Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=briansd1]
But having lived abroad, I must say that there are other attractions to living overseas. You live abroad for the culture and the adventure.
There’s something special about an American living abroad. As an expat, you’re cool and special. And if you take the time to learn the foreign language you can make friends that you would never meet in America so your life and experiences are richer. People are always fascinated and curious about American culture and you can be sort of an ambassador for the American way of life (whatever you think it should be).
I’d be happy to live in a one-bedroom apartment in a foreign capital somewhere in the world. My plan for retirement is to spend most of my time abroad with a base in San Diego.[/quote]
Totally agree with you Brian. The culture and adventure are really amazing. I still remember when I was telling family and friends I was going to quit my job, sell my house and properties, cars and move out of the USA, everyone thought I was crazy! To me the adventure was so exciting.
And you’re right..you DEFINITELY have to learn the language if you want a truly rewarding experience. To be honest, most of the Americans I met abroad never took the time to learn the local language. For that reason I never had any real desire to hang out with too many ex-pats that didn’t want to learn the local language. My most rewarding and long-lasting friendships I made were with the locals.
I also plan to spend a good bit of time in retirement abroad. Once the kids are out of the house and in college. I still would keep a property in San Diego but as you mentioned Brian, in a world capital city, properties are much smaller and everything is closer. You can get away with a fabulous one bedroom apartment in the heart of the city.
Traveling and getting to know the world is one of the most amazing things to me…
earlyretirement
ParticipantThanks sdrealtor. I just sent you a PM.
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=UCGal]
As I hinted at in the retire early thread, I have a hard time factoring in the home equity into “wealth” calculations. You can’t spend a house and if you want to live in it, you can’t sell it. Home equity is only wealth when your ready to sell. If the bulk of your wealth is in an illiquid asset that you’re unwilling to sell, are you really wealthy?[/quote]
I TOTALLY agree with you UCGal. I don’t think anyone should be factoring in any home equity or supposed home equity in their retirement assets. Even if the home is paid for and worth a million bucks. I still think you have to count any assets besides your asset in your home.
As you mentioned, home equity is only wealth when you are ready to sell but also IF you are able to sell it. I think anyone counting their equity in their home in their retirement plans isn’t being conservative enough.
Sdsurfer,
Yes, absolutely safety is a big factor. There are some gorgeous places around the world that are wonderful to visit for a vacation of a few weeks or even a few months but living there full time isn’t the best or the easiest.
Some places the cost of living can be GREAT but there can be safety issues to deal with. Then other places the real estate might not be as expensive as San Diego but the utilities can be sky high. Some places I own I was getting $500 a month water bills!
Even in some beautiful cities that aren’t dangerous you still have a hassle factor of petty crime. I owned a house a few blocks from the beach in Punta del Este, Uruguay (“St. Tropez of South America”) and while it is VERY safe there, the summer is only the real time that it’s busy. Many houses are owned by wealthy owners that only use it during the summer. So you have to deal with break ins the rest of the season.
I had my house broken into twice even having a good security system and also being a few doors down from a police station. Both times they got expensive LCD TV’s where they are 300% more expensive than in the USA. And to make it worse, thieves figured out that they can rob people even during summer so they will go in and rob their houses while they are at the beach.
So you have things like that you have to deal with in some locations.
In other countries you have to deal with corrupt police or run away inflation. In countries like Argentina, where I own properties, you have 25% to 30% ANNUAL inflation. So your expenses go up each year typically by large amounts. Or if you have employees, you’re forced to give 25% to 30% a YEAR raises mandatory by law!
In places like Rio de Janeiro, Brazil where I bought many years ago….yeah the place is worth a LOT more than a decade ago but with the horrible fluctuation in the exchange rate, things are much more expensive. It’s more expensive there vs. the USA with many things. Plus even in exclusive and expensive areas like Ipanema, you have luxury condos not far from the slums. And again you have to deal with crime.
So you just have a multitude of things to deal with vs. the USA. For as many problems and issues that the USA has…people don’t realize how wonderful it is to live in and the excellent quality of life.
In other places it just comes down to tons of red tape and not efficient to be full time. Like not getting mail or it constantly getting lost, waiting in line at the post office up to 2 hours to get a package, waiting in lines for up to 45 minutes at the grocery store, power outages, etc.
