Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
donaldduckmoore
ParticipantHaving all these backup plans layed out by the Fed, apparently there will be something chaotic coming soon. Wall street thought these are good news but they never know there is crisis.
ParticipantHaving all these backup plans layed out by the Fed, apparently there will be something chaotic coming soon. Wall street thought these are good news but they never know there is crisis.
ParticipantHaving all these backup plans layed out by the Fed, apparently there will be something chaotic coming soon. Wall street thought these are good news but they never know there is crisis.
ParticipantHaving all these backup plans layed out by the Fed, apparently there will be something chaotic coming soon. Wall street thought these are good news but they never know there is crisis.
ParticipantHaving all these backup plans layed out by the Fed, apparently there will be something chaotic coming soon. Wall street thought these are good news but they never know there is crisis.
ParticipantWho is to lose in this deal? The banks or the tax payers? The banks will never do business without profit, so I doubt the banks must have some goodies from the gov. Then, we the tax payers, what do we lose from this.
Although I don’t think this will help a lot of people, “thousands over millions”, but this is against the concept of capitalism and open market economy. We always blame China about too much legislative and administrative control over their economy and currency policy. What happen to us. We are doing the same thing here big time. What open market, it is purely “artificial”. Our new economic direction is “communitalism”.
ParticipantWho is to lose in this deal? The banks or the tax payers? The banks will never do business without profit, so I doubt the banks must have some goodies from the gov. Then, we the tax payers, what do we lose from this.
Although I don’t think this will help a lot of people, “thousands over millions”, but this is against the concept of capitalism and open market economy. We always blame China about too much legislative and administrative control over their economy and currency policy. What happen to us. We are doing the same thing here big time. What open market, it is purely “artificial”. Our new economic direction is “communitalism”.
ParticipantWho is to lose in this deal? The banks or the tax payers? The banks will never do business without profit, so I doubt the banks must have some goodies from the gov. Then, we the tax payers, what do we lose from this.
Although I don’t think this will help a lot of people, “thousands over millions”, but this is against the concept of capitalism and open market economy. We always blame China about too much legislative and administrative control over their economy and currency policy. What happen to us. We are doing the same thing here big time. What open market, it is purely “artificial”. Our new economic direction is “communitalism”.
ParticipantWho is to lose in this deal? The banks or the tax payers? The banks will never do business without profit, so I doubt the banks must have some goodies from the gov. Then, we the tax payers, what do we lose from this.
Although I don’t think this will help a lot of people, “thousands over millions”, but this is against the concept of capitalism and open market economy. We always blame China about too much legislative and administrative control over their economy and currency policy. What happen to us. We are doing the same thing here big time. What open market, it is purely “artificial”. Our new economic direction is “communitalism”.
ParticipantWho is to lose in this deal? The banks or the tax payers? The banks will never do business without profit, so I doubt the banks must have some goodies from the gov. Then, we the tax payers, what do we lose from this.
Although I don’t think this will help a lot of people, “thousands over millions”, but this is against the concept of capitalism and open market economy. We always blame China about too much legislative and administrative control over their economy and currency policy. What happen to us. We are doing the same thing here big time. What open market, it is purely “artificial”. Our new economic direction is “communitalism”.
ParticipantFilling up all the dry weedy areas with cement is certainly impossible to do, but at least we should do that to areas that are close to residential areas. Studies need to be done. In some other countries, slopes that are close to the freeways are cemented. Even in LA, most of the open areas are irrigated well. In additional to the cosmetic issue, irrigated vegetation tend not to get burnt so easily. When you look at similar areas in SD, they are covered with brown and long weeds. They look like semi-drought areas in Africa. It catches fires so easily.
ParticipantFilling up all the dry weedy areas with cement is certainly impossible to do, but at least we should do that to areas that are close to residential areas. Studies need to be done. In some other countries, slopes that are close to the freeways are cemented. Even in LA, most of the open areas are irrigated well. In additional to the cosmetic issue, irrigated vegetation tend not to get burnt so easily. When you look at similar areas in SD, they are covered with brown and long weeds. They look like semi-drought areas in Africa. It catches fires so easily.
ParticipantFilling up all the dry weedy areas with cement is certainly impossible to do, but at least we should do that to areas that are close to residential areas. Studies need to be done. In some other countries, slopes that are close to the freeways are cemented. Even in LA, most of the open areas are irrigated well. In additional to the cosmetic issue, irrigated vegetation tend not to get burnt so easily. When you look at similar areas in SD, they are covered with brown and long weeds. They look like semi-drought areas in Africa. It catches fires so easily.
Participantless likely to buy.
-
AuthorPosts
