[Diego Mamani]

When we needed a new WS we called our local Subie dealership (I know, how naive of us). They referred us to a local auto glass guy who does nothing but windshields. He used an aftermarket part, but did a great job.

[Diego Mamani]

When we needed a new WS we called our local Subie dealership (I know, how naive of us). They referred us to a local auto glass guy who does nothing but windshields. He used an aftermarket part, but did a great job.

[Diego Mamani]

When we needed a new WS we called our local Subie dealership (I know, how naive of us). They referred us to a local auto glass guy who does nothing but windshields. He used an aftermarket part, but did a great job.

[Diego Mamani]

When we needed a new WS we called our local Subie dealership (I know, how naive of us). They referred us to a local auto glass guy who does nothing but windshields. He used an aftermarket part, but did a great job.

[Diego Mamani]

When we needed a new WS we called our local Subie dealership (I know, how naive of us). They referred us to a local auto glass guy who does nothing but windshields. He used an aftermarket part, but did a great job.

[Diego Mamani]

[quote=flu]… I don’t understand why OUR nation (Congress) authorizes “relief” packages to foreign countries…[/quote]

I see, you were talking about Congress-mandated aid. That is off-off topic in this thread. In any case, any foreign aid approved by Congress is usually peanuts. Let me explain. The US protects its farmers with huge trade tariffs imposed against certain imported products, like corn and avocados, etc. The result is that we, U.S. consumers, pay $1.50 for one avocado that would cost $0.25 or less in a free-trade world.

This amounts to you and me being forced to give charity to U.S. farmers. That is bad enough. But what is really atrocious is the fact that the current scheme amounts to stealing from farmers in poor countries. By imposing tariffs, we artificially reduce the income of third countries by billions. In exchange, the US Congress sends a few million dollars as “foreign aid”.

And you still think we are being too generous? I don’t think so. I hope this Thanksgiving our farmers were very grateful for their continued windfall. Unfortunately, they take it for granted and believe they are entitled to all those subsidies, price support schemes, and trade tariffs.

(/libertarian rant OFF)

[Diego Mamani]

[quote=flu]… I don’t understand why OUR nation (Congress) authorizes “relief” packages to foreign countries…[/quote]

I see, you were talking about Congress-mandated aid. That is off-off topic in this thread. In any case, any foreign aid approved by Congress is usually peanuts. Let me explain. The US protects its farmers with huge trade tariffs imposed against certain imported products, like corn and avocados, etc. The result is that we, U.S. consumers, pay $1.50 for one avocado that would cost $0.25 or less in a free-trade world.

This amounts to you and me being forced to give charity to U.S. farmers. That is bad enough. But what is really atrocious is the fact that the current scheme amounts to stealing from farmers in poor countries. By imposing tariffs, we artificially reduce the income of third countries by billions. In exchange, the US Congress sends a few million dollars as “foreign aid”.

And you still think we are being too generous? I don’t think so. I hope this Thanksgiving our farmers were very grateful for their continued windfall. Unfortunately, they take it for granted and believe they are entitled to all those subsidies, price support schemes, and trade tariffs.

(/libertarian rant OFF)

[Diego Mamani]

[quote=flu]… I don’t understand why OUR nation (Congress) authorizes “relief” packages to foreign countries…[/quote]

I see, you were talking about Congress-mandated aid. That is off-off topic in this thread. In any case, any foreign aid approved by Congress is usually peanuts. Let me explain. The US protects its farmers with huge trade tariffs imposed against certain imported products, like corn and avocados, etc. The result is that we, U.S. consumers, pay $1.50 for one avocado that would cost $0.25 or less in a free-trade world.

This amounts to you and me being forced to give charity to U.S. farmers. That is bad enough. But what is really atrocious is the fact that the current scheme amounts to stealing from farmers in poor countries. By imposing tariffs, we artificially reduce the income of third countries by billions. In exchange, the US Congress sends a few million dollars as “foreign aid”.

And you still think we are being too generous? I don’t think so. I hope this Thanksgiving our farmers were very grateful for their continued windfall. Unfortunately, they take it for granted and believe they are entitled to all those subsidies, price support schemes, and trade tariffs.

(/libertarian rant OFF)

[Diego Mamani]

[quote=flu]… I don’t understand why OUR nation (Congress) authorizes “relief” packages to foreign countries…[/quote]

I see, you were talking about Congress-mandated aid. That is off-off topic in this thread. In any case, any foreign aid approved by Congress is usually peanuts. Let me explain. The US protects its farmers with huge trade tariffs imposed against certain imported products, like corn and avocados, etc. The result is that we, U.S. consumers, pay $1.50 for one avocado that would cost $0.25 or less in a free-trade world.

This amounts to you and me being forced to give charity to U.S. farmers. That is bad enough. But what is really atrocious is the fact that the current scheme amounts to stealing from farmers in poor countries. By imposing tariffs, we artificially reduce the income of third countries by billions. In exchange, the US Congress sends a few million dollars as “foreign aid”.

And you still think we are being too generous? I don’t think so. I hope this Thanksgiving our farmers were very grateful for their continued windfall. Unfortunately, they take it for granted and believe they are entitled to all those subsidies, price support schemes, and trade tariffs.

(/libertarian rant OFF)

[Diego Mamani]

[quote=flu]… I don’t understand why OUR nation (Congress) authorizes “relief” packages to foreign countries…[/quote]

I see, you were talking about Congress-mandated aid. That is off-off topic in this thread. In any case, any foreign aid approved by Congress is usually peanuts. Let me explain. The US protects its farmers with huge trade tariffs imposed against certain imported products, like corn and avocados, etc. The result is that we, U.S. consumers, pay $1.50 for one avocado that would cost $0.25 or less in a free-trade world.

This amounts to you and me being forced to give charity to U.S. farmers. That is bad enough. But what is really atrocious is the fact that the current scheme amounts to stealing from farmers in poor countries. By imposing tariffs, we artificially reduce the income of third countries by billions. In exchange, the US Congress sends a few million dollars as “foreign aid”.

And you still think we are being too generous? I don’t think so. I hope this Thanksgiving our farmers were very grateful for their continued windfall. Unfortunately, they take it for granted and believe they are entitled to all those subsidies, price support schemes, and trade tariffs.

(/libertarian rant OFF)

[Diego Mamani]

Flu: Charity has nothing to do with nationalism. This “us” versus “them” approach is misguided IMO. Besides, efforts like Kiva hardly count as charity: you get your money back, after all, sans interest.

[Diego Mamani]

Flu: Charity has nothing to do with nationalism. This “us” versus “them” approach is misguided IMO. Besides, efforts like Kiva hardly count as charity: you get your money back, after all, sans interest.

[Diego Mamani]

Flu: Charity has nothing to do with nationalism. This “us” versus “them” approach is misguided IMO. Besides, efforts like Kiva hardly count as charity: you get your money back, after all, sans interest.

[Diego Mamani]

Flu: Charity has nothing to do with nationalism. This “us” versus “them” approach is misguided IMO. Besides, efforts like Kiva hardly count as charity: you get your money back, after all, sans interest.

[Diego Mamani]

Flu: Charity has nothing to do with nationalism. This “us” versus “them” approach is misguided IMO. Besides, efforts like Kiva hardly count as charity: you get your money back, after all, sans interest.

[Author]

Posts