Like I said before… San Diego is paradise. Yeah, there are many pikers here but I agree with sdrealtor that San Diego North County is full of truly affluent as well that are living within their means. It’s all relative…
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=sdsurfer]
North County is pretty much the best place in the world as far as I’m concerned. One of my old neighbors confirmed it the other day. He said that he has homes around the world(including one in Bali) for work in the oil industry because he travels a lot. He said that if he could retire and sell all the places the one he’d keep in the one on Neptune. He said he’d just go for a walk down neptune everday with his dog and wife and that would be all he needs.I know lots of people like him.[/quote]
sdsurfer,
I’d have to absolutely 100% agree with you. SD North Country to me is one of the best places in the world when you look at all the quality of life factors in play.
I’ve been all over the world (550+ cities and counting) and I also own a few homes and properties in other countries and while some have certain factors that are great… none can match the overall quality of life, safety, year-round weather, and convenience of San Diego.
When we were deciding to settle down with our kids to raise them, we could have moved to any city in the world and San Diego was a no brainer. This is one of the best places on Earth to live.
earlyretirement
ParticipantI don’t think you necessarily aren’t down to earth just because you drive an expensive car or have nice things. It’s all relative. I consider myself extremely down to earth as well are many of my clients/friends that are what I’d consider affluent.
Yeah, many of them drive around expensive cars, have nice clothes, take expensive trips but the biggest difference is they are living within their means (or below their means when you consider most could go out and buy whatever they wanted in life) and most of them have no debt at all.
There are plenty of truly affluent people in San Diego that are down to earth. There are a lot of pikers/fakers as well that have no net worth and driving around a fancy and expensive car but make no mistake San Diego is full of affluent down to earth people.
I don’t necessarily think driving a cheap car makes you “down to earth”. I think it’s all about living within your means.
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=earlyretirement]. . . You’re right it can be done more affordably. Check out http://www.homeexchange.com if you can. While we would never swap with our primary residence we live in, we have all of our rental properties we own up and we get exchange requests just about every day for all over the world.
Airline tickets are still very expensive flying for 4 but at least most of the times we don’t stay in hotels anymore. Some of the places are incredible. Never had a bad experience doing a lot of screening. And in many places people have offered to let us use their car.
We don’t do the car swap just for liability reasons but the home swap is a GREAT way to travel in retirement. We are spending next summer in Paris and in the French Riviera all on home exchanges….. January in Lake Tahoe on a home exchange and February in San Francisco on a home exchange.
Check it out if you haven’t already…. the way to travel…[/quote]
Thanks, ER. I have thought of this. My home is in a walkable community with a lot of public transportation nearby and only 10-11 miles from dtn SD and about 9 miles from the Int’l border. I actually COULD lock up file cabinets and “stage” my home for a “Home Exchange.” However, I have issues with pets being cared for at home while I’m out of town and also a resident kid attending year-round school, so this idea is unworkable at the moment. As I posted here last year, I have stayed in South Lake Tahoe a few times as guests in other parties’ timeshares – for the sole purpose of skiing Heavenly.
see: http://piggington.com/what_of_your_net_income_goes_to_saving
These opportunities will always be available because timeshare owners cannot often use their weeks and need reimbursement for their 1/52 portion HOA dues and property taxes that they have to pay every year, whether they use the property or not. This route is more comfortable, has more amenities, sleeps more people and MUCH cheaper than commercial lodging, due to the high transient occupancy tax in Lake Tahoe (to fund needed firefighting services and improvements).
I LOVE both Lake Tahoe and SF. I can stay in SF for free with my kid(s), who have free slant pkg and also are on bus line(s). One can ride ALL DAY in SF (bus/streetcar/cablecar/BART) for just $2![/quote]
Ah, yeah it’s tougher if you have pets but MANY of the home exchanges we have done but they kept the pets with someone else or a neighbor. We didn’t want the responsibility of it.
Maybe when your child is done with school it will be workable. A few of the home exchanges we have done have been 2nd homes or vacation homes but the overwhelming majority are places where people live as their primary residence.
Definitely you have to have a lot of trust and do a bit of screening but we’ve not had any negative experiences in over 30 exchanges around the world.
You’re right about Lake Tahoe and the endless amounts of timeshares there. We’ve gone to Lake Tahoe every year on home exchanges and going again in February.
Plus once you make some good connections, you have a place to stay each year. We’ve become good friends with some home exchange partners and do home exchanges with them each year. Really convenient when it comes to expensive cities like London or Paris or New York City.
I always recommend home exchanges to anyone close to retirement or especially those that own rental properties. It sounded really strange to me a few years ago before we started it but now it’s become almost a way of life for us to see the world and experience life as locals in every city we go to.
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=earlyretirement]. . . You’re right it can be done more affordably. Check out http://www.homeexchange.com if you can. While we would never swap with our primary residence we live in, we have all of our rental properties we own up and we get exchange requests just about every day for all over the world.
