CS never said it did anything other than cover those metro areas, which is certainly a significant sample. If SOME of those areas are harder hit, then CS is accurately measuring that. So what’s the problem? I like how the author complains that CS tracks houses bought/sold in the last few years. Gee, the market tanked in the last few years. Can’t have any of that data!
CS never said it did anything other than cover those metro areas, which is certainly a significant sample. If SOME of those areas are harder hit, then CS is accurately measuring that. So what’s the problem? I like how the author complains that CS tracks houses bought/sold in the last few years. Gee, the market tanked in the last few years. Can’t have any of that data!
CS never said it did anything other than cover those metro areas, which is certainly a significant sample. If SOME of those areas are harder hit, then CS is accurately measuring that. So what’s the problem? I like how the author complains that CS tracks houses bought/sold in the last few years. Gee, the market tanked in the last few years. Can’t have any of that data!
CS never said it did anything other than cover those metro areas, which is certainly a significant sample. If SOME of those areas are harder hit, then CS is accurately measuring that. So what’s the problem? I like how the author complains that CS tracks houses bought/sold in the last few years. Gee, the market tanked in the last few years. Can’t have any of that data!
