231

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/sep/28/household-income-plunges-in-sd-county/

California as a whole had an even bigger drop than San Diego County.

Be very skeptical of any post made by one of the many right-wing nuts who post here. If they don’t provide a link backing up what they say, assume they pulled their ‘facts’ right out of their ass.

[ILoveRegulation]

There’s a reason why the original post feels like bullsh!t. Because it is!

Here’s the real data with a link.

Median household income (SD County 2000): $60,610
Median household income (SD County 2009): $60,231

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/sep/28/household-income-plunges-in-sd-county/

California as a whole had an even bigger drop than San Diego County.

Be very skeptical of any post made by one of the many right-wing nuts who post here. If they don’t provide a link backing up what they say, assume they pulled their ‘facts’ right out of their ass.

[ILoveRegulation]

[quote=jpinpb]
FWIW, I am very against Monsanto. I do not want to argue here about it. People can eat whatever they want. If they are okay w/Monsanto, then it’s their body. I will make every effort to eat as healthy as I can. I resent being told what I should or can eat and Monsanto controlling food is exactly that. They can dress it up however they want, but that is what it boils down to.[/quote]

That’s pretty much matches my thoughts. It’s good to see there is at least one person that cares about what goes into their body.

I think I’ll follow your lead and stop arguing with the other side.

[ILoveRegulation]

[quote=jpinpb]
FWIW, I am very against Monsanto. I do not want to argue here about it. People can eat whatever they want. If they are okay w/Monsanto, then it’s their body. I will make every effort to eat as healthy as I can. I resent being told what I should or can eat and Monsanto controlling food is exactly that. They can dress it up however they want, but that is what it boils down to.[/quote]

That’s pretty much matches my thoughts. It’s good to see there is at least one person that cares about what goes into their body.

I think I’ll follow your lead and stop arguing with the other side.

[ILoveRegulation]

[quote=jpinpb]
FWIW, I am very against Monsanto. I do not want to argue here about it. People can eat whatever they want. If they are okay w/Monsanto, then it’s their body. I will make every effort to eat as healthy as I can. I resent being told what I should or can eat and Monsanto controlling food is exactly that. They can dress it up however they want, but that is what it boils down to.[/quote]

That’s pretty much matches my thoughts. It’s good to see there is at least one person that cares about what goes into their body.

I think I’ll follow your lead and stop arguing with the other side.

[ILoveRegulation]

[quote=jpinpb]
FWIW, I am very against Monsanto. I do not want to argue here about it. People can eat whatever they want. If they are okay w/Monsanto, then it’s their body. I will make every effort to eat as healthy as I can. I resent being told what I should or can eat and Monsanto controlling food is exactly that. They can dress it up however they want, but that is what it boils down to.[/quote]

That’s pretty much matches my thoughts. It’s good to see there is at least one person that cares about what goes into their body.

I think I’ll follow your lead and stop arguing with the other side.

[ILoveRegulation]

[quote=jpinpb]
FWIW, I am very against Monsanto. I do not want to argue here about it. People can eat whatever they want. If they are okay w/Monsanto, then it’s their body. I will make every effort to eat as healthy as I can. I resent being told what I should or can eat and Monsanto controlling food is exactly that. They can dress it up however they want, but that is what it boils down to.[/quote]

That’s pretty much matches my thoughts. It’s good to see there is at least one person that cares about what goes into their body.

I think I’ll follow your lead and stop arguing with the other side.

[ILoveRegulation]

The number of tards on this board is unbelievable. If the government was offering free haircuts you all would cry ‘nanny state’. However, if ExxonMobil was offering free beheadings most of you would gush about the numerous benefits before participating.

Maybe the benefit of GMOs is that they will accomplish what natural selection no longer does and thin the tard herd.

[ILoveRegulation]

The number of tards on this board is unbelievable. If the government was offering free haircuts you all would cry ‘nanny state’. However, if ExxonMobil was offering free beheadings most of you would gush about the numerous benefits before participating.

Maybe the benefit of GMOs is that they will accomplish what natural selection no longer does and thin the tard herd.

[ILoveRegulation]

The number of tards on this board is unbelievable. If the government was offering free haircuts you all would cry ‘nanny state’. However, if ExxonMobil was offering free beheadings most of you would gush about the numerous benefits before participating.

Maybe the benefit of GMOs is that they will accomplish what natural selection no longer does and thin the tard herd.

[ILoveRegulation]

The number of tards on this board is unbelievable. If the government was offering free haircuts you all would cry ‘nanny state’. However, if ExxonMobil was offering free beheadings most of you would gush about the numerous benefits before participating.

Maybe the benefit of GMOs is that they will accomplish what natural selection no longer does and thin the tard herd.

[ILoveRegulation]

The number of tards on this board is unbelievable. If the government was offering free haircuts you all would cry ‘nanny state’. However, if ExxonMobil was offering free beheadings most of you would gush about the numerous benefits before participating.

Maybe the benefit of GMOs is that they will accomplish what natural selection no longer does and thin the tard herd.

[Author]

Posts