Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
drunkle
Participantwith regards to the idea of buying what nobody else wants… some housing related stocks are floating around $1…
Participanti think that answers the question of when the market (in temecula, anyway) is going to “drop”. next year. with so many average joe’s waiting for the market to pick up next year, either they get slaughtered because the market continues to drag or they flood market all at once and create a glut. either way…
Participanti think that answers the question of when the market (in temecula, anyway) is going to “drop”. next year. with so many average joe’s waiting for the market to pick up next year, either they get slaughtered because the market continues to drag or they flood market all at once and create a glut. either way…
Participanta downtown condo near the bay and with an ocean view would be nice as a second home. but no garage, downtown traffic, no guest parking, limited “family” environment…
for trendy, “chic”, affluent young adults, it’s cool, it’s hip… but overpriced for what it is. not like downtown sd is anything other than a tourist attraction. and drunk tank.
and downtown sucks.
Participanta downtown condo near the bay and with an ocean view would be nice as a second home. but no garage, downtown traffic, no guest parking, limited “family” environment…
for trendy, “chic”, affluent young adults, it’s cool, it’s hip… but overpriced for what it is. not like downtown sd is anything other than a tourist attraction. and drunk tank.
and downtown sucks.
Participantwhat about buying put options? you know the stock will jump, one way or the other then gradually slide…
Participantwhat about buying put options? you know the stock will jump, one way or the other then gradually slide…
Participantdepending on when you buy, it’s either “home” or “loss”.
Participantdepending on when you buy, it’s either “home” or “loss”.
Participanta thought about “inflation”…
it sucks to be in the bottom 3/4 that has been inflated on. top earners have inflated along with asset and commodity prices. top earners have absorbed all the wage inflation that would have otherwise been spread around. i guess this is what they mean by stagflation; 3/4 stagnating in wages while prices across the board are inflating. imported chinese goods excluded.
prices of goods can inflate because the *wealth* of the bottom 3/4 is being diminished. that is, people still have the wealth to pay for inflated goods without dipping below sustenance levels. that would explain the zero savings rate, anyway… no savings = no wealth = spending to support inflation.
Participanta thought about “inflation”…
it sucks to be in the bottom 3/4 that has been inflated on. top earners have inflated along with asset and commodity prices. top earners have absorbed all the wage inflation that would have otherwise been spread around. i guess this is what they mean by stagflation; 3/4 stagnating in wages while prices across the board are inflating. imported chinese goods excluded.
prices of goods can inflate because the *wealth* of the bottom 3/4 is being diminished. that is, people still have the wealth to pay for inflated goods without dipping below sustenance levels. that would explain the zero savings rate, anyway… no savings = no wealth = spending to support inflation.
Participantof course, your argument assumes that the govt is currently receiving enough money to reasonably deal with the problems.
the deficit says otherwise. per capita expenditures say otherwise.
as for private institutions, i just watched sicko. interesting stuff if true.
Participantof course, your argument assumes that the govt is currently receiving enough money to reasonably deal with the problems.
the deficit says otherwise. per capita expenditures say otherwise.
as for private institutions, i just watched sicko. interesting stuff if true.
Participantdammit, i meant jimmy buffett…
wasting away… in macarenaville
-
AuthorPosts