Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantOK, I’ll play along.
We have bills because of either a good or service that we selected, purchased or otherwise signed up for.
If one does not pay, it is theft.
I think I became fully conscious of my obligation for paying for stuff that I wanted to buy at about 8 years old.
This is quite simple for me …
You have every right to live whatever frugal, self-sustaining, (hermit in the forest) lifestyle you want. But if you want something from someone you have to either barter for it, pay for it, or convince them to give it to you for free.ParticipantOK, I’ll play along.
We have bills because of either a good or service that we selected, purchased or otherwise signed up for.
If one does not pay, it is theft.
I think I became fully conscious of my obligation for paying for stuff that I wanted to buy at about 8 years old.
This is quite simple for me …
You have every right to live whatever frugal, self-sustaining, (hermit in the forest) lifestyle you want. But if you want something from someone you have to either barter for it, pay for it, or convince them to give it to you for free.ParticipantOK, I’ll play along.
We have bills because of either a good or service that we selected, purchased or otherwise signed up for.
If one does not pay, it is theft.
I think I became fully conscious of my obligation for paying for stuff that I wanted to buy at about 8 years old.
This is quite simple for me …
You have every right to live whatever frugal, self-sustaining, (hermit in the forest) lifestyle you want. But if you want something from someone you have to either barter for it, pay for it, or convince them to give it to you for free.ParticipantOK, I’ll play along.
We have bills because of either a good or service that we selected, purchased or otherwise signed up for.
If one does not pay, it is theft.
I think I became fully conscious of my obligation for paying for stuff that I wanted to buy at about 8 years old.
This is quite simple for me …
You have every right to live whatever frugal, self-sustaining, (hermit in the forest) lifestyle you want. But if you want something from someone you have to either barter for it, pay for it, or convince them to give it to you for free.ParticipantI think I just scratched USC off the list of potential schools for my children.
ParticipantI think I just scratched USC off the list of potential schools for my children.
ParticipantI think I just scratched USC off the list of potential schools for my children.
ParticipantI think I just scratched USC off the list of potential schools for my children.
ParticipantI think I just scratched USC off the list of potential schools for my children.
ParticipantDid you already send the letter.
I think you have the % declines and the price ranges reversed. …
What you failed to mention is that per the Case-Shiller index homes under $475k have fallen 7.2% from their peak; homes $475-$676k have fallen 12.3%, and homes over $676k have fallen 16.4% and there is no signs of stopping.
It’s the homes under 475K have declined 16.4%.
ParticipantDid you already send the letter.
I think you have the % declines and the price ranges reversed. …
What you failed to mention is that per the Case-Shiller index homes under $475k have fallen 7.2% from their peak; homes $475-$676k have fallen 12.3%, and homes over $676k have fallen 16.4% and there is no signs of stopping.
It’s the homes under 475K have declined 16.4%.
ParticipantDid you already send the letter.
I think you have the % declines and the price ranges reversed. …
What you failed to mention is that per the Case-Shiller index homes under $475k have fallen 7.2% from their peak; homes $475-$676k have fallen 12.3%, and homes over $676k have fallen 16.4% and there is no signs of stopping.
It’s the homes under 475K have declined 16.4%.
ParticipantDid you already send the letter.
I think you have the % declines and the price ranges reversed. …
What you failed to mention is that per the Case-Shiller index homes under $475k have fallen 7.2% from their peak; homes $475-$676k have fallen 12.3%, and homes over $676k have fallen 16.4% and there is no signs of stopping.
It’s the homes under 475K have declined 16.4%.
ParticipantDid you already send the letter.
I think you have the % declines and the price ranges reversed. …
What you failed to mention is that per the Case-Shiller index homes under $475k have fallen 7.2% from their peak; homes $475-$676k have fallen 12.3%, and homes over $676k have fallen 16.4% and there is no signs of stopping.
It’s the homes under 475K have declined 16.4%.
-
AuthorPosts
