[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

(I see that while I was slowly mis-typing my response that UCgal found similar info on-line.)

Anyway, I don’t think panicking is ever beneficial when selling property or investments.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

(I see that while I was slowly mis-typing my response that UCgal found similar info on-line.)

Anyway, I don’t think panicking is ever beneficial when selling property or investments.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Regardless of when it closes, smart buyers will know about this property. IF you listed yours a and IF it went into escrow sometime before that property closes, chances are you will not get through escrow without the other property showing up either as sold or back on the market.

I would based when I list on other factors, such as its readiness to show, the existing competition on the MLS for comparable properties, and the local state of the market. Sicne you are purchasing another before selling this one, I assume that you would be able to hold on and keep it as a rental if all else fails.
Otherwsie, I would have sold first then purchased.

SDL does not show listing, but zillow does (removed sept 4).

Here is the property on SDL: http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-617325F3-2411_La_Tinada_Ct_Carlsbad_CA_92009

Zillow:
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2411-La-Tinada-Ct-Carlsbad-CA-92009/16710355_zpid/

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Regardless of when it closes, smart buyers will know about this property. IF you listed yours a and IF it went into escrow sometime before that property closes, chances are you will not get through escrow without the other property showing up either as sold or back on the market.

I would based when I list on other factors, such as its readiness to show, the existing competition on the MLS for comparable properties, and the local state of the market. Sicne you are purchasing another before selling this one, I assume that you would be able to hold on and keep it as a rental if all else fails.
Otherwsie, I would have sold first then purchased.

SDL does not show listing, but zillow does (removed sept 4).

Here is the property on SDL: http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-617325F3-2411_La_Tinada_Ct_Carlsbad_CA_92009

Zillow:
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2411-La-Tinada-Ct-Carlsbad-CA-92009/16710355_zpid/

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Regardless of when it closes, smart buyers will know about this property. IF you listed yours a and IF it went into escrow sometime before that property closes, chances are you will not get through escrow without the other property showing up either as sold or back on the market.

I would based when I list on other factors, such as its readiness to show, the existing competition on the MLS for comparable properties, and the local state of the market. Sicne you are purchasing another before selling this one, I assume that you would be able to hold on and keep it as a rental if all else fails.
Otherwsie, I would have sold first then purchased.

SDL does not show listing, but zillow does (removed sept 4).

Here is the property on SDL: http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-617325F3-2411_La_Tinada_Ct_Carlsbad_CA_92009

Zillow:
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2411-La-Tinada-Ct-Carlsbad-CA-92009/16710355_zpid/

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Regardless of when it closes, smart buyers will know about this property. IF you listed yours a and IF it went into escrow sometime before that property closes, chances are you will not get through escrow without the other property showing up either as sold or back on the market.

I would based when I list on other factors, such as its readiness to show, the existing competition on the MLS for comparable properties, and the local state of the market. Sicne you are purchasing another before selling this one, I assume that you would be able to hold on and keep it as a rental if all else fails.
Otherwsie, I would have sold first then purchased.

SDL does not show listing, but zillow does (removed sept 4).

Here is the property on SDL: http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-617325F3-2411_La_Tinada_Ct_Carlsbad_CA_92009

Zillow:
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2411-La-Tinada-Ct-Carlsbad-CA-92009/16710355_zpid/

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Regardless of when it closes, smart buyers will know about this property. IF you listed yours a and IF it went into escrow sometime before that property closes, chances are you will not get through escrow without the other property showing up either as sold or back on the market.

I would based when I list on other factors, such as its readiness to show, the existing competition on the MLS for comparable properties, and the local state of the market. Sicne you are purchasing another before selling this one, I assume that you would be able to hold on and keep it as a rental if all else fails.
Otherwsie, I would have sold first then purchased.

SDL does not show listing, but zillow does (removed sept 4).

Here is the property on SDL: http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-617325F3-2411_La_Tinada_Ct_Carlsbad_CA_92009

Zillow:
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2411-La-Tinada-Ct-Carlsbad-CA-92009/16710355_zpid/

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Here’s a book to read :

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Here’s a book to read :

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Here’s a book to read :

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Here’s a book to read :

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

Here’s a book to read :

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

A patent would only protect the holder’s rights. It can’t force a market place to use it.

The little guy has a huge hurdle due to the vested interest and large $ amounts involved.

As an example look at the FSO market.

But, the good news is that the current model seems to have some inefficiencies. Where there is inefficiency there is room for removing these inefficiencies and taking a small delta in profit. A well-capitalized entity has a better change of exploiting those inefficiencies and eventially profiting, assuming they can absorb any hurdles to start-up costs.

Companies like Redfin and Ziprealty are incremental examples. They essentially are turning some of the profit over to the buyer in exchange for giving fewer services and having the buyer doing some of the leg work. It’s a small change, and may or may not stick, but it’s a step.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

A patent would only protect the holder’s rights. It can’t force a market place to use it.

The little guy has a huge hurdle due to the vested interest and large $ amounts involved.

As an example look at the FSO market.

But, the good news is that the current model seems to have some inefficiencies. Where there is inefficiency there is room for removing these inefficiencies and taking a small delta in profit. A well-capitalized entity has a better change of exploiting those inefficiencies and eventially profiting, assuming they can absorb any hurdles to start-up costs.

Companies like Redfin and Ziprealty are incremental examples. They essentially are turning some of the profit over to the buyer in exchange for giving fewer services and having the buyer doing some of the leg work. It’s a small change, and may or may not stick, but it’s a step.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

A patent would only protect the holder’s rights. It can’t force a market place to use it.

The little guy has a huge hurdle due to the vested interest and large $ amounts involved.

As an example look at the FSO market.

But, the good news is that the current model seems to have some inefficiencies. Where there is inefficiency there is room for removing these inefficiencies and taking a small delta in profit. A well-capitalized entity has a better change of exploiting those inefficiencies and eventially profiting, assuming they can absorb any hurdles to start-up costs.

Companies like Redfin and Ziprealty are incremental examples. They essentially are turning some of the profit over to the buyer in exchange for giving fewer services and having the buyer doing some of the leg work. It’s a small change, and may or may not stick, but it’s a step.

[Author]

Posts