Airline tickets are still very expensive flying for 4 but at least most of the times we don’t stay in hotels anymore. Some of the places are incredible. Never had a bad experience doing a lot of screening. And in many places people have offered to let us use their car.
We don’t do the car swap just for liability reasons but the home swap is a GREAT way to travel in retirement. We are spending next summer in Paris and in the French Riviera all on home exchanges….. January in Lake Tahoe on a home exchange and February in San Francisco on a home exchange.
Check it out if you haven’t already…. the way to travel…[/quote]
Thanks, ER. I have thought of this. My home is in a walkable community with a lot of public transportation nearby and only 10-11 miles from dtn SD and about 9 miles from the Int’l border. I actually COULD lock up file cabinets and “stage” my home for a “Home Exchange.” However, I have issues with pets being cared for at home while I’m out of town and also a resident kid attending year-round school, so this idea is unworkable at the moment. As I posted here last year, I have stayed in South Lake Tahoe a few times as guests in other parties’ timeshares – for the sole purpose of skiing Heavenly.
see: http://piggington.com/what_of_your_net_income_goes_to_saving
These opportunities will always be available because timeshare owners cannot often use their weeks and need reimbursement for their 1/52 portion HOA dues and property taxes that they have to pay every year, whether they use the property or not. This route is more comfortable, has more amenities, sleeps more people and MUCH cheaper than commercial lodging, due to the high transient occupancy tax in Lake Tahoe (to fund needed firefighting services and improvements).
I LOVE both Lake Tahoe and SF. I can stay in SF for free with my kid(s), who have free slant pkg and also are on bus line(s). One can ride ALL DAY in SF (bus/streetcar/cablecar/BART) for just $2![/quote]
Ah, yeah it’s tougher if you have pets but MANY of the home exchanges we have done but they kept the pets with someone else or a neighbor. We didn’t want the responsibility of it.
Maybe when your child is done with school it will be workable. A few of the home exchanges we have done have been 2nd homes or vacation homes but the overwhelming majority are places where people live as their primary residence.
Definitely you have to have a lot of trust and do a bit of screening but we’ve not had any negative experiences in over 30 exchanges around the world.
You’re right about Lake Tahoe and the endless amounts of timeshares there. We’ve gone to Lake Tahoe every year on home exchanges and going again in February.
Plus once you make some good connections, you have a place to stay each year. We’ve become good friends with some home exchange partners and do home exchanges with them each year. Really convenient when it comes to expensive cities like London or Paris or New York City.
I always recommend home exchanges to anyone close to retirement or especially those that own rental properties. It sounded really strange to me a few years ago before we started it but now it’s become almost a way of life for us to see the world and experience life as locals in every city we go to.
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=earlyretirement]. . . You’re right it can be done more affordably. Check out http://www.homeexchange.com if you can. While we would never swap with our primary residence we live in, we have all of our rental properties we own up and we get exchange requests just about every day for all over the world.
Airline tickets are still very expensive flying for 4 but at least most of the times we don’t stay in hotels anymore. Some of the places are incredible. Never had a bad experience doing a lot of screening. And in many places people have offered to let us use their car.
We don’t do the car swap just for liability reasons but the home swap is a GREAT way to travel in retirement. We are spending next summer in Paris and in the French Riviera all on home exchanges….. January in Lake Tahoe on a home exchange and February in San Francisco on a home exchange.
Check it out if you haven’t already…. the way to travel…[/quote]
Thanks, ER. I have thought of this. My home is in a walkable community with a lot of public transportation nearby and only 10-11 miles from dtn SD and about 9 miles from the Int’l border. I actually COULD lock up file cabinets and “stage” my home for a “Home Exchange.” However, I have issues with pets being cared for at home while I’m out of town and also a resident kid attending year-round school, so this idea is unworkable at the moment. As I posted here last year, I have stayed in South Lake Tahoe a few times as guests in other parties’ timeshares – for the sole purpose of skiing Heavenly.
see: http://piggington.com/what_of_your_net_income_goes_to_saving
These opportunities will always be available because timeshare owners cannot often use their weeks and need reimbursement for their 1/52 portion HOA dues and property taxes that they have to pay every year, whether they use the property or not. This route is more comfortable, has more amenities, sleeps more people and MUCH cheaper than commercial lodging, due to the high transient occupancy tax in Lake Tahoe (to fund needed firefighting services and improvements).
