Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Deal Hunter
ParticipantThe $200 Billion is in the form of T-bills, not central bank reserves or Bernanke’s retirement stash. It’s STILL a taxpayer bail-out. No better than taxation without representation.
ParticipantThe $200 Billion is in the form of T-bills, not central bank reserves or Bernanke’s retirement stash. It’s STILL a taxpayer bail-out. No better than taxation without representation.
ParticipantThe $200 Billion is in the form of T-bills, not central bank reserves or Bernanke’s retirement stash. It’s STILL a taxpayer bail-out. No better than taxation without representation.
ParticipantThe $200 Billion is in the form of T-bills, not central bank reserves or Bernanke’s retirement stash. It’s STILL a taxpayer bail-out. No better than taxation without representation.
ParticipantThe $200 Billion is in the form of T-bills, not central bank reserves or Bernanke’s retirement stash. It’s STILL a taxpayer bail-out. No better than taxation without representation.
ParticipantCRAZYYYYY!
It’s essentially getting people to add a revolving type credit debt to their already over leveraged lives – for what? To keep a house that’s underwater?
When secured loans go bad and a short sale or foreclosure must take place, at least the obligations are wiped out with the disposition of the property. This is the best outcome for borrowers who have a legitimate hardship.
With UNsecured loans, the obligation to pay that debt will follow you around for a very long time. In some states, the statute of limitations on debt collection for unsecured debt is 25 years!
HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE!
ParticipantCRAZYYYYY!
It’s essentially getting people to add a revolving type credit debt to their already over leveraged lives – for what? To keep a house that’s underwater?
When secured loans go bad and a short sale or foreclosure must take place, at least the obligations are wiped out with the disposition of the property. This is the best outcome for borrowers who have a legitimate hardship.
With UNsecured loans, the obligation to pay that debt will follow you around for a very long time. In some states, the statute of limitations on debt collection for unsecured debt is 25 years!
HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE!
ParticipantCRAZYYYYY!
It’s essentially getting people to add a revolving type credit debt to their already over leveraged lives – for what? To keep a house that’s underwater?
When secured loans go bad and a short sale or foreclosure must take place, at least the obligations are wiped out with the disposition of the property. This is the best outcome for borrowers who have a legitimate hardship.
With UNsecured loans, the obligation to pay that debt will follow you around for a very long time. In some states, the statute of limitations on debt collection for unsecured debt is 25 years!
HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE!
ParticipantCRAZYYYYY!
It’s essentially getting people to add a revolving type credit debt to their already over leveraged lives – for what? To keep a house that’s underwater?
When secured loans go bad and a short sale or foreclosure must take place, at least the obligations are wiped out with the disposition of the property. This is the best outcome for borrowers who have a legitimate hardship.
With UNsecured loans, the obligation to pay that debt will follow you around for a very long time. In some states, the statute of limitations on debt collection for unsecured debt is 25 years!
HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE!
ParticipantCRAZYYYYY!
It’s essentially getting people to add a revolving type credit debt to their already over leveraged lives – for what? To keep a house that’s underwater?
When secured loans go bad and a short sale or foreclosure must take place, at least the obligations are wiped out with the disposition of the property. This is the best outcome for borrowers who have a legitimate hardship.
With UNsecured loans, the obligation to pay that debt will follow you around for a very long time. In some states, the statute of limitations on debt collection for unsecured debt is 25 years!
HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE!
March 10, 2008 at 1:15 PM in reply to: What if Fannie and Freddie can’t prop up Housing??? Article linked #166830ParticipantYou mean the “re-nationalization” of Freddie and Fannie?
March 10, 2008 at 1:15 PM in reply to: What if Fannie and Freddie can’t prop up Housing??? Article linked #167151ParticipantYou mean the “re-nationalization” of Freddie and Fannie?
March 10, 2008 at 1:15 PM in reply to: What if Fannie and Freddie can’t prop up Housing??? Article linked #167155ParticipantYou mean the “re-nationalization” of Freddie and Fannie?
March 10, 2008 at 1:15 PM in reply to: What if Fannie and Freddie can’t prop up Housing??? Article linked #167187ParticipantYou mean the “re-nationalization” of Freddie and Fannie?
-
AuthorPosts
