[davelj]

[quote=CONCHO][quote=davelj]
[That is, I’m assuming that the genetic modification increases yields in some way, shape or form… which means more food… which means less starvation and/or more inexpensive food. Where you stand depends upon where you sit. Again, I have little doubt that folks starving in Africa are up in arms about “Frankenfood” – anything with “food” in it will be an improvement.][/quote]

In India, a country no stranger to hunger, farmers have been committing suicide en masse because their farms and livelihoods have been destroyed after switching to GMO crops. Tens of thousands of Indian farmers have killed themselves so far after falling into debts brought on by poor-yielding GMO seeds that must be repurchased each planting season. Prince Charles has been working to bring this horrific situation into the public eye for years, but to little effect in the USA, apparently.

As a side note, Prince Charles has long championed sustainable and organic agriculture practices and even tends his own organic garden.[/quote]

I’m no expert on this by a long shot… but are you suggesting that going all-organic would increase crop yields around the globe? In other words, if we abandoned GMO, fertilizers, etc. – all of the “bad” stuff – would the resulting yields not decline on an aggregate basis?

[davelj]

[quote=CONCHO][quote=davelj]
[That is, I’m assuming that the genetic modification increases yields in some way, shape or form… which means more food… which means less starvation and/or more inexpensive food. Where you stand depends upon where you sit. Again, I have little doubt that folks starving in Africa are up in arms about “Frankenfood” – anything with “food” in it will be an improvement.][/quote]

In India, a country no stranger to hunger, farmers have been committing suicide en masse because their farms and livelihoods have been destroyed after switching to GMO crops. Tens of thousands of Indian farmers have killed themselves so far after falling into debts brought on by poor-yielding GMO seeds that must be repurchased each planting season. Prince Charles has been working to bring this horrific situation into the public eye for years, but to little effect in the USA, apparently.

As a side note, Prince Charles has long championed sustainable and organic agriculture practices and even tends his own organic garden.[/quote]

I’m no expert on this by a long shot… but are you suggesting that going all-organic would increase crop yields around the globe? In other words, if we abandoned GMO, fertilizers, etc. – all of the “bad” stuff – would the resulting yields not decline on an aggregate basis?

[davelj]

[quote=CONCHO][quote=davelj]
[That is, I’m assuming that the genetic modification increases yields in some way, shape or form… which means more food… which means less starvation and/or more inexpensive food. Where you stand depends upon where you sit. Again, I have little doubt that folks starving in Africa are up in arms about “Frankenfood” – anything with “food” in it will be an improvement.][/quote]

In India, a country no stranger to hunger, farmers have been committing suicide en masse because their farms and livelihoods have been destroyed after switching to GMO crops. Tens of thousands of Indian farmers have killed themselves so far after falling into debts brought on by poor-yielding GMO seeds that must be repurchased each planting season. Prince Charles has been working to bring this horrific situation into the public eye for years, but to little effect in the USA, apparently.

As a side note, Prince Charles has long championed sustainable and organic agriculture practices and even tends his own organic garden.[/quote]

I’m no expert on this by a long shot… but are you suggesting that going all-organic would increase crop yields around the globe? In other words, if we abandoned GMO, fertilizers, etc. – all of the “bad” stuff – would the resulting yields not decline on an aggregate basis?

[davelj]

[quote=CONCHO][quote=davelj]
[That is, I’m assuming that the genetic modification increases yields in some way, shape or form… which means more food… which means less starvation and/or more inexpensive food. Where you stand depends upon where you sit. Again, I have little doubt that folks starving in Africa are up in arms about “Frankenfood” – anything with “food” in it will be an improvement.][/quote]

In India, a country no stranger to hunger, farmers have been committing suicide en masse because their farms and livelihoods have been destroyed after switching to GMO crops. Tens of thousands of Indian farmers have killed themselves so far after falling into debts brought on by poor-yielding GMO seeds that must be repurchased each planting season. Prince Charles has been working to bring this horrific situation into the public eye for years, but to little effect in the USA, apparently.