I LOVE both Lake Tahoe and SF. I can stay in SF for free with my kid(s), who have free slant pkg and also are on bus line(s). One can ride ALL DAY in SF (bus/streetcar/cablecar/BART) for just $2![/quote]
Ah, yeah it’s tougher if you have pets but MANY of the home exchanges we have done but they kept the pets with someone else or a neighbor. We didn’t want the responsibility of it.
Maybe when your child is done with school it will be workable. A few of the home exchanges we have done have been 2nd homes or vacation homes but the overwhelming majority are places where people live as their primary residence.
Definitely you have to have a lot of trust and do a bit of screening but we’ve not had any negative experiences in over 30 exchanges around the world.
You’re right about Lake Tahoe and the endless amounts of timeshares there. We’ve gone to Lake Tahoe every year on home exchanges and going again in February.
Plus once you make some good connections, you have a place to stay each year. We’ve become good friends with some home exchange partners and do home exchanges with them each year. Really convenient when it comes to expensive cities like London or Paris or New York City.
I always recommend home exchanges to anyone close to retirement or especially those that own rental properties. It sounded really strange to me a few years ago before we started it but now it’s become almost a way of life for us to see the world and experience life as locals in every city we go to.
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=cvmom][quote=bearishgurl]
I think a simpler life is what we should all aspire to in “retirement.”[/quote]Sounds good, except in addition, I’d really like to travel more…[/quote]
Understand completely. I’m a self-described “queen of road trips.” I just got back from one in July that was 4600 miles and have 3 more (shorter ones) to take this year. HOWEVER, I stay 75% of the time at friends’ and relatives’ homes and help with groceries to keep my expenses down.
This is why I think that even if you are “old,” you still need a vehicle (preferably an older one where the insurance premiums aren’t too high), even if you don’t use it much. It’s nice to be able to “hit the road” as long as you are still able to drive :=]
As far as flying, I usually only do so with deeply-discounted tix, complimentary tix, or tix purchased with “points.” I don’t like to fly because I like to drive my own vehicle when I get there. I don’t care as much to drive borrowed vehicles or rental cars that I’m not as familiar with or don’t feel as safe in.[/quote]
Hey BG,
Wow…that’s a long road trip! With 2 young kids we typically don’t like driving and they are VERY good on planes as they are so used to flying so we mostly fly but as they get older we’ll drive more.
I think traveling is one of the best and funnest things you can do in retirement (if it’s within your budget). Seeing new cities and new cultures for me is the best and always fascinating to me.
You’re right it can be done more affordably. Check out http://www.homeexchange.com if you can. While we would never swap with our primary residence we live in, we have all of our rental properties we own up and we get exchange requests just about every day for all over the world.
Airline tickets are still very expensive flying for 4 but at least most of the times we don’t stay in hotels anymore. Some of the places are incredible. Never had a bad experience doing a lot of screening. And in many places people have offered to let us use their car.
We don’t do the car swap just for liability reasons but the home swap is a GREAT way to travel in retirement. We are spending next summer in Paris and in the French Riviera and Rome all on home exchanges….. January in Lake Tahoe on a home exchange and February in San Francisco on a home exchange.
Check it out if you haven’t already…. the way to travel…
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=cvmom][quote=bearishgurl]
I think a simpler life is what we should all aspire to in “retirement.”[/quote]Sounds good, except in addition, I’d really like to travel more…[/quote]
Understand completely. I’m a self-described “queen of road trips.” I just got back from one in July that was 4600 miles and have 3 more (shorter ones) to take this year. HOWEVER, I stay 75% of the time at friends’ and relatives’ homes and help with groceries to keep my expenses down.
This is why I think that even if you are “old,” you still need a vehicle (preferably an older one where the insurance premiums aren’t too high), even if you don’t use it much. It’s nice to be able to “hit the road” as long as you are still able to drive :=]
As far as flying, I usually only do so with deeply-discounted tix, complimentary tix, or tix purchased with “points.” I don’t like to fly because I like to drive my own vehicle when I get there. I don’t care as much to drive borrowed vehicles or rental cars that I’m not as familiar with or don’t feel as safe in.[/quote]
Hey BG,
Wow…that’s a long road trip! With 2 young kids we typically don’t like driving and they are VERY good on planes as they are so used to flying so we mostly fly but as they get older we’ll drive more.
I think traveling is one of the best and funnest things you can do in retirement (if it’s within your budget). Seeing new cities and new cultures for me is the best and always fascinating to me.
You’re right it can be done more affordably. Check out http://www.homeexchange.com if you can. While we would never swap with our primary residence we live in, we have all of our rental properties we own up and we get exchange requests just about every day for all over the world.
Airline tickets are still very expensive flying for 4 but at least most of the times we don’t stay in hotels anymore. Some of the places are incredible. Never had a bad experience doing a lot of screening. And in many places people have offered to let us use their car.
We don’t do the car swap just for liability reasons but the home swap is a GREAT way to travel in retirement. We are spending next summer in Paris and in the French Riviera and Rome all on home exchanges….. January in Lake Tahoe on a home exchange and February in San Francisco on a home exchange.
Check it out if you haven’t already…. the way to travel…
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=cvmom][quote=bearishgurl]
I think a simpler life is what we should all aspire to in “retirement.”[/quote]Sounds good, except in addition, I’d really like to travel more…[/quote]
Understand completely. I’m a self-described “queen of road trips.” I just got back from one in July that was 4600 miles and have 3 more (shorter ones) to take this year. HOWEVER, I stay 75% of the time at friends’ and relatives’ homes and help with groceries to keep my expenses down.
This is why I think that even if you are “old,” you still need a vehicle (preferably an older one where the insurance premiums aren’t too high), even if you don’t use it much. It’s nice to be able to “hit the road” as long as you are still able to drive :=]
As far as flying, I usually only do so with deeply-discounted tix, complimentary tix, or tix purchased with “points.” I don’t like to fly because I like to drive my own vehicle when I get there. I don’t care as much to drive borrowed vehicles or rental cars that I’m not as familiar with or don’t feel as safe in.[/quote]
Hey BG,
Wow…that’s a long road trip! With 2 young kids we typically don’t like driving and they are VERY good on planes as they are so used to flying so we mostly fly but as they get older we’ll drive more.
I think traveling is one of the best and funnest things you can do in retirement (if it’s within your budget). Seeing new cities and new cultures for me is the best and always fascinating to me.
You’re right it can be done more affordably. Check out http://www.homeexchange.com if you can. While we would never swap with our primary residence we live in, we have all of our rental properties we own up and we get exchange requests just about every day for all over the world.
Airline tickets are still very expensive flying for 4 but at least most of the times we don’t stay in hotels anymore. Some of the places are incredible. Never had a bad experience doing a lot of screening. And in many places people have offered to let us use their car.
We don’t do the car swap just for liability reasons but the home swap is a GREAT way to travel in retirement. We are spending next summer in Paris and in the French Riviera and Rome all on home exchanges….. January in Lake Tahoe on a home exchange and February in San Francisco on a home exchange.
Check it out if you haven’t already…. the way to travel…
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=CA renter]Not sure what your schedule is like, or if you’re willing to do your own work on the transaction, but if you want to save on commissions, you can list with a “listing only” broker and save a ton of money. I would recommend 2.5% to the selling (buyer’s) broker who will show the house and deal with that side of the transaction. You can also show it yourself if that’s what you want to do if a potential buyer contacts you directly.
Here’s the info for Jeff Karchin, a local broker who will list for a flat fee (~$300, IIRC):
If you want an attorney to help you with any questions, I highly recommend Kingside (that’s his username here on Piggington’s) — you can PM him through the messages function in the top left corner of this site.
Good luck![/quote]
Is this guy still around? His website doesn’t seem to be working?
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=CA renter]Not sure what your schedule is like, or if you’re willing to do your own work on the transaction, but if you want to save on commissions, you can list with a “listing only” broker and save a ton of money. I would recommend 2.5% to the selling (buyer’s) broker who will show the house and deal with that side of the transaction. You can also show it yourself if that’s what you want to do if a potential buyer contacts you directly.
Here’s the info for Jeff Karchin, a local broker who will list for a flat fee (~$300, IIRC):
If you want an attorney to help you with any questions, I highly recommend Kingside (that’s his username here on Piggington’s) — you can PM him through the messages function in the top left corner of this site.
Good luck![/quote]
Is this guy still around? His website doesn’t seem to be working?
earlyretirement
Participant[quote=CA renter]Not sure what your schedule is like, or if you’re willing to do your own work on the transaction, but if you want to save on commissions, you can list with a “listing only” broker and save a ton of money. I would recommend 2.5% to the selling (buyer’s) broker who will show the house and deal with that side of the transaction. You can also show it yourself if that’s what you want to do if a potential buyer contacts you directly.
Here’s the info for Jeff Karchin, a local broker who will list for a flat fee (~$300, IIRC):
If you want an attorney to help you with any questions, I highly recommend Kingside (that’s his username here on Piggington’s) — you can PM him through the messages function in the top left corner of this site.
Good luck![/quote]
Is this guy still around? His website doesn’t seem to be working?
-
AuthorPosts
