[Hobie]

[quote=kcal09]$342 HOA covers landscaping and maintenance of common areas. Unfortunately, there are no facilities such as tennis court or swimming pool so the monthly fee seems to be quite high. Granted, there is no MR but over $4k annually is close to a hidden MR.[/quote]

HOA Landscaping costs are likely to rise as plants mature and require more time to maintain.

[Hobie]

[quote=kcal09]$342 HOA covers landscaping and maintenance of common areas. Unfortunately, there are no facilities such as tennis court or swimming pool so the monthly fee seems to be quite high. Granted, there is no MR but over $4k annually is close to a hidden MR.[/quote]

HOA Landscaping costs are likely to rise as plants mature and require more time to maintain.

[Hobie]

SkyRanchOwner: Are your water rates tiered? Would you mind sharing what an average summer/winter utility and water bill looks like.

[Hobie]

SkyRanchOwner: Are your water rates tiered? Would you mind sharing what an average summer/winter utility and water bill looks like.

[Hobie]

SkyRanchOwner: Are your water rates tiered? Would you mind sharing what an average summer/winter utility and water bill looks like.

[Hobie]

SkyRanchOwner: Are your water rates tiered? Would you mind sharing what an average summer/winter utility and water bill looks like.

[Hobie]

SkyRanchOwner: Are your water rates tiered? Would you mind sharing what an average summer/winter utility and water bill looks like.

[Hobie]

[quote=Ash Housewares]

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001-2003 beyond 2010 would increase deficits by $1.8 trillion over the following decade:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/78xx/doc7878/03-21-PresidentsBudget.pdf
[/quote]

Ash: First this report was written in 2007. The only actual data is for 2006.

But just for the sake of discussion, take a look at page 56. The table projects that deficit/spending turn show reduced deficit spending until 2011 where it turns makes a significant change to the surplus side.

But all bet’s are off due to both Bush and Obama’s stimulus spending.

Regarding the Laffer curve, I think you are mixed up with the concept. Less tax rate = more tax revenue. Read more about increased revenue from the Reagan tax cuts here:

http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/reagtxct/reagtxct.htm

[Hobie]

[quote=Ash Housewares]

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001-2003 beyond 2010 would increase deficits by $1.8 trillion over the following decade:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/78xx/doc7878/03-21-PresidentsBudget.pdf
[/quote]

Ash: First this report was written in 2007. The only actual data is for 2006.

But just for the sake of discussion, take a look at page 56. The table projects that deficit/spending turn show reduced deficit spending until 2011 where it turns makes a significant change to the surplus side.

But all bet’s are off due to both Bush and Obama’s stimulus spending.

Regarding the Laffer curve, I think you are mixed up with the concept. Less tax rate = more tax revenue. Read more about increased revenue from the Reagan tax cuts here:

http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/reagtxct/reagtxct.htm

[Hobie]

[quote=Ash Housewares]

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001-2003 beyond 2010 would increase deficits by $1.8 trillion over the following decade:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/78xx/doc7878/03-21-PresidentsBudget.pdf
[/quote]

Ash: First this report was written in 2007. The only actual data is for 2006.

But just for the sake of discussion, take a look at page 56. The table projects that deficit/spending turn show reduced deficit spending until 2011 where it turns makes a significant change to the surplus side.

But all bet’s are off due to both Bush and Obama’s stimulus spending.

Regarding the Laffer curve, I think you are mixed up with the concept. Less tax rate = more tax revenue. Read more about increased revenue from the Reagan tax cuts here:

http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/reagtxct/reagtxct.htm

[Hobie]

[quote=Ash Housewares]

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001-2003 beyond 2010 would increase deficits by $1.8 trillion over the following decade:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/78xx/doc7878/03-21-PresidentsBudget.pdf
[/quote]

Ash: First this report was written in 2007. The only actual data is for 2006.

But just for the sake of discussion, take a look at page 56. The table projects that deficit/spending turn show reduced deficit spending until 2011 where it turns makes a significant change to the surplus side.

But all bet’s are off due to both Bush and Obama’s stimulus spending.

Regarding the Laffer curve, I think you are mixed up with the concept. Less tax rate = more tax revenue. Read more about increased revenue from the Reagan tax cuts here:

http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/reagtxct/reagtxct.htm

[Hobie]

[quote=Ash Housewares]

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts of 2001-2003 beyond 2010 would increase deficits by $1.8 trillion over the following decade:
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/78xx/doc7878/03-21-PresidentsBudget.pdf
[/quote]

Ash: First this report was written in 2007. The only actual data is for 2006.

But just for the sake of discussion, take a look at page 56. The table projects that deficit/spending turn show reduced deficit spending until 2011 where it turns makes a significant change to the surplus side.

But all bet’s are off due to both Bush and Obama’s stimulus spending.

Regarding the Laffer curve, I think you are mixed up with the concept. Less tax rate = more tax revenue. Read more about increased revenue from the Reagan tax cuts here:

http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/reagtxct/reagtxct.htm

[Hobie]

[quote=afx114][quote=flu]One President that hopefully won’t see a second term…..[/quote]

Lets take a straw poll on who will beat him… Newt? Palin? Romney? Cheney Jr? Yet unknown savior of the GOP?[/quote]

This is exactly the reason Obama won in the first place. Repubs need another Reagan. I am more sad that you 😉

[Hobie]

[quote=afx114][quote=flu]One President that hopefully won’t see a second term…..[/quote]

Lets take a straw poll on who will beat him… Newt? Palin? Romney? Cheney Jr? Yet unknown savior of the GOP?[/quote]

This is exactly the reason Obama won in the first place. Repubs need another Reagan. I am more sad that you 😉

[Hobie]

[quote=afx114][quote=flu]One President that hopefully won’t see a second term…..[/quote]

Lets take a straw poll on who will beat him… Newt? Palin? Romney? Cheney Jr? Yet unknown savior of the GOP?[/quote]

This is exactly the reason Obama won in the first place. Repubs need another Reagan. I am more sad that you 😉

[Author]

Posts