As a side note, Prince Charles has long championed sustainable and organic agriculture practices and even tends his own organic garden.[/quote]

I’m no expert on this by a long shot… but are you suggesting that going all-organic would increase crop yields around the globe? In other words, if we abandoned GMO, fertilizers, etc. – all of the “bad” stuff – would the resulting yields not decline on an aggregate basis?

[davelj]

[quote=briansd1]

I’m dismayed at what people stuff themselves with everyday. [/quote]

I agree. Why do people stuff themselves with McDonalds hamburgers when an In-n-Out is probably just a few miles up the road? This constantly irks me.

[davelj]

[quote=briansd1]

I’m dismayed at what people stuff themselves with everyday. [/quote]

I agree. Why do people stuff themselves with McDonalds hamburgers when an In-n-Out is probably just a few miles up the road? This constantly irks me.

[davelj]

[quote=briansd1]

I’m dismayed at what people stuff themselves with everyday. [/quote]

I agree. Why do people stuff themselves with McDonalds hamburgers when an In-n-Out is probably just a few miles up the road? This constantly irks me.

[davelj]

[quote=briansd1]

I’m dismayed at what people stuff themselves with everyday. [/quote]

I agree. Why do people stuff themselves with McDonalds hamburgers when an In-n-Out is probably just a few miles up the road? This constantly irks me.

[davelj]

[quote=briansd1]

I’m dismayed at what people stuff themselves with everyday. [/quote]

I agree. Why do people stuff themselves with McDonalds hamburgers when an In-n-Out is probably just a few miles up the road? This constantly irks me.

[davelj]

[quote=ILoveRegulation]

And I’m still waiting for anyone to name a single benefit of GMO foods.[/quote]

Wait… wait… I think I know this one… is it the “food” part?

[That is, I’m assuming that the genetic modification increases yields in some way, shape or form… which means more food… which means less starvation and/or more inexpensive food. Where you stand depends upon where you sit. Again, I have little doubt that folks starving in Africa are up in arms about “Frankenfood” – anything with “food” in it will be an improvement.]

[davelj]

[quote=ILoveRegulation]

And I’m still waiting for anyone to name a single benefit of GMO foods.[/quote]

Wait… wait… I think I know this one… is it the “food” part?

[That is, I’m assuming that the genetic modification increases yields in some way, shape or form… which means more food… which means less starvation and/or more inexpensive food. Where you stand depends upon where you sit. Again, I have little doubt that folks starving in Africa are up in arms about “Frankenfood” – anything with “food” in it will be an improvement.]

[davelj]

[quote=ILoveRegulation]

And I’m still waiting for anyone to name a single benefit of GMO foods.[/quote]

Wait… wait… I think I know this one… is it the “food” part?

[That is, I’m assuming that the genetic modification increases yields in some way, shape or form… which means more food… which means less starvation and/or more inexpensive food. Where you stand depends upon where you sit. Again, I have little doubt that folks starving in Africa are up in arms about “Frankenfood” – anything with “food” in it will be an improvement.]

[davelj]

[quote=ILoveRegulation]

And I’m still waiting for anyone to name a single benefit of GMO foods.[/quote]

Wait… wait… I think I know this one… is it the “food” part?

[That is, I’m assuming that the genetic modification increases yields in some way, shape or form… which means more food… which means less starvation and/or more inexpensive food. Where you stand depends upon where you sit. Again, I have little doubt that folks starving in Africa are up in arms about “Frankenfood” – anything with “food” in it will be an improvement.]

[davelj]

[quote=ILoveRegulation]

And I’m still waiting for anyone to name a single benefit of GMO foods.[/quote]

Wait… wait… I think I know this one… is it the “food” part?

[That is, I’m assuming that the genetic modification increases yields in some way, shape or form… which means more food… which means less starvation and/or more inexpensive food. Where you stand depends upon where you sit. Again, I have little doubt that folks starving in Africa are up in arms about “Frankenfood” – anything with “food” in it will be an improvement.]

[davelj]

[quote=CONCHO] It is hard to avoid the poisons.[/quote]

As in the case of bacteria, how is your body going to build up a resistance if you don’t introduce it into your system? Only in a country of such abundance would people be up in arms over genetically-engineered food. I’m certain the folks in Africa are apoplectic. Genetically-engineered food? Bring it on. Now, where are my robots!?!?

[Author]

